PDA

View Full Version : Swift 6-18x44 mildot


triggerman
05-09-2005, 09:36 PM
Review of Swift Premier 6-18x44 Mil Dot (688m)

I had been looking for a scope in the 4-16 or 6-24 range for some time for an extremely accurate FAC Super 10. I wanted good optics (don’t we all!), good repeatability, a mil dot reticule and value for money.

I had heard of Swift on the Internet and decided to check it out. Claims of ‘as good as Leupold or awfully close’ had me interested. I discovered that the company had its origins in 1926 making medical and veterinary optics for industry so this boded well. I also learned that their current range of scopes was recently upgraded to ‘Premier’ status in 2004 with different multi-coated optics. Feedback from guys on rimfirecentral.com confirmed that the optics were excellent and that the scopes were very good value for money. So I decided to take the plunge and got myself a 6-18x44-mil dot from Derek Talbot at Ballymount Field Sports in Dublin.

The model is the 687M. It is 15.4” long and weighs 22.6oz and has a satin finish. It parallaxes from ten yards to infinity and has a quick focus eyepiece. The turret adjustments are ¼ “and the clicks are very positive and audible. The target turrets covered by dust caps and these, along with the AO and the magnification ring have heavily serrated edges that make for good grip. In addition, the magnification has a raised nib that also helps with the adjustment. All distances and magnifications are highlighted in gold and are clearly visible. The scope comes with a free sunshade, which is a nice touch given that this is something we normally have to buy separately. Another nice touch is that the mil dots on this scope are equalized at 10 magnification. A letter M instead of the number 10 on the magnification ring indicates this.

The AO and magnification ring are very smooth to operate with no tight spots at any point. Surprisingly for an 18 x Mag scope this one range finds reasonably accurately out to 50 yards. It will obviously never compete with the high Mag scopes in this department but this is not what it was designed to do.

The optics department is where this scope scores particularly highly. I have a Simmons 44 mag, which costs approximately the same as the Swift, and for the price I rate the Simmons highly in the optics department. However the Swift is significantly better. I have always felt that there was a gap in the quality (and price) of scopes between the likes of the Simmons and Leupold. I would say that this scope is far closer to Leupold than it would be to Simmons and similar quality scopes.

The sight picture is extremely bright, sharp and clear to the edges. The contrast and colour resolution are also excellent. This makes the mil dot reticule stand out really sharply in the sight picture. I was surprised at the amount of detail I could pick out in the foliage at distance on all magnifications. While we can all sometimes see pellets traveling to a target through a scope I found that this was a much more regular occurrence with the Swift in all light conditions. The optics are that good.

As a brief aside a friend of mine also bought an 8-32X50, which a group of us compared, to a 14-35 Premier Reticules boosted Leopold. The group was evenly split on which scope was better in terms of optics and significantly all agreed that there was little if any difference in the quality of the sight picture between the two scopes.

I particularly liked the mil dot reticule, which is fine and allows very precise aiming and tight grouping. I found that I was not able to shoot really tight groups with my Simmons at distance because of the thicker reticule. You can’t see the pellet mark you are aiming at.

I carried out two repeatability tests with the scope. The first was in still air conditions in a chicken house at 55 yards, I turned the elevation and windage turrets complete turns to print a square and found that I came back to zero exactly. I repeated this test with a CZ American .22lr at my zero range of 65 yards and again was able to print a perfect square with the scope coming exactly back to zero. In addition I dialed for ranges between 50 and 150 yards and the scope never faltered when coming back to zero. I have used this scope in terrible weather and have had no problems with fogging or zero shifts.

I have tried to pick fault with this scope but it is difficult especially at the price. It is certainly good value for the money and fills an obvious gap between the high-end expensive scopes and the more reasonably priced scopes. In terms of quality it is without a doubt nearer the high end than the low end. It is really that good but don’t take my word for it, look through one yourself. The scope comes with a lifetime guarantee and no quibble replacement policy.

Spanner.
06-09-2005, 08:10 AM
Is the reticule too fine for lamping?

Dave-H
06-09-2005, 08:42 AM
Is the reticule too fine for lamping?
And how much do they cost?
Rated for c/f rifle use?

triggerman
06-09-2005, 09:23 PM
Not at all, the reticule can be very clearly picked up when lamping, it is very sharp in the sight picture.

I think I paid about £175 for it I can't be exact as I also bought some other bits and pieces when I was there.

The website is www.ballymountfs.com which is stiil under construction though you could probably see the whole range at Swift's own site.

The guy I dealt with in Ballymount is Derek and and he is a sound bloke. His number is 00353868756754.

Trig :) :) :)

MikB
10-09-2005, 10:03 AM
I must confess, the light transmission worries me a bit, 80 - 82% :eek: my Nikon Bushmaster has 92% and is very good, the Elite range is 93% and the elite 4200 95% not sure how the image can be crisper and better than these with far less light transmission


I think you're obsessing on numbers a bit. There may well be no common standard on how such figures are measured, and any gross light transmission test would be likely to include out-of-focus 'wasted' light as well, something which Swift - at least in their highly regarded prismatic binoculars - take special measures not to transmit onward as it reduces clarity and colour contrast.

Regards,
MikB

paramaniac
11-09-2005, 07:34 AM
Hi Rob

Remember that the swift has a 44mm objective, 10% bigger than the Legend/4200 etc, so it's getting more light in to start with.

As for transmission percentages, i too am convinced thet some of the manafactures claims are optimistic.

I have had a squint through the Swift now, and am very impressed ;)

It is in a differant league to my Legend 5-15x40.

Skany
11-09-2005, 07:51 PM
Just won one on **** :D :D ideal!

New & unused £75 ideal got to come from the states but still a bargain!

Well if he posts it! :eek:

triggerman
12-09-2005, 09:07 PM
I agree with mikb on the claims about the light gathering ability of optics made by companies.

The best that I have here to compare it with is a Burris (with 44mm objective) which cost about 3 times as much.

Would I buy another burris or a Swift? Definetely the Swift.

Try and get you hands on a recent review in shooting sports that commented that the 8-32x44 was likened to a cross between a nightforce and a Leupold. I know that sounds hard to believe when it comes to optics but I guarantee that when you look through on you will be surprised.

Derek@ballymountfs.com is now doing mail order anywhere in the uk but try and get loooking through an 8-32x50 premier (£175) to see for yourself.

Trig :) :) :)

nishikigoi
22-09-2005, 09:07 PM
Just seen some at sheephouse shooting supplies (01628 771446), stunning and selling like hot cakes :) I'd grab one before inevetably the price goes up :rolleyes:

Rob there is a good guy to deal with, mention the BBS if you call. ;)

Skany
23-09-2005, 05:11 PM
ill post what mines like when it tuns up!

I only have a simons pro hunter to compare to but thats a lot better then the hawke i had & the various TASCOS AGS BSA stuff my mates use!

Andy