Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 54

Thread: Defra Licence:

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire. UK
    Posts
    2,419
    Quote Originally Posted by johnny k View Post
    Thought the JAY was now off the licence.........any comments
    Hello Johnny,

    Not as far as I'm aware. Jays are still a legal quarry species but many same as myself tend not to shoot them. They are a member of the Corvid family rooks, crows, jackdaws, magpies etc probably why they're included but I'm not sure. If you look under WML Gen- L05 on the Natural England website it says the following :-

    1. The purposes for which this licence is granted are preventing the spread of disease and preventing
    serious damage to livestock, foodstuffs for livestock, crops, vegetables, fruit, growing timber, fisheries
    or inland waters.

    2. Subject to the terms and conditions below, and for the purposes set out in paragraph (1) above, this
    licence permits:

    (i) any authorised person to kill or take any of the wild birds listed in this subparagraph, to take,
    damage or destroy their nests or to take or destroy their eggs:

    Greater Canada Goose Branta canadensis
    Crow Corvus corone
    Dove, Collared Streptopelia decaocto
    Gull, Great Black-backed Larus marinus
    Gull, Lesser Black-backed Larus fuscus
    Gull, Herring Larus argentatus
    Jackdaw Corvus monedula
    Jay Garrulus glandarius
    Magpie Pica pica
    Pigeon, Feral Columba livia
    Rook Corvus frugilegus
    Woodpigeon Columba palumbus

    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Last edited by Greylag; 27-04-2008 at 01:49 PM. Reason: extra added
    Dave (www.kwacs.org.uk) "Wildfowlers do it in the mud"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Higham
    Posts
    8,323
    Which one of them damages growing timber

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire. UK
    Posts
    2,419
    Quote Originally Posted by JRDS View Post
    Which one of them damages growing timber
    Hello JRDS,

    I think it's more to do with damaging the fruit trees by eating the buds rather than physically damaging the structure. I suppose them eating the buds would make the tree less prolific in it's growth cycle but as I'm no botanist I can't say.

    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Dave (www.kwacs.org.uk) "Wildfowlers do it in the mud"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    doncaster, south yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    48
    Never been asked for a license, i have worked on airports, landfill sites, killed many birds with my falcons and hawks. mainly Gull's crows, pigeon,
    craggrat

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    east grinstead
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by craggrat View Post
    Never been asked for a license, i have worked on airports, landfill sites, killed many birds with my falcons and hawks. mainly Gull's crows, pigeon,
    craggrat

    can you kill sea gulls?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire
    Posts
    463
    Does protection of crops include protection of personal crops?
    My guns; BSA R-10 (.22), BSA XL Tactical (.177), BSA Lightning (.177), Gamo CF-30 (.22), Gamo Cadet (.177), Cometa 100 (.177), Gamo P-800 Pistol (.177)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    W-s-M, Somerset
    Posts
    2,565
    There are four different licences under which we might operate... the quarry species are not necessarily the same on each one.

    Doug

    :: Licence to kill or take certain birds to prevent serious damage or disease WML Gen-L05 PDF
    :: Licence to kill or take certain birds to preserve air safety WML Gen-L06 PDF
    :: Licence to kill or take certain birds to preserve public health or public safety WML Gen-L07 PDF
    :: Licence to kill or take certain birds to conserve wild birds WML Gen-L08 PDF
    ... 'My Good Deals' - see >here<, post #538
    BASC
    >visit their website< & find out how to join

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brentwood, Essex
    Posts
    434

    i dont understand?

    is this like a licence you have to apply for or a code to abide by when hunting?

    is it saying that any semiauto used for hunting must have a mag capacity of no more than two rounds? whats all that about?

    forgiv my ignorance and any help would be greatly recieved..

    lewis

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bridgend
    Posts
    1,656

    Starlings are

    Still on the welsh office list.
    S410SL Xtra Fac - Cz Varmit .17 hmr 20" with sak
    Escort 3" semi auto camo bang stick.Baikal s/s 12 g.
    .22lr Cz 452 lux

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Great Yarmouth Norfolk
    Posts
    1,691
    Seems they have moved the licences again. The list of General Licences can now be found here.

    Alan

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    dunstable
    Posts
    21

    OMG it runs out!!!!!

    Thanks for this invaluable link, first I did not realise it ran out I did not realise the authority on this license had changed + would have had difficulty finding it as there is no link on defras website,

    Thanks again,

    SNIPER1
    The best shot is a safe shot
    .22 Webley Tempest .22 Gamo Magnum, .177SMK underlever, .177 Crossman 1077, .177 Desert Eagle, .177 Gamo PT80, .22 King Ratcatcher

  12. #12
    Geoffc Guest
    Just out of interest, I'm a member of Scottish Association of Country Sports.

    As I take Woodpigeon for the pot then I thought I would get legal clarification.
    I do kill them to prevent crop damage but, as we are a hunter-gatherer species then I did ask, what is the legal position for 'hunting' Pigeons.
    In the SACS magazine they had printed an article about a chap being prosecuted by the RSPCA for allowing his son to shoot a pigeon in his own garden. SACS said this was not illegal so, again I wanted clarification.
    I have cut and pasted his reply here.

    Hi Geoff - thanks for the email.
    I’m a bit pushed for time, so I will be brief - please excuse!
    The public general licenses allow authorised persons to kill or take the species listed only for the reasons specified in the licenses - this is carefully worded to comply with EU law. The two we use most commonly as shooters are for the protection of crops and the protection of ground nesting birds.
    It has been accepted that these species can be killed for these purposes at any time or in any place - it is not restricted to the protection of a specific bird nest or a specific field or crop - in other words it is fine in the legal sense to kill them at any time in any place, on the basis that they would be damaging crops or nests at some point in their lives.
    The point is that although these are the only legal reasons for killing them, there is no restriction on what you do with them once you have killed them, so it’s perfectly ok to take them home and eat them (although I wouldn’t recommend it with crows!) or dispose of them in any way you see fit, including selling them to a game dealer if you have enough to make that worthwhile.
    In practice, it is entirely academic until some member of the public or RSPB clown tries it on as in the case you mention, and to be safe, if anyone asks you why you shot a bird, you simply say for the protection of……. and that’s the end of it.

    That'll do for me

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dorchester
    Posts
    292
    Thanks Geoff for the good post.

    .....in other words it is fine in the legal sense to kill them at any time in any place, on the basis that they would be damaging crops or nests at some point in their lives........

    So you CAN shoot woodpigeon for the pot.

    It would appear then that when questioned by a person of authority you answer ' I did this for the pot' = court appearance. 'I did this for the protection of crops' = no case to answer.

    Sometimes we don't always say the right things at the right time and end up in the proverbial when no malice was intended.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    yeovil
    Posts
    366
    i see they have removed greater black back gull and herring gull but added parakeets but the lesser black back is still on the list

    perhaps these gulls are becoming rare like starlings, well in front of the countryside alliance HQ office window anyway
    chippy

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Putney, SW London
    Posts
    75

    Rats, Squirrels and Rabbits

    I've been downloading and reading the general licenses and they all seem to be for birds. Nowhere does it mention and mammals such as Rats, Rabbits or Squirrels.

    Is there another General License covering these? Does anyone have a link?

    Cheers,
    Shaun
    Weihrauch HW97k - V-Glided, competition trigger

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •