Hi can any body tell me the differences between these two fine AA creations.
I already know about the shroud and anti bear-trap notches as I wear glasses .
Is the power plant stroke and diameter the same? and what other differences are there.
Come on lads there must be some knowledgeable chaps out there.
My reason for the question is that tx200 are rare these parts and whilst I have always wanted a MKIII a MK II has become available so I need to know the pro's and con's to make an informed decision.
Try a search. Lots of people prefer the Mk2 to the Mk3 'cos the shorter stroke gives a slightly faster lock time. I've got a Mk3.
The ox is slow, but the earth is patient.
The MK2 is a fine rifle, I'd have no hesitation in buying another one if mine was lost.Originally Posted by ghce
As Gwylan says, some people prefer the MK2 to the MK3 because of the shorter stroke, but cocking effort can be high.
Some of the top springer shooters here use the MK2, and so do I .
i sold my mk3 to get another mk2 just a better feel of a gun i dont know why i just like the mk2 but both very good guns
I Am Also Part Of The YCHJCYA2PDTHFH Club On This Forum