Leupold Mark 4 10x40

[kram245]

Thanks for the review Ryan,excellent. i had a look through your mk4 at the last southern hunters, very nice it was too. I presumed it had been re-px'd, as it seemed to be in-focus at every target i looked at in my limited time looking through it. The TMR ret is superb is'nt it. I had Leupold put one in my 3.5-10x40, on my deer rifle. Seems like there might be a few of these mk4's on the HFT circuit this year.

[Charlts]

Thanks for the review Ryan,excellent. i had a look through your mk4 at the last southern hunters, very nice it was too. I presumed it had been re-px'd, as it seemed to be in-focus at every target i looked at in my limited time looking through it. The TMR ret is superb is'nt it. I had Leupold put one in my 3.5-10x40, on my deer rifle. Seems like there might be a few of these mk4's on the HFT circuit this year.

That was as it came mate. I really fancy a TMR 3.5-10x40 TMR for my springer but the TMR's aren't very popular in the US apparently and they are currently like rocking horse poo!

Ryan

[kram245]

That was as it came mate. I really fancy a TMR 3.5-10x40 TMR for my springer but the TMR's aren't very popular in the US apparently and they are currently like rocking horse poo!

Ryan

Did'nt know the take up on the TMR ret. Its a design, so maybe more popular over here. To be honest, on my Remington 700, its not any more useful than a mildot for deer. The ammo i use, federal v-shock, drops under 3" at 200 metres, from a 100m zero. , and most of my deer shots will be 150m or under.However, i do an occasional bit of longer range target shooting, and its very good for that. It would be a great ret on an airgun IMO, due to multi aimpoints, along with Leupold quality, as you've highlighted Ryan.


mark