A/A pellets B/C

[longrapid]

does any one know the B/C of the A/A field and also the hunter,and even better do they also know the B/C of these after they have been launched out of a barrel.
cheers
kevG

[BuddyBoy]

Yep <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_wink.gif" alt="Wink" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

AA Hunter were 0.022, AA Fields were 0.032 / 34 (depends on gun/power)

These are all my actuall tested figures - from your favourite guns <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_wink.gif" alt="Wink" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

Use the fields mate,

JB

[Numb Nut]

BCs are calibre specific! Buddyboy is talking about 0.22, the 0.177 BCs are generally lower.

Some BCs listed at:
http://www.computer4me.com/airgunlinks/bctables.cfm

[longrapid]

cheers very much for that jon,i thougt you would know <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_wink.gif" alt="Wink" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->i do normaly use the field,but i have just got a new barrel that loves the hunters more than the field,but my guess would be the feild have a better B/C than hunters,well the hunters are droping 1/2" lower at 45 yds. and very sorry forgot to mention cal .22
kevG

[BuddyBoy]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Numb Nut:
BCs are calibre specific! Buddyboy is talking about 0.22, the 0.177 BCs are generally lower.

Some BCs listed at:
<A HREF="http://www.computer4me.com/airgunlinks/bctables.cfm[/quote]" TARGET=_blank>http://www.computer4me.com/airgunlinks/bctables.cfm[/quote]</A>

Kev is a .22 bloke <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_razz.gif" alt="Razz" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

[longrapid]

<img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="Big Grin" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:--> <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="Big Grin" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:--> yep,i would rather be a .22 bloke than a .177 woman <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_razz.gif" alt="Razz" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:--> <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_wink.gif" alt="Wink" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:--> or a .20 bio
kevG

[shadow11ray]

Do you still get up to PARC Kev' <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

Ray <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_cool.gif" alt="Cool" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

[longrapid]

no ray,i keep meaning to re join,but its getting the time, lme going to have to make the efort though as its a smashing club.
kevG

[BuddyBoy]

BTW Kev,

Fields vs hunters is about 1/2 a FP diff at 45 yards.

Normally I've found when hunters work best, it's either 'cos they like the smaller size (5.5 instead of 5.51/5.52), or the crown of the barrel is not A1.

ATB - JB

[longrapid]

hi jon just got back in after a few hours testing,the field have the edge as regards grouping,and as you say they fly a little flatter,very nice still night here for testing.
kevG

[Bulsaye]

BC's are not only caliber specific, but gun specific, and velocity is a factor. Theoretically at least, if Gun A shoots pellet X at a certain power level, and gun B shoots pellet X at a different level.. their BC's will be somewhat different. The only way to know the TRUE bc of pellet X in your gun is to do the math. Anything else would only be an approximation. RBest

[richness]

It is very good indeed in .22 - around .034 I believe, and it really does show downrange.
Actually, I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that AA Fields are the best pellet design in the universe. <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

[longrapid]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Richard Utting:
It is very good indeed in .22 - around .034 I believe, and it really does show downrange.
Actually, I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that AA Fields are the best pellet design in the universe. <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->[/quote]

now if some one could just make them out of tin <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

kevG

[shadow11ray]

Well has any one tried them side by side in a PCP and side by side in a srpringer?

I think AA say, Field's for PC and Hunters for springer. They are deffinitely two diferent pell's

I feel a tad happier with hunters in my TX @30/40, but thats off my knee and not sure out to 45/55.

Having said that I didn't adjust my scope to allow for the 1/2" Kev'.

More work needed.

I use .22 as well Kev'.

Ray <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_cool.gif" alt="Cool" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->

[atheo]

A while back,the most raved about pellet was the AA Hunter with Field taking the back seat.Now its the other way around! <img src="http://jsramsbottom.co.uk/bbs/e/icon_rolleyes.gif" alt="Roll Eyes" width="15" height="15"><!--graemlin:-->