Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Webley Mk 3 - Sights & performance

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Sussex, Nr Rye
    Posts
    17,270
    I first started with a MKIII in .22 and have one now fitted with a Tasco 1.75? x40, a classic combo circa 1979. They group fine out to 20m or so but I've never had one that could compare to the accuracy of a HW or Sport. Sorry, just don't think much of them. But for their original purpose of shooting with open sights around the farmyard they do the job fine; not that I do that anymore as I use more modern stuff.

    At open sight ranges they are as good as anything.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,112
    Does anyone know the price of the MK3 compared to an Airsporter when introduced.

    Don't get me wrong I own a couple of MK 3's and a couple of early Airsporters and love them to bits. The thing is when I start comparing the two makes side by side and inside out the Webley looks a bit sad compared to the Airsporter. I'm not calling the MK3 as I think they're a very well made gun and should last forever, it's just that the Airsporter was a bit more technically advanced, hence the question on pricing.

    All the best Mick

  3. #3
    Sam Vimes is offline Vanquished a Weihrauch evangelist with a gasram
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Richmond, North Yorkshire.
    Posts
    9,529
    Quote Originally Posted by T 20 View Post
    it's just that the Airsporter was a bit more technically advanced
    How? I can understand that it looked a little more modern, particularly in the latter marks but how was it more technically advanced?
    Fabricatum diem, pvnc!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Vimes View Post
    How? I can understand that it looked a little more modern, particularly in the latter marks but how was it more technically advanced?
    Hi Sam

    Self opening loading tap.
    Underlever within the woodwork.
    Longer underlever for less effort on the cocking stroke.
    Conical headed piston to allow a shorter transfer port to be used.
    New trigger design compared to the Lincoln pattern.

    Just bits and bobs like that.

    All the best Mick

  5. #5
    edbear2 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by T 20 View Post
    Does anyone know the price of the MK3 compared to an Airsporter when introduced.all the best Mick
    HI Mick.......In 1958, in the same Parker Hale Catalogue, The mark 3 was £15.5.6d, and the Airsporter / Club Airsporter (both same price!) was £16.11.8d

    Mark3

    Airsporter(s)

    regards, Ed

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,112
    Quote Originally Posted by edbear2 View Post
    HI Mick.......In 1958, in the same Parker Hale Catalogue, The mark 3 was £15.5.6d, and the Airsporter / Club Airsporter (both same price!) was £16.11.8d

    Mark3

    Airsporter(s)

    regards, Ed
    Cheers Ed

    I think I'd have spent the extra 14 shilling and tuppence and had the Airsporter then.


    The Webley MK3 being a copy of a copy of a Lincoln Jeffries, the Airsporter being an improved Lincoln Jeffries.

    Thanks again


    All the best Mick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •