PDA

View Full Version : Remington 597 in .22lr


phil384
07-12-2003, 03:27 PM
I was torn between the 597, a CZ and the 10/22. Why did I go for the Remy? For a start it's cheaper than the others (£185) but these are all low end, budget rifles and the difference in cost is not likely to change your lifestyle.

The main reasons were the looks and the stock. I have used it many, many times and it still looks brand new despite lugging it over stiles, fences and walking through brambles etc. The synthetic stock is hard wearing, zero maintenance and gives a good grip as it's slightly grainy.

The rifle is also quite short with a sturdy barrel and therefore ideal, in my opinion for rough shooting. Mine has a steel Parker-Hale silencer (the standard gun is screw cut for a moderator which also keeps costs down)and a bipod. It's also fitted with a rubber coated cheapo 3-9x40 scope. The result is a rugged, no nonsense, working gun. I don't get too emotional about my guns! All I really care about is whether or not they do the job. This one does.

I now use nothing but Eley hollowpoint extra subs. I cannot begin to tell you how good these rounds are in this rifle. If I miss then it's down to me, my fault, end of.

The trigger is OK. Can't say much more about it really, not bad, not good but OK.

The safety is convenient and easy to use, a button just behind the trigger on the rear of the trigger guard, nice and positive.

The magazines are a complete and utter F** pain in the ****! Mine came with a metal one and, unless cleaned and oiled every 40-50 rounds or so jammed virtually every time. I then bought a couple of plastic ones. No better. Now I have stripped them down, lightly rubbed down the plastic followers where they come into contact with the case and slighlty stretched the spring and they are now bearable, especially if loaded with no more than 6 rounds. If Remington sort these out I don't think you could really fault the rifle, they really do spoil my enjoyment of it. Shame.

All in all, if you want a working rifle that will outshoot most of us, that will take the occasional knock in it's stride and won't break the bank then it wouldn't be a bad thing to be a little bit different and consider the 597. It can't be too bad, the RFD i bought it off recommended it over the other .22lr in stock and I'm happy.

JonathanH
09-12-2003, 02:25 PM
Does anyone else have one of these rifles, i am interested in getting one myself and would like an opinion.

thanks

J

Chris (South Ronaldsay)
09-12-2003, 08:01 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JonathanH:
Does anyone else have one of these rifles, i am interested in getting one myself and would like an opinion.

thanks

J[/quote]

Dave Blair has one with the carbon steel barrel and synthetic stock. He was quite happy with it the last time I spoke to him.

Jon Budd
09-12-2003, 08:42 PM
I had a little play with Phil's...

From the brief outing I had using it, I'd say the review was bang on ! Mags jams were kinda annoying, and that scope really was cheap <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="Big Grin" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin::D-->

Overall, it did have quite a nice, solid, no nonsense feel to it, and I certainly have no reason to doubt it's acuracy.

HTH - JB

jack
12-12-2003, 08:10 AM
Yep - I had one..

Great little gun - BUT the mags done my head in - I had 4 metal mags - as phil384 said, they jam and wont feed the next round up after 40-50 round from clean.

With the Eley subs is shot great - amazing little groups from a cheap gun.

I had one of those volcolsten (spelling!!) hammers fitted and this made the trigger sweet (A MUST if you have a 597)

I spent ages - months and months trying to get these mags working good (tried the polishing of the followers - spring tension / dry lubes / std lubes/ no lubes / Lee resizing lube (which worked the best!) / you name it I tried it - until I got fed up and PX for a custom 10/22. BUT I did love shooting the 597.

Jack

NESoDak
12-12-2003, 08:06 PM
I have had both a blued/synthetic model and a stainless laminate model. Both shot well and the later production stainless model had a better out of the box trigger. I am going to pile on along with the others here and complain about the magazines. Loaded with no more than 8 rounds they would feed about 70% of the time if kept well clean. The Volquartsen hammer is indeed a must have for serious shooting. If only they would make a decent magazine for the Remmie I would still have them both. They aggrevated me enough that I sold them both and decided to go with a T/C Benchmark heavy barrel. Steel reciever, steel magazines and a very nice factory trigger.

stevek
20-12-2003, 09:44 PM
I bought a heavy barreled version with a laminated stock , ditto the mag problems , mine also had a problem with extraction and the s*ds had jammed the guide rods in the reciever (too much threadlock which had run all over the place) so it was a real pain to strip the first time , got too fed up with it so now edgar brothers have it back and my money has gone on a cz452 style , i have to say Joe(of the Gunshop Cats Hill) did not argue or query when i returned the rifle - he just gave me a refund , credit to him for that but a might sus' all the same ! Steve

jonno 357
23-12-2003, 10:56 AM
You all seem to have experienced the same problems with the remm 597.I have a ruger 10/22 and is superb. I thought about getting a remmi because of the price, but before I bought the ruger I went to SYSS. I spoke to Roger at SYSS and he advised me not get a remmi and stick with the rugers. He's had so many problems with them in the past.

Jonno

wfcody
23-04-2004, 09:10 PM
In answer to all your queries about the MAGS. on the 597 I purchased one last year to fit my aroura 3 NV to.

The first mags I had kept jamming and miss-feeding.

I got intouch with Edgar Bros and they replaced them with new ones that had been modified and just arrived from the States.

These I found would only work properly if you only put in 8 rounds and even then would play up at times.

I contacted Egar Bros again and they replaced these with the new Mk.3 and since then I have had no problems.

I also own a Ruger 10/22 and have never been let down by this rifle.

A word of warning to any one buying NV.....once you remove your scope and then re-fit it it only takes about 15 to 20 rounds to re-zero.

To re-zero a NV you can expect to use between 50 to 80 rounds if you are lucky.

Now you know why I have two .22s

AL.
13-05-2004, 12:57 PM
Dave Blair has one with the carbon steel barrel and synthetic stock. He was quite happy with it the last time I spoke to him. [/B][/QUOTE]

Do you hear much from him Chris ?
Ain,t heard from him in yonks.

Al.:cool: