PDA

View Full Version : Daystate rangemasters--- My review


Ferrets Bueller
24-09-2008, 09:34 PM
I purchased 2 boxes of these at the Midland Game Fair on Saturday, the supposed price of £17.99 had been reduced to £12.50 for the show, and i have heard that this will be the price now. Whether this is true or not i cant comment but hopefully Daystate have seen the light or more likely saw the negative response to the proposed pricing on the BBS and followed suit accordingly.

With the Daystate selects being no longer made (the older daystate pellets) and these being the pellets i used in all my rifles, i was rather worried as supplies of these will dry up soon, leaving me with the need to find a suitable replacement. Upon hearing of the release of these new rangemaster pellets i hoped they would be a good replacement to the old pellets even the price wasnt of too much concern, even though i thought i was a rip off at £17.99 i would have paid that to have a good consistent pellet and more so when i heard that Pax (the defiant manufacturers) as if they were to be of the quality and constituency of the previous defiant pellets i thought we are on to a winner, that was until i heard that they would be bullet shaped liked the defiants, from that moment i knew what the result would be and that they would perform just like defiants and penetrators had, excellent indoors or with no wind but outdoors and the slightest breeze i knew what the result would be before i even tested them. But to be fair i purchased them to give them a fair crack.

The pellets
You get 650 pellets (in a plastic bag) in a box the same as the Logun Penetrators come in, although nicely packaged some foam would have been nice in the box to help damage to the pellets. Upon inspection the pellets look very good quality and i believe a good consistent weight ,they are stated as 8.5 grain on the box and ive heard that the variation is about 8.4-8.6 which is rather good, upon closer inspection of the pellet you can see a consist ant mark in the pellets head, what looks like a small nick from the lead, as this is on nearly every pellet i assume this is a machine mark?. Also underneath the head where it joins the shirt there is some rough machining marks visible, whether both this flaws will contribute to inaccuracy im not sure as they are only small flaws they are flaws.

The packaging

Shown here (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x159/123bretland/Rangemastertest008.jpg)

Side by side, New Daystate Rangemaster on the left, and a old Daystate select to the right.

shown here (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x159/123bretland/Rangemastertest005.jpg)

The test rig

My 2 week old Daystate Mk4 was used for the testing, and although new its had about 6000 pellets through it in the 2 weeks ive owned it. Following pellets testing i found the best pellet for it was the Daystate Selects in Any head size (4.51, 4.52 and 4.53) it was producing one hole sub 10mm groups at 45 yards with ease, with no noticeable flyer's at all.

The Mk4 and bean bag rests

Shown here (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x159/123bretland/Rangemastertest001.jpg)

The night before the test i thoroughly cleaned the barrel with a Vfg cleaning rod using the abrasive cleaner felts and paste, 3 of the abrasives were put through and showed how ell the rob and paste worked as they came out black, but less and less with each felt. after the abrasives normal felts (3 off) were put through and the barrel was spotlessly cleaned.

Down to the range (North wales shooting school) and the rifle was set up. The rifle was supported on my bean bag rifle rest and bean bag cushion on the butt, the wind was only slight to mild at about 8mph blowing left to right and on occasion a slight head and tail wind. I attached a wind indicator on top of the target board to keep an eye on wind direction ( a stick with a length of wool) The rifle was filled to 200 bar for each test (it has a max working pressure of 230 bar) and refilled bofore changing pellet or distance.

28 yard testing

Daystate Rangemasters 4.50

I checked zero with the 4.50 rangemasters and it hadnt moved poi at all from my Select zero (28 yards). I then proceeded to plink with them until i had shot over 100 of the 4.50 then i started the grouping test.

9, 3 shot groups were fired at each sheet at this range with a control group of daystate selects thrown in for good measure (after testing of the rangemasters)this are shown above the red dots.


At 28 yards the grouping wasnt good at all, i only got about 4 good groups from the 9 shot, the 4.50 are shown on the 1st and 2nd column on the page of targets and you can see the groups they are capable when the wind drops, they are pellet through pellet, but the groups soon open up with the slightest of breezes. the daystate select group is in the first column bottom row above the red dot and this was when the wind was blowing and is a single pellet hole.

Conclusion=Not good at all, highly affected by the wind

Barrel was again cleaned before using the other pellet head size. 100 of the 4.53 rangemasters were used to plink with and then testing commenced again.

Daystate Rangemasters 4.53

Same range of 28 yards and the grouping is better (3rd and 4th column), definitely tighter groups than the 4.50 but still effected by even the slightest breeze, again another group of the Selects (3rd column bottom row, above the red dot) and they are pellet on pellet.

Conclusion= Better than the 4.50 but still not fantastic.

The 25 yard target itself.

Shown here (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x159/123bretland/rangemastertest2.jpg)

The barrel was cleaned again and another 100 of each head size was fired before testing (before changing head sizes.

45 Yards testing

4.50

After 100 plinking shots i settled down to test the 4.50 rangemasters, same amount of wind as before, the first thing i noticed while plining that the usual 45 yard aimpoint of 1 milldot with selects had changed to 3/4 milldot at 45 yards.

Eight 3 shot groups (1st and 2nd column) this time were fired again rested as before. Again as before when the wind was still the grouping was better than the shotgun groups when the wind was slight, these were totally useless and a real disappointment. You could really see the effects of even the slightest side wind and even more shocking any tail or head wind that would drop or raise the poi.

Conclusion = Useless and a real disappointment


4.53

3rd and 4th column shows the results of this head size and the results are as above greatly effected by wind

Conclusion = Useless and a real disappointment

Now the interesting bit without even firing any pellets when changing pellet type i fired two 3 shot groups of the selects, shown in the middle column bottom row (above the red dot)3 shots in less than a 12mm group, now the wind has carried these shots right by about 12 mm but notice how they still give a group so in effect when allowing for the wind they will still group. i proved this with the group above that one (middle column 3rd row above the green dot) i shot 3 shots allowing for the wind and they all grouped perfect right in the bull, i then fired a 4th shot (shown above the blue dot)not allowing for the wind and it was carried to the exact place as before. So just shows that eeven though effected by the wind (as should be expected) the pellets still give consistent grouping. Using the preferred diet of Daystate selects shows the accuracy of the rifle well.

The 45 yard grouping

Shown here (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x159/123bretland/rangemastertest1.jpg)

In conclusion although i already had predicted the outcome, and knew that due to the bullet shape of the pellet that they would be affected by wind, i did give these a thorough and fair test, Mikeygasbag was with me all along this testing which took more over 3 hours to perform, its still a shame that they wouldnt perform as good as the previous daystate pellets.

Of course all pellets will perform differently in each rifle when the wind dropped they did group well, but again as with the defiants they were highly affedcted by the slightest amount of wind.

Will i be using these pellest to Hunt or in compettion........................................ ........Will i hell.................as with he defiants i bought and tested i expect they will shoot well thorgh my pistols as thats ill use them for :roll:


One more thing...........................Pax pellets, for gods sake make a diabolo pellet, then we will see what your pellets can actually do.

dwazzer
24-09-2008, 11:56 PM
Thanks Mate, a GREAT review and very thorough, I will be considering this when I test the Box I got from the MGF on Sunday and let you know how I get on.....

Cheers Mate....:D

Best regards, Dave...;)

Ferrets Bueller
25-09-2008, 06:21 AM
Thanks Mate, a GREAT review and very thorough, I will be considering this when I test the Box I got from the MGF on Sunday and let you know how I get on.....

Cheers Mate....:D

Best regards, Dave...;)

I would really be interested to hear your findings dave, just remember to have a nice clean barrel before testing;)

Mr. Gain
25-09-2008, 08:07 AM
123Bretland,

thanks for a very interesting report. I wonder how long Daystate will stick with these pellets. TBH I was a bit surprised when they first got involved with Pax Guns, as -rightly or wrongly- I've never rated their products.

On a pedantic note, as I see you are someone who appreciates precision, could I draw your attention to the difference between 'affect' and 'effect'?

To affect something is to change or influence it
To effect something is a rather formal way of saying `to make it happen'.

Confusingly, either may produce an 'effect' or result. ('An affect' is a technical term in psychology.) The stability of the wall was affected by passing lorries.
The demolition of the wall was effected by the detonation of a charge of dynamite. The dynamite did not just 'affect' (influence) the demolition of the wall: it caused it.[Source (http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutspelling/affect) - well worth a visit if you ever feel the need for a guide in the minefield that is the English language!]

So:
The wind affects Rangemaster pellets to a disappointing degree.
The wind has a disappointingly large effect on Rangemaster pellets.

Thanks again.

Ferrets Bueller
25-09-2008, 01:46 PM
Thanks for the info, i found it really helpful:rolleyes:. Im just glad my use of the wrong word had no effect (or should that be affect, hey who cares:mad:) on my testing on the pellets. Thanks for your valuable input, ill be sure to send you a proof to read before my next review.

Thanks


Now my next test....does sarcasm come across on the internet or do i need to be less subtle:D

hughgoldsmith
25-09-2008, 01:49 PM
*sigh* grammar police! Great review though Paul.

Hugh

Ferrets Bueller
25-09-2008, 01:50 PM
*sigh* grammar police! Great review though Paul.

Hugh

Shouldnt you be using "Sigh" instead of *sigh* hugh;)

hughgoldsmith
25-09-2008, 01:50 PM
Oh my God, I didn't start the first sentence of my last post with a capital letter :eek:!

Andy478
25-09-2008, 01:51 PM
Shouldnt you be using "Sigh" instead of *sigh* hugh;)

Shouldn't that be Hugh;):D

hughgoldsmith
25-09-2008, 01:52 PM
Can administrator please delete this thread there is far too many grammatical errors!

Hugh

Ferrets Bueller
25-09-2008, 01:54 PM
Can administrator please delete this thread there is far too many grammatical errors!

Hugh

Gramwhatical?

Steve L
25-09-2008, 03:29 PM
A very good & thorough review Paul, damn sure i won't be parting with £16 to test them unless JSB stop making pellets & then i'll prob use RWS , they'll prob group just as well as the daystates !!

ATB
Steve

mr dink
25-09-2008, 04:22 PM
Nice review Paul you have saved me some time and money sorry its so short a post but i,m watch ing my grama .

dwazzer
25-09-2008, 06:01 PM
Hi Chaps, I thought I would hopefully complement Pauls very good review with a 'mini' one of my own......:confused:

In the general world of shooting an air rifle people tend to go into a gunshop, ask the question 'which are the best pellets?' and then go off with a tin of either cheap crap, middle of the road decent pellets, or the super expensive ones depending on:

A. The advice given by the gun shop (Good and Bad)
B. The amount of profit the gunsmith is making on a particular brand (some shops:rolleyes:)
c. The shooters budget
D. The shooters knowledge on the sport
E. What they have used before that were good.....etc....etc.....

What the majority wont do, or might not have the facility to do, is weigh them, wash them, sort them, lube them etc.
Also, people will tend to just plonk them in their gun and start shooting with them, not necessarily having cleaned their barrell and given the barrell time to lead up with the chosen new pellet......

I therefore decided to do a little comparison with all of the pellets that I own.
I shot 5 of the chosen pellets, then did a group test from a gun vise/shooting rest thing to take out human error (trust me, I am one BIG error...!:p) The group test consisted of 10 shots all aimed at the same point at 35yds outside with little/no wind to speak of. The gun used is a Daystate MK4.
These were the results:
AA diablo 452- http://s397.photobucket.com/albums/pp53/dwazzer/?action=view&current=IMG_1745.jpg These suffered from more than an acceptable number of flyers for my liking

JSB Exacts 452- http://s397.photobucket.com/albums/pp53/dwazzer/?action=view&current=IMG_1746.jpg These were better but wandered around the Zero a little bit, acceptable though.

Daystate FT 451- http://s397.photobucket.com/albums/pp53/dwazzer/?action=view&current=IMG_1747.jpg These were my favourite, bang on every time with only one pellet straying from the same hole but not by much.

New Rangemaster 453- http://s397.photobucket.com/albums/pp53/dwazzer/?action=view&current=IMG_1748-1.jpg These pellets produced the widest and most erratic group, they looked awful until the last few removed the centre of the hole.

So they were my findings, I am sure that if I weighed and sorted all of the diablo shaped pellets I could tighten those groups up a bit but this mini test was about the general shooter and not the perfectionist (the perfectionist wins the comps, but the rest of us make them fun to go to...! and we do win sometimes too;))

Those groups will obviously open out as the ranges get longer.

I will carry on trying the rangemasters (not in comps just yet), but early findings by me, and a lot of what I am hearing about them is......they dont seem to be living up to the hype or hopes.....:(

Cheers, Dave.

mark1
25-09-2008, 07:08 PM
:oI think the rangemaster pellet was designed specifically for mega:eek: high powered FAC guns only.in 22 cal i think they are 29 grains

Ferrets Bueller
25-09-2008, 07:23 PM
:oI think the rangemaster pellet was designed specifically for mega:eek: high powered FAC guns only.in 22 cal i think they are 29 grains

erm ok????????????:confused:

Mog
25-09-2008, 08:04 PM
:oI think the rangemaster pellet was designed specifically for mega:eek: high powered FAC guns only.in 22 cal i think they are 29 grains

5.5mm (.22 inch) Rangemaster FAC bullets 29gr.

Daystate Rangemaster High Energy .177 cal 8.5grains

Different pellets ;)

mark1
25-09-2008, 09:40 PM
have never seen the 177 ones :confused::)only ever used the 29 grain pellets in my 50 ftlb Air Ranger:D

Stuart_B
26-09-2008, 11:47 AM
Daystate Rangemaster High Energy .22 cal 15grains

Dave Ramshead
29-09-2008, 02:58 PM
Paul, as you know I tried some rangemasters at Tawd with you before you did your thorough test (without cleaning barrel) and found my results to be pretty much the same as yours -
4.53 useless in the MK4, with 4.50 better but nowhere as good as weighed AA Field.

After the shoot at Quarry yesterday, I gave the barrel a thorough clean with napier cleaner on rifle clean patches.

4.53 were still useless, but I found the 4.50 changed from being not as good as AA to being the same in group size (sub 5p @45yds) but with the same 25yd zero, 45yds with the rangemasters was now on the 41yd AA aimpoint. All the other aimpoints had squashed up a bit also.

Best groups from the 4.50 were after I'd shot just over 100 and looked to be improving, but ran out of time to do more. Chronoing this morning, the 4.50 were coming out approx 15fps faster than the AA, AA were low 780's, rangemasters were virtually bang on 800fps, so needed turning down a little to be on the safe side.

I turned the MK4 down and did a couple of 32 shot strings:
Lowest 778
Highest 787
ave 782.8

Weighing a small sample batch showed 0.15grain max spread, compared to current batch of AA which have 0.70grain spread from the tin.

Are they worth it? Depends on how you value your time!

You can get the same group sizes out of AA, but not straight out of the tin. You have to weigh and grade them into 1/10th grain weight batches. A tin takes me just over 1 hour to do.
I shoot the 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5 for comp, but find 8.2's and lighter give fliers and 8.6 and over have noticably more drop so only use these in the garden.
Out of a tin of 500, approx 400 are good enough for comps.

Ran out of 4.50's this morning, need some more to do some windage comparisons.

I think you should give the 4,50 another test - but clean the barrel with the napier kit instead of vfg. Do it sunday if you want.

Ferrets Bueller
29-09-2008, 04:36 PM
Hmm that is interesting dave, i guess ill have to retry them again after a napier pull through, ill give this a go on sunday after the comp and we will see what the results are like;)

flims
25-10-2008, 05:13 PM
mate does your Menace have a Metric turret like mine or did you get the MOA version?

Ferrets Bueller
25-10-2008, 05:18 PM
mate does your Menace have a Metric turret like mine or did you get the MOA version?

MOA mate:confused:

MAD MARK
25-10-2008, 05:49 PM
Paul, as you know I tried some rangemasters at Tawd with you before you did your thorough test (without cleaning barrel) and found my results to be pretty much the same as yours -
4.53 useless in the MK4, with 4.50 better but nowhere as good as weighed AA Field.

After the shoot at Quarry yesterday, I gave the barrel a thorough clean with napier cleaner on rifle clean patches.

4.53 were still useless, but I found the 4.50 changed from being not as good as AA to being the same in group size (sub 5p @45yds) but with the same 25yd zero, 45yds with the rangemasters was now on the 41yd AA aimpoint. All the other aimpoints had squashed up a bit also.

Best groups from the 4.50 were after I'd shot just over 100 and looked to be improving, but ran out of time to do more. Chronoing this morning, the 4.50 were coming out approx 15fps faster than the AA, AA were low 780's, rangemasters were virtually bang on 800fps, so needed turning down a little to be on the safe side.

I turned the MK4 down and did a couple of 32 shot strings:
Lowest 778
Highest 787
ave 782.8

Weighing a small sample batch showed 0.15grain max spread, compared to current batch of AA which have 0.70grain spread from the tin.

Are they worth it? Depends on how you value your time!

You can get the same group sizes out of AA, but not straight out of the tin. You have to weigh and grade them into 1/10th grain weight batches. A tin takes me just over 1 hour to do.
I shoot the 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5 for comp, but find 8.2's and lighter give fliers and 8.6 and over have noticably more drop so only use these in the garden.
Out of a tin of 500, approx 400 are good enough for comps.

Ran out of 4.50's this morning, need some more to do some windage comparisons.

I think you should give the 4,50 another test - but clean the barrel with the napier kit instead of vfg. Do it sunday if you want.

Thanks Pete and you Dave,,,I was thinking of trying them myself but wont bother now. I'm a little disappointed daystate put there name on these pellets if they don't work well in there own gun's:confused:

Thanks anyway guy's:):)

flims
25-10-2008, 10:59 PM
how come you didnt go with the MILS turret mate? you would have had everything matching, its soooo much easier!
nice setup. try stretch its capabilities and come back with some photos

Parabuteo
26-10-2008, 05:36 PM
Ditto thanks for that.

Thankfully, I have several tins of select, and loads of Laserdomes (which used to be one of my rifles fave fodder before I discovered selects).

I never found defiants to be that brilliant, and have some of the new daystates to try.....but might give it a miss TBH.

Why change the bloody things if the selects were allready doing so well???

Still, I suppose there are other JSB variants that will do the job, AA venom etc:confused:

Dave Ramshead
28-10-2008, 09:33 AM
Ditto thanks for that.

Thankfully, I have several tins of select, and loads of Laserdomes (which used to be one of my rifles fave fodder before I discovered selects).

I never found defiants to be that brilliant, and have some of the new daystates to try.....but might give it a miss TBH.

Why change the bloody things if the selects were allready doing so well???

Still, I suppose there are other JSB variants that will do the job, AA venom etc:confused:

The jsb derivatives have really suffered with qc problems of late.
When AA first brought the diablo field in (approx 2001), they varied 0.15gr within the tin, now it's 7/10ths of a grain. As I said in my post, if you put some time into them they are still good - but if you want to shoot them straight from the tin they are poor compared to what they used to be.

The rangemasters take the weight qc to hwat it should be and you can use all the pellets in the box, whereas you only get circa 200ish at the advertised weight with jsb derivatives.

If the rangemasters really suited my barrel better than the alternatives, I would use them. As it stands, there are other pellets that suit my barrel better than jsb derivatives & rangemasters.