Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: How good is good enough to hunt...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    7,830

    How good is good enough to hunt...

    This is something that I've been thinking about for a while.

    The sensible consensus seems to be that your maximum hunting range given a particular shooting stance is the maximum distance you can consistently group your shots within a 1'' (25mm) circle.

    So mine for instance are:

    (in still, ideal conditions but unsupported)

    Standing 10 Yards ( )
    Kneeling 25 Yards
    Prone 45 Yards

    (and I mean stable versions of each position, not kneeling in a 1 in 3 hill for instance)

    as I said that's in still conditions - the greater the wind the closer my ranges get (my maximum ranges if I'd been hunting in the conditions that prevailed at BAGS would have been...oooh...about a yard ).

    Okay...so we have a nice still day (for example the kind of day we had at the UKAHFT Bisley shoot last year) and we see people consistently recording scores at UKAHFT rounds in their 30's.

    Well that's okay, great in fact, everybody has to start somewhere and HFT is a great 'place' to start and HFT is all about fun as well.

    But...

    A lot of these people are possibly hunting live quarry.

    Is this something to be concerned about?

    Okay, I hear a lot of people say that it's different when hunting.

    'I never wound quarry, when I hit an animal it's lights off'

    Maybe they mean it matters more so there's more focus. Perhaps just the fact that it's a living animal somehow raises the game in some psychological/mystical manner.

    Or is it perhaps in some cases that, what is thought to be a miss (after all you'd have to be pretty arrogant to say every shot you take always goes where you aimed it) is in fact a wounded animal, just boosted enough on adrenaline to get away?

    I don't think I have an answer BTW and I'm certainly not saying anybody who posts a 34 at a UKAHFT round should have their hunting kit taken off therm I just thought I'd ask what people thought.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    285
    When i hunt i only take the shot/s i feel comftable i can make (use a bipod and prone mosty) where as in HFT for example you are forced to diff positions etc so scores may be much lower than desired. Obviously didnt answer all your questions but this is my current input into the subject.
    "Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    7,621
    How many shots in an HFT comp? Around 60? All have to be taken from the peg.

    When I hunt I take maybe 3 or 4 shots max, I see many more bunnies that I know I can't hit, so I don't take the shot. In HFT you don't get that 'choice'.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SHEFFIELD,UK
    Posts
    2,624
    not shure what my long barrel t.d.r would do ,prob 1" groups at 65 yd's prone and bipod but i obviously wouldn't hunt at that range,
    standing, i can group into 1" at 20 yd's (average) sometimes better ,sometimes worse
    its not just about accuracy its also about power at the point of impact,

    i think thats right

    JASON..
    lots of takedowns

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    10,792
    we see people consistently recording scores at UKAHFT rounds in their 30's
    Never even been to one, but wonder could it be that some people are actually better shots without other people around?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    7,621
    Quote Originally Posted by Forth
    Never even been to one, but wonder could it be that some people are actually better shots without other people around?
    Good point, and those that aren't would probably not take the more difficult shots, they'd manouver into a better/closer position, like I do. HFT is a good sport, but shouldn't be confused with real hunting.

  7. #7
    baxterbasics Guest
    You already have your answer
    In the field,if the shots not on,you don`t take it. In competition,you don`t take the shot,you get Nil Points.
    When hunting,i take 90% of my shots Kneeling-always have-shooting at clubs/comps has certainly increased my competance in the field

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,448
    Well, on the plus side I think all this HFT shooting will result in far better shooting and less woundings - I know my range estimation has got much better as a result..
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lowestoft, Suffolk, GB
    Posts
    356
    re: other post...

    http://oldbluejacket.com/CarlosHathcock.htm

    Probably good enough I'd say!
    1980-something Gamo Cadet .177 (removes skin from rice pudding...just)
    2006-SMK Cheapy Underlever .177 (Realtree'd with cheapy scope)
    200?-AAS200 .22 w. 3x9x40
    200?-BSA Lightning w. Nikko SC 3x9x40 .22 w. Gas Ram (best all rounder ever?)
    2006- Walther Redhawks .177 (2)
    2005-Daystate Mk3 deluxe .177 w. hawke 6.5x20x50
    1970-Diana G34 .22 For sale!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    7,830
    Quote Originally Posted by baxterbasics
    You already have your answer
    Do I? Then why did you post?

    Great input so far...Especially the one about the number of shots. Of course if you test something fallible (like we all are, especially me ) 30 times then you'll get more fails than if you test something 3 or 4 times.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The building site, hopelessly congested Krakow of the Midlands...Banbury
    Posts
    964
    Hi,

    and interesting point raised, baxterbasics is right, most shots in the field are taken kneeling I'd say. I can't recall taking a shot at closer than about 25 yards and wouldn't take one at much over 30, so my range of technique is much narrower than that called for in hft.
    I'm a good shot in the field and practice what I'll need - kneeling shots at 25-30 yards, I have markers to check distances to as a warm up and my airgun is zeroed for these distances specifically. If I ever did it this wouldn't necessarily make me good at Hft though as its disciplines are wider.

    hope this helps


    muttley

  12. #12
    Gary C Guest
    Old chestnut.

    Hunting is 2 sports - Stalking and Target shooting. You stalk then shoot at a target.

    The thought that people shoot better hunting than at targets makes me laugh..as if some mythica ability is endowed when you're alone. . Nobody sees you miss.

    The first test is your ability to group as above.
    2nd is to group as above with wind
    3rd is to group NOT knowing you range.

    I hunt with FAC and as such can shoot out to 75 yards in perfect conditions BUT need a rangefinder for this. "Free" hunting I'm out to 55 to 60 yards tops.

    Woundings occur. All you can do is minimise them

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    10,792
    The thought that people shoot better hunting than at targets makes me laugh..as if some mythica ability is endowed when you're alone. . Nobody sees you miss.
    Gary, I cannot say re effect on other people, but if you (or anyone else unknown) were standing (out of my sight) behind me while I aimed - yes, it could be off-putting.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    peterboring
    Posts
    18,893
    got to go along with gary c here. to a point. i like to hunt alone. as the man said, no-one sees you miss.
    but wont take a shot I am not happy with. if my telescopic sight says yes and i say no, then its a non shot.
    most of my young shooting was prone with the two lee enfields.
    now it is mostly standing with the sprigy thingy and the pcp.
    and forth, comping with the lee enfeilds, i did used to feel uncomfortable with people watching. that included the referee.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    3,487
    I agree with Gary to an extent...

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary C
    The thought that people shoot better hunting than at targets makes me laugh..as if some mythica ability is endowed when you're alone. . Nobody sees you miss.
    There's probably an element of bulls hit when you hear people saying they never miss while hunting but then put in a low score at HFT. There is definately a psychological element in target shooting that isn't there when hunting. Part of that is down to the fact that other people are watching.

    There's also the fact that in HFT you have no choice but to take the shot. A 45 yarder in a stiff crosswind isn't a shot that I'd attempt while out hunting but you have no choice in HFT.

    It's hard to say how many dropped points those factors would equate to on an HFT course, but I'd certainly say that if you're getting a score of 30 on a 30 target UKAHFT course (max score of 60) then you need lots more practice before you even think about going hunting.

    Should we be concerned? No I don't think so, in fact quite the opposite.
    When you speak to someone that's just come off an HFT course with a lower than average score the first thing they'll admit to themselves is that they need more practice and that's definately a good thing.

Similar Threads

  1. Good Deal, Good Guy
    By Gary Foster in forum General Airgun.
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-05-2005, 11:43 AM
  2. GOOD OR BAD
    By mark 1 in forum General Airgun.
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-01-2004, 06:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •