Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Shot to Shot variation – what’s good enough?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    St Helens, Merseyside
    Posts
    7,343

    Question Shot to Shot variation – what’s good enough?

    Shot to Shot from a PCP. This is not the PC power curve just the fluctuation between one shot and the next.

    Example

    600 ± 10FPS max to min of 20FPS
    600 ±5 FPS max to min of 10FPS
    600 ±2.5FPS max to min of 5 FPS

    Very few of the top class PCPs can consistently manage to retune ± 2.5 FPS


    So what do you all think?


    I’m inclined to think ±10FPS is too much.


    Regards Ora

  2. #2
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,272
    Stick to a well lubricated, well sprung springer.

  3. #3
    kevG is offline Longest unaltered member...
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    doncaster,south yorkshire
    Posts
    6,353
    i think its a peace of mind thing,10 fps shot to shot consistency is plenty good anough,ive shot guns with around 20 fps s s c v and they have grouped just as well as 5 fps s s c v guns.must admit i like mine around 5 fps,but thats just a peace of minde thing,of course you can alow more variation on a .177 calibre as its a % thing.alot of fings aint tha

    kevG

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NEWCASTLE- U- LYME
    Posts
    4,268
    Quote Originally Posted by ora8i
    Shot to Shot from a PCP. This is not the PC power curve just the fluctuation between one shot and the next.

    Example

    600 ± 10FPS max to min of 20FPS
    600 ±5 FPS max to min of 10FPS
    600 ±2.5FPS max to min of 5 FPS

    Very few of the top class PCPs can consistently manage to retune ± 2.5 FPS


    So what do you all think?


    I’m inclined to think ±10FPS is too much.


    Regards Ora
    with.177 weighed pellets I get 40 SHOTS +/- 3FPS With a pcp, +/- 2fps with my springer unweighed= pcp=+/- 6fps, spring= 6 fps, i am happy with+/- 10fps in .177
    Last edited by 99CLOMP; 25-08-2006 at 02:46 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Bolton,Lancs
    Posts
    11,147
    Hi Alan,
    I'd be happy with the +/- 5 fpe.
    With the variation in pellet weights you get in a tin you wouldn't notice it.

    Unless your going to go to the trouble of getting it closer and weighing all your pellets I think a variation of 10fpe is O.K. Point of impact is going to vary very little.

    ATB
    Ray.

  6. #6
    verminhunter is offline The founder of the FAC .25 Big Boys Fan club
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    enfield london
    Posts
    6,493
    Quote Originally Posted by ora8i
    Shot to Shot from a PCP. This is not the PC power curve just the fluctuation between one shot and the next.

    Example

    600 ± 10FPS max to min of 20FPS
    600 ±5 FPS max to min of 10FPS
    600 ±2.5FPS max to min of 5 FPS

    Very few of the top class PCPs can consistently manage to retune ± 2.5 FPS


    So what do you all think?


    I’m inclined to think ±10FPS is too much.


    Regards Ora











    Perfect,nothing wrong at all with 10fps variation,iwont shift your poi one bit.Yes you can say there's better like 3fps or 5fps but so what? anything like 20fps and 30 fps then you might want to have a look at the rifle but 10fps is perfectly fine mate dont worry.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    St Helens, Merseyside
    Posts
    7,343

    Raider

    I’m setting up my Raider, I probably getting about ±3 FPS variation but I’m using these figures to work out the length of the heart of fill.

    http://www.ora8i.rivington-riflemen....end%20line.gif

    and showing just the trend lines for 3 different transfer port IDs

    http://www.ora8i.rivington-riflemen....rend-lines.gif

    and from the trends
    Working off the Trend Lines the curve for the 2.2 mm ID transfer port is obviously the worst and I have discounted it.

    Results for the 2.2mm ID Transfer Port

    • About 44 shots within ± 5FPS
    • About 30 shots within ±2.5 FPS


    Results for the 2.0mm ID Transfer Port

    • About 77 shots within ± 5 FPS
    • About 46 shots within ± 2.5 FPS


    Results for the 1.8mm ID Transfer Port

    • About 84 shots within ± 5 FPS
    • About 53 shots within ± 2.5 FPS

    I think this will get burried so I'll start a new thread about calculating shot to shot variance on a curve.


    Regards Ora

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    2,659
    You aren't gonna notice the difference if you get a total variation of 15fps over a charge/course of fire. My Mk3 gives 150+ shots with a total variation of 10-15fps, my Walther Dominator gives 100 shots with a similar variation.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cradley Heath
    Posts
    1,816
    I was always led to believe that anything under a 25fps deviation is perfectly acceptable for target work.
    I play a Fender bass, I shoot a springer. I like things to be, well, dependable

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    3,487
    Variation at the muzzle isn't the important factor. It's downrange where it counts.

    A large variation at the muzzle can be an indicator of a potential problem, but if the gun groups well at the distance you want to shoot at, then forget the chrono readings.

    Very often with too much chrono'ing you can end up chasing a problem that doesn't exist ( and they're the hardest to cure )

  11. #11
    Herx77 is offline "Instruments of the light"
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Body boarding centre of Hertfordshire
    Posts
    1,666
    Quote Originally Posted by ora8i
    Shot to Shot from a PCP. This is not the PC power curve just the fluctuation between one shot and the next.

    Example

    600 ± 10FPS max to min of 20FPS
    600 ±5 FPS max to min of 10FPS
    600 ±2.5FPS max to min of 5 FPS

    Very few of the top class PCPs can consistently manage to retune ± 2.5 FPS


    So what do you all think?


    I’m inclined to think ±10FPS is too much.


    Regards Ora
    Nice to be within a small tolerance range, but what does it do on the range. One does not ensure the other? Better to ensure accuracy than paper results. color=red] HERX77 [/color]
    Fighter against the "Dark Arts" A stranger in an even stranger land.
    GC2+Leupold 14.4-34x45
    AA400 fac receiver+sidewinder 8.5-34x52
    Weihrauch HW77k fiddled with and doing what it wants to +Zeiss 3-9x36.
    Weihrauch HW90k
    Weihrauch HW97k learning from above,now sporting a Maccarri 77/97 target stock..+Bushnell 3200.Go on shoot one you know you want to
    Daystate mk3 RT Delux + bushnell 4200 8-24x 40Does what it should again & again.
    Fwb 124 + Optima was good is good!
    Webley Vulcan.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,477
    plus or minus 10 and I don't get worry

    Most of my gun s(springer or PCP) give a total variation of about 15fps, (plus or minus 7.5 fps), and all group veryy well..

    Go with the 2mm port
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    St Helens, Merseyside
    Posts
    7,343
    Planning to go with the 2mm and reduce the pre-load a bit.

    How has the Falcon with the soldered port stood up to prolonged use? It’s solder job that is in it now but I have managed to get a bit of Brass in case the solder doesn’t last.


    Regards Ora

  14. #14
    Fluffybuck is offline Member of the .25 cal fan club
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    8,343
    I look for about +/- 1% velocity (+/-2% energy).
    Equating to:
    .177: 800ft/sec: within +/- 8ft/sec
    .20: 700ft/sec: within +/- 7ft/sec
    .22: 600ft/sec: within +/- 6ft/sec
    .25: 500ish ft/sec: +/- 5ft/sec.

    Just my thoughts......
    .

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    2,659
    Quote Originally Posted by ora8i
    Planning to go with the 2mm and reduce the pre-load a bit.

    How has the Falcon with the soldered port stood up to prolonged use? It’s solder job that is in it now but I have managed to get a bit of Brass in case the solder doesn’t last.


    Regards Ora
    Have you tried Silver Solder, it will stand the blast no problem.

Similar Threads

  1. Hornet - shot to shot velocity variation
    By gravity sucks in forum General Airgun.
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 14-06-2005, 10:38 PM
  2. This should make you a good shot
    By â™  Andyman in forum General Airgun.
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-09-2003, 04:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •