Results 1 to 15 of 203

Thread: Long range airgun shooting

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Graham2 is offline Slightly camp, makes decent chilli, and has a box of tissues and a can of 3 In 1 in the gun room
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sidcup, Kent, The Garden Of England
    Posts
    3,191
    I was sad to see the original thread deleted, as it was very interesting, and I wanted to hear more about Harry's claims. I realise he may have stepped out of line, but plenty of others were insulting from the off, but he remained pretty civil despite it all. I feel that his experiments could be valuable to all shooters, as it's only by pushing the envelope that things change for the better. Who knows, maybe his local weather conditions are the key to this type of shooting. There's a world of difference between this draughty, damp island and his. However, we won't know if his location is the key, not on here anyway. PS Terry, when did you try for the 100 yard groups, and what pellets were you using?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bembridge, Isle of Wight
    Posts
    1,244
    Interesting discussion this - I think, if you pick the bones out of the sceptics argument, you will find that they are not denying that sub inch 100 yard groups (or 1.5" 150 yards FAC) are technically achievable. Stands to sense if you put enough pellets down range in five shot groups on a perfect day, eventually (after a few days) you'll get some to group under the magic inch. I expect this is what the long-shooting weekend will show.

    BUT the real deal with this is that you are simply shooting a small number of shots at a fixed point and then landing the pellets in a group on a sheet of paper. It demonstrates the ability of your equipment more than anything else. What is in considerable doubt is the ability to consistently land pellets on a specific target at these ranges i.e. reading the wind over this distance and making an individual adjustment to each shot to land it in a bullseye in a group under one inch. As the original poster indicated, he needed 150 shots to land 10 in a group on his paper. Sniper Wolf did some brilliant shooting but as stated by Buddy Boy, his group was nearly 2".

    Is it possible to achieve sub 1 inch groups consistently whilst also landing your shots on a specific target area with a sub 12ft lb rifle? I don't think so.

    I'd love to be wrong, but I've got to agree with Terry, Gary and Ben, wind is the factor, and not just wind, breeze, light breeze and even the slightest shift in the air. It will take your pellets left and right or up and down and, while they may still group, they will not land consistently on the target.

    This is why Harry ruffled so many feathers, he claimed to be able to combine grouping at range with pin-point accuracy on a target area and then use this skill to take down live prey. I'm not dismissing his claims because I am not able to make a judgement on the weather conditions in an elevated location in Australia but I very much doubt he would be able to demonstrate his findings in this country.

    Looking forward to seeing where this one goes!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    24,739
    Quote Originally Posted by figjam View Post
    ... i dont shoot above 80 yds with an air rifle, and i dont have a FAC rated one to try, but if a sub 12ft/lb rifle can consistantly and humanly drop quarry at 80 yds and below then i dont disbelieve that a weapon with almost X3 the power cant do it!
    Erm...can we clarify this point before it all kicks off, Kenny?

    Are you saying you shoot live quarry out to 80 yards with a sub-12 rifle?

    Sorry if I've misconstrued, I've been up since 5 am.

    All the best.

  4. #4
    Born Again Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry D View Post
    Erm...can we clarify this point before it all kicks off, Kenny?

    Are you saying you shoot live quarry out to 80 yards with a sub-12 rifle?

    Sorry if I've misconstrued, I've been up since 5 am.

    All the best.
    A valid point, but are you highlighting it to deflect attention from the subject of Harry ?

    Just asking, like.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    24,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Born Again View Post
    A valid point, but are you highlighting it to deflect attention from the subject of Harry ?

    Just asking, like.
    Why would I do that, Brian?

    I'm highlighting it to avoid confusion. Clarification helps on that front, surely?

  6. #6
    Born Again Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry D View Post
    Why would I do that, Brian?
    Why indeed, I'm at a loss as to why there has been such vilification of Harry.

    Why not restore the thread with the abusive bits cut out and lock it, then we can put an end to all the misquotes and misunderstandings.

  7. #7
    Gary C Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Born Again View Post
    Why indeed, I'm at a loss as to why there has been such vilification of Harry.

    Why not restore the thread with the abusive bits cut out and lock it, then we can put an end to all the misquotes and misunderstandings.
    What's the point Brian? there will then be accusations of thread doctoring to put him in a bad light.

    Ask yourself this.

    Why would I, or anybody else, seek to villify another shooter?. Envy? I don't think so. For the record, and the last time, I had doubts about the old fantasist when he started rambling.
    I cut in when he started making claims that ultimately could damage our sport. Specifically that he is capable of punching a 1" target at 150 yards. Not grouping, not having a few sighters, but straight off the bat.
    His second was the claim about never missing a rabbit over 100 yards. Totally risible and an encouragement to the gullible (and boy do we have a few) to start dropping pellets into live targets, completely against the work we all do to promote responsible hunting.

    I will comment no more.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    24,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Born Again View Post
    Why indeed, I'm at a loss as to why there has been such vilification of Harry.
    First, there has never been any 'vilification of Harry' from me, not once, never.

    Secondly, the Mods took a decision for what they believed to be valid reasons. You may not agree with that decision but the Mods have a job to do and decision-making is a part of that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    24,739
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD MARK View Post
    ...BUT HOW THE HELL YOU LADS CAN EVEN SEE A ONE AND A HALF INCH TARGET AT 150 YARDS SUPRISES ME...
    A 35X SCOPE HELPS, MATE.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    East Kilbride - Scotland
    Posts
    561
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD MARK View Post
    TO BE HONEST GENTS ALL THIS LONG RANGE SHOOTING IS WELL OVER MY HEAD BUT HOW THE HELL YOU LADS CAN EVEN SEE A ONE AND A HALF INCH TARGET AT 150 YARDS SUPRISES ME.I THINK YOUR DREAMING MYSELF
    I was using a 1 inch dot at about 94 yds and could see it no probs with 10x mag. Could even see the pellet holes as well.

  11. #11
    Born Again Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD MARK View Post
    TO BE HONEST GENTS ALL THIS LONG RANGE SHOOTING IS WELL OVER MY HEAD BUT HOW THE HELL YOU LADS CAN EVEN SEE A ONE AND A HALF INCH TARGET AT 150 YARDS SUPRISES ME.I THINK YOUR DREAMING MYSELF
    TIME TO GET RID OF THAT 4x40 MARK

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •