Zeiss Diavari V 6-24x72* illuminated rifle scope

[ormondprop]

thanks guys, i reckon the 56mm should do everything i need and more, so i say thats what i'll go for, the 72mm was tempting me even though i knew it was going to be a lot of hassle to mount and look through on the rifle due to the extra height, so the 56mm will be mine soon enough, what reticles do ye guys have, i'm thinking of the 40 ir, or 60 ir i heard the nf scopes are a big let down alrite when there is little light,

[scottyoungsheep]

I would say if you're willing to spend that much money on a scope, an extra x quid for mounts shouldn't be of any concern to you.

[Ballie]

thanks guys, i reckon the 56mm should do everything i need and more, so i say thats what i'll go for, the 72mm was tempting me even though i knew it was going to be a lot of hassle to mount and look through on the rifle due to the extra height, so the 56mm will be mine soon enough, what reticles do ye guys have, i'm thinking of the 40 ir, or 60 ir i heard the nf scopes are a big let down alrite when there is little light,

I've got the 60 which I think is perfect. a couple of other guys on here have the same and also think its good

[Marky610]

I've got the 60 which I think is perfect. a couple of other guys on here have the same and also think its good

Me included

Ballie I'm glad your happy with the scope (how could you not have been ) I was worried about convincing someone to spend so much money on a scope without seeing one, even though I did

If someone doesn't want any extra aim points on a scope then I think the 60 ret is perfect, I've used mine at dawn, dusk, under the lamp and with a nv add-on, all perfect

Oh and during the day

[sir-slots-alot]

what reticles do ye guys have, i'm thinking of the 40 ir, or 60 ir

I have 43 ret on mine - ( the fine mildot ) well worth a look at - all of them are good , I especially like 60 ret - I would have a look through them and pick which one suit you and your shooting.

Alan

[Ballie]

ormondprop,

Ret choice is very personal if you like to use hold over points then the mil dot (43) will suit you well however, if you use the dial in method or use a very flat shooting rifle then a simple (60) dot is sufficient.

The choice is yours

[ormondprop]

i have a mildot scope already and never use the mildots so i think i'd prefer to go for a normal cross such as the 40 or 60, i'll have to look through them to decide, is the 40 very thick?

[Ballie]

i have a mildot scope already and never use the mildots so i think i'd prefer to go for a normal cross such as the 40 or 60, i'll have to look through them to decide, is the 40 very thick?

I think the 60 is much better have a look here http://www.zeiss.de/C12567A80033F8E4...256A7300451C05

[C3PO_1]

How much are these scopes?

[Marky610]

How much are these scopes?

Uttings are quoting a mere £1569 for one now, I paid about £1300 a few months ago