Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Question..

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,222
    I take it one off this forum has posed the question on MLAGB

    http://www.mlagb.com/cgi/yabb/YaBB.p...num=1180682940

    Still not 100% clear.

    Where is it written in an official doocument to cover the firers @ss.
    “If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?” :- Prince Philip said after Dunblane

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,720
    Hi

    If it is held on a shotgun certificate you may only load and fire it with a shot load containing five or more projectiles non of which exceed .36" in diameter.

    If it is held on a firearms certificate you may shoot it with solid ball and/or shot but only as per the specific conditions of you FAC.

    If it is held on your FAC you do not need any authority to purchase/manufacture or possess projectiles/balls/bullets for it as these are not classed as complete rounds of ammunition.

    Cheers

    Lee

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,222
    Not according to the post on MLAGB forum. They are saying it was debated with the Home Office who say its a smooth bore m/l on SGC and you can stuff a ball down it.

    Not arguing, as I said I dont know. There are these silly anomalies in the licencing and we are expected to have an encyclopedic knowledge or face jail and a lifetime ban on ownership.

    I have one I'm thrashing out with ACPO at the moment. A parlour pistol with a 4mm bore fired by percussion cap alone, is it a muzzle loaded sec 1? Is it section 2 as a smooth bore though firing a single projectile? Is it an airgun due to low muzzle energy of sub 3ft/lb? Is it obsolete calibre despite being modern manufacure?
    Last edited by Smokeless Coal; 01-06-2007 at 12:21 PM.
    “If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?” :- Prince Philip said after Dunblane

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,720
    Hi
    If you load it with a solid ball it is not a shotgun. You need it on your FAC.
    I took advice on exactly this scenario when renewing an FAC holders ticket several years ago.
    I'm retired now but as far as I am aware the law has not changed

    Re the parlour pistol. You say its modern manufacture so no Section 58 exemption then. (Modern is held to be manufactured after 1939).
    In the first instance it is definately not a Section 2 firearm as it will have a barrel less than 24 inches.
    Is it capable of inflicting a lethal injury? (This held to be in excess of 1 joule). If yes then it is a lethal barreled weapon and therefore a firearm.
    It is most certainly not an airgun as the means of propulsion is the chemical reaction/gas effect of an exploding percussion cap and not compressed air /CO 2 etc.
    It is therefore a section 1 muzzle loading pistol and must be entered on your FAC if you want to shoot it!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,222
    A friend had to classify some zimmer shutezen held by the Imperial War museum. Granted they were antiques but had to be tested and classified for some reason.
    They have an 8" barrel and fired flobert caps, all produced under 6ft/lb so were designated airguns. An explosion creates a compressed gas in a confined space. The release of gas create MV within the range of an airgun.
    “If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?” :- Prince Philip said after Dunblane

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,720
    All I can say is .... get in in writing from your FEO.
    I've seen more than one decent person dragged through the courts because of 'misunderstandings' in relation to personal interpretations of the various Firearms Acts by those who should know better!!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,222
    Its lodged with an RFD awaiting written result from ACPO.
    “If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?” :- Prince Philip said after Dunblane

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •