Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Can I shoot my air rifle in my garden

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    3,392
    Quote Originally Posted by weevie View Post
    Ignore the ASBO comment.
    Someone will probably post talking about 50 feet from any public highway. Ignore it, the offence is only complete if you endanger, interrupt or alarm a member of the public on that highway. With your walls and being in your back garden you shouldn't have any problem with that.
    Don't ignore the 50 foot rule at all.

    You should not fire the gun from within 50ft of the centre of any road etc.

    If you do and you even "alarm" someone - then you are committing and offence as Weevie says.

    There is an excellent web site here <Click>


    It contains the following snippet :-
    It is also an offence to discharge a firearm, including an airgun, within 50 feet of the centre of any highway. This includes roads, bridle-paths or public footpaths. The offence is complete if a member of the public is injured, endangered or even just alarmed by the incident.

    So - you can either follow the advice of the Met Police or you can ignore it as Weevie says.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bath, innit?
    Posts
    6,700
    I've always wondered about the 50 ft rule.

    I plink in my garage on ocassion, with air pistols. Its within 50 ft of the road, but obviously no one in the right mind could be endangered, interrupted or alarmed. (the garage door is shut)

    I think the same must go for back garden shooting. Is it even possible that someone on the pavement at the front of your house could be "alarmed" by you shooting in your back garden? Even Walter the Softie ought to be OK.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    A sleepy village Nr Skipton, a bit like Royston Va
    Posts
    3,417
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Cornelius View Post
    I've always wondered about the 50 ft rule.

    I plink in my garage on ocassion, with air pistols. Its within 50 ft of the road, but obviously no one in the right mind could be endangered, interrupted or alarmed. (the garage door is shut)

    I think the same must go for back garden shooting. Is it even possible that someone on the pavement at the front of your house could be "alarmed" by you shooting in your back garden? Even Walter the Softie ought to be OK.
    According to some experts which includes certain ex celebrity television stuffed rabbits , the 50 ft rule only applies to vehicular roads and not paths, towpaths, bridleways, snickets etc and only if Joe public feels endangered and complains. This maybe the case, dependent on what interpretation of the rules and what website publishes their interpretation, however, my simple rule is stay ensure that you are 50ft away from any public access area where Mr, Mrs or Miss Public would feel endangered.

    Oh, and what a man does in the privacy of his garage behind locked doors is none of our business
    AA 410k, 3-9X50
    FN19 Hawke, 6-18x44
    AA S200, 6-24X50
    S10, 8-32X50

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    7,830
    Sorry, maybe I was a bit dismisive of the 50ft rule but people often post on here about it and only refer to the distance without mentioning the rest of the rule. That can mislead and could mean people missing out on being able to shoot in their garden.

    There's enough restriction in this country without our adding imaginary constraints to it.

    The important bit of the rule is:

    The offence is complete if a member of the public is injured, endangered or even just alarmed by the incident

    If you can avoid causing injury, endagerment or alarm to people on the highway you're less than 50 ft from then you should shoot.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    N. Hants
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveH View Post
    Don't ignore the 50 foot rule at all.

    You should not fire the gun from within 50ft of the centre of any road etc.

    If you do and you even "alarm" someone - then you are committing and offence as Weevie says.

    There is an excellent web site here <Click>


    It contains the following snippet :-
    It is also an offence to discharge a firearm, including an airgun, within 50 feet of the centre of any highway. This includes roads, bridle-paths or public footpaths. The offence is complete if a member of the public is injured, endangered or even just alarmed by the incident.

    So - you can either follow the advice of the Met Police or you can ignore it as Weevie says.
    The met would rather NO ONE has ANY kind of firearm. The Police in general also like to interpret firearms law to suit them selves. Public footpaths and bridleways are not highways
    Have a look at
    http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/news...s-Guidance.pdf Section 22.17. Which is a much better website (IMHO!)
    Instance of Police applying their own rules was the letter my son got with his first SC.(at age 14) "Until his is 15 he must shoot with you". Wrong, anyone over the age of 21. "Between 15 & 18 he may not shoot on his own" Wrong he can shoot on his own at 15.
    What gets me is that despite the Home Office publishing such good info for them to use, some Forces give out such BS

    Larrya

  6. #6
    sniper22 Guest
    once again weevil see the link above and interpret the following "The offence is complete if a member of the public is injured, endangered or even just alarmed by the incident."

    where i live on a large council estate (not a chav though) i and the local police would interpret this as if a next door neighbour complains they will act upon it.

    as for ignoring the 50ft rule, why not ignore the lot and have 40ft/lb gun too off ticket.

  7. #7
    Acid House is offline Rivi's very own Shrek (and Coronation Street fan).
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    North Manchester
    Posts
    1,285
    ......oops ..
    Last edited by Acid House; 03-04-2007 at 06:16 PM. Reason: missunderstanding
    Enlightenment is only a click away http://www.rivington-riflemen.org
    If a man talks in the woods and nobody hears him, is he still wrong?

  8. #8
    sniper22 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Acid House View Post
    Kettle, pot, black
    The things that spring to mind
    meaning what exactly?

    libel is the word that springs to mind here - carry on mate.
    Last edited by sniper22; 02-04-2007 at 08:33 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    Posts
    362
    I'd second the comment about having a word with your neighbours. It's not a legal necessity, but a quiet, friendly word of explanation is less hassle than a reported firearms incident. Maybe invite them to have a go, or see your set up.

    Remember, to the layman, a gun is a gun, and they'd be quite entitled to be alarmed, in the absence of any more information. It could also be worth letting your local Plod know when you're shooting. They'll give you an incident number, which you can shout at the armed response team if they get called out.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cornwall UK
    Posts
    970
    If you can't be seen from the road then shooting within 50 ft. of the road centre would be no problem as no-one could say they have been alarmed as they could not have seen you, so long as sudden noise does not come into it. I would imagine using a steel backstop within a few yards could cause alarm.

    But even if you are firing directly away from the edge of your property where the road is so that safety is not an issue, it only needs a passer-by to see you with rifle or pistol to be frightened and voilà you have broken the law.

    It has been said often enough on here as to how so many people are having a funny turn at seeing a four year old with a cap gun, so I don't suppose it is that far from possible that you could be reported.

    The problem is that what most people would think unlikely to cause concern is not the point. It is whether the one person doing the reporting says they were alarmed. If they are anti-gun then they can easily say they were alarmed even when it sounds silly to anyone else!
    MikeB

    RWS C225 (Black) , Gamo Red Dot
    Walther CP88 (Wood/Nickel) , Gamo Red Dot
    Crosman 1377 3-9*50 JSR
    AA 410 TDR 6-24*56 Nikko
    BSA Meteor .22 I've had for 43 years!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tewkesbury Glos.
    Posts
    3,540
    Quote Originally Posted by GHMikeB View Post
    If you can't be seen from the road then shooting within 50 ft. of the road centre would be no problem as no-one could say they have been alarmed as they could not have seen you, so long as sudden noise does not come into it. I would imagine using a steel backstop within a few yards could cause alarm.

    But even if you are firing directly away from the edge of your property where the road is so that safety is not an issue, it only needs a passer-by to see you with rifle or pistol to be frightened and voilà you have broken the law.

    It has been said often enough on here as to how so many people are having a funny turn at seeing a four year old with a cap gun, so I don't suppose it is that far from possible that you could be reported.

    The problem is that what most people would think unlikely to cause concern is not the point. It is whether the one person doing the reporting says they were alarmed. If they are anti-gun then they can easily say they were alarmed even when it sounds silly to anyone else!
    When I was a kid when we went out with our Cap Pistols folks would say:
    Cute, they are playing Cowboys & Indians.
    Now they pick up their mobile phones and call in the armed fast response units! HELL, where do I play Cowboys & Indians now dammit?
    Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end.”

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bury St Edmunds
    Posts
    63
    Thank you all for your replies. I cannot be seen from the road but by the houses behind my garden.The gun,which is yet to reach me this week, has a silencer fitted.There is enough backstop and the pellets will not go beyond the target.My neighbours,they frankly do not care about my existence and are out during the daytime which is when I intend to plink a bit.Still,as you mentioned,will check with them.Only thing is,I can be seen aiming the AR by the people in the houses behind mine and they may think that I am aiming at them.Will have to find a way of not being seen.Thank you all once again.

    Best-
    Locksley

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,211
    The original question has, I think, been answered, and the thread is going nowhere but downhill, so it's locked.

    Jim

  14. #14
    sniper22 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Acid House View Post
    Kettle, pot, black
    The things that spring to mind
    this post may lead readers to suspect either i or members of my club use unlicenced firearms. may i suggest this post be deleted or backed up by fact not fiction if any inference is made. if any comments you may have on the subject might be posted in public so my solicitor can examine the facts prior to libel action being taken.

  15. #15
    Acid House is offline Rivi's very own Shrek (and Coronation Street fan).
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    North Manchester
    Posts
    1,285
    It seems three words posted by myself have created something of a stir. These three words although innocuous in there own right have been misunderstood to some extent and I therefore have retracted the offending post. My apologies to Tony and ‘his’ club. If anyone understood this post as an accusation of illegalities toward any current or past air gun enthusiasts then I can without fear of retribution, confirm wholeheartedly that at no time was this the intention.
    The three words I used in reference to Tony’s post was in relation to the people or persons on the aforementioned corporation owned affordable housing scheme that would inform the appropriate authorities, weather legal shooting was being enjoyed or not (and as if they don’t get up to a few not quite legal pastimes themselves).

    Or for those hard of thinking..

    I was agreeing with you Tony you daft bat.
    Enlightenment is only a click away http://www.rivington-riflemen.org
    If a man talks in the woods and nobody hears him, is he still wrong?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •