View Full Version : jsr own scopes 3-9-50 pa ir mil dot
garrygun
14-10-2005, 10:39 PM
Hi! i would like to know views on these scopes compared to similar optics &value for money, thanks garry.
boltaction
14-10-2005, 11:26 PM
I have two, whilst not on par with my Bussnel 6x18 optically, they are excellent value for money, and you would have spend a lot more money to better them IMHO.
jim
pw,magman
15-10-2005, 06:56 AM
alot of scope for 60 quid
just got one & seems excellent value
ordered & delivered in 3 days :eek:
very pleased :)
Velocette
15-10-2005, 09:25 AM
Nice clear image and the mil dots are fine for airgun use. First dot under at X6 mag at 40yds works for me. The eye relief at higher mags is less than a Swat,,,but at £60, it suits me sir.
scottywong
15-10-2005, 09:36 AM
i have both the 3/9/50 and the 6/24/50 and the glass is fine for the money a real bargain.the only problem with them seems to be the pa ring is very stiff on some although my 3/9 is fine but the 6/24 is stiff but i rarely use the pa anyway so not a problem.
ps i would recomend the 3/9/50 as being more usefull for hunting than the other.
scotty :)
Velocette
15-10-2005, 09:43 AM
I too had a problem with PA stiffness on the 3/9/50. Have you had a look inside the PA end with a torch?? There is a huge lump of spring in there which seems to keep the front end tensioned. If the tension could be reduced a little then I,m sure the PA would be much smoother. Like you though,,I tend to set it and leave it alone.
scottywong
15-10-2005, 09:49 AM
i will have a look, i always presumed its was a badly cut thread but worth alook.
scotty :)
Chris St. MH
15-10-2005, 09:53 AM
i have both the 3/9/50 and the 6/24/50 and the glass is fine for the money a real bargain.the only problem with them seems to be the pa ring is very stiff on some although my 3/9 is fine but the 6/24 is stiff but i rarely use the pa anyway so not a problem.
ps i would recomend the 3/9/50 as being more usefull for hunting than the other.
scotty :)
I also have both these scopes and agree wholeheartedly with all of the above. I personally prefer the 3-9x50. My only complaint is that the reticle on the 6-24 isn't etched and looks a bit naff (like two pieces of sparkling string when you use the IR). That said, I've never used the IR feature in the field.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.