Both will do the job admirably at these ranges.
I would choose the the HW90 in .22, the faster lock time/recoil should proove to be an advantage.
Both will do the job admirably at these ranges.
I would choose the the HW90 in .22, the faster lock time/recoil should proove to be an advantage.
I have a hw 90 fac in .22 and cannot think of a better hunting gun , of the spring/ ram type. If you want to target shoot then the 97 is probably better but for hunting the 90 is the dogs dangleys! Hope this helps.
rather have the hw95,hw35k or the hw80k purely down to the better trigger/safety.
Considering getting rid of my hw97k because of the fiddly loading and the weight. I have arms like an orang-utan because of it.
May change it for a 95
Thank God I'm an Atheist
95k-177-SR6 / Evo-20-Tasco Varmint / Supersport- 22-custom open sights. 97k-177 for sale
Hi and thanks for the input I think I'l go for the hw90 in .22 (stick with what I know)
The rifle I'm interested in costs £290 and includes 3-9x40 scope (can't remember the make), and is also fitted with a screw on silencer.
Does this seem a reasonable price.
Once again thanks everyone for the help.
Steve
£300 would buy you a s/h s200 and a pump, much nicer, imo to hunt with.
had my HW90 stolen and i bought a S200 and hated it, power curve,always filling it, too light, not easy to load at night.
get the HW90, brilliant guns