View Poll Results: Proposed change to the UBC Competition

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • Leave it as it is.

    11 64.71%
  • Change to the proposed criteria

    6 35.29%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Proposed change of targets for the UBC Competitions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Newquay, Cornwall
    Posts
    134
    I was going to wait until I got home and then draft a reply talking about 6oClock point of aim and holding sight picture but I think that John's post above pretty much covers it.

    I too would be happy to participate in a different competition using targets such as those suggested, it would even be an excuse to use a different pistol zeroed to point of aim at six yards.

    Cheers

    Pete
    Plot ?... What Plot ?... I thought you had it !!
    Good Deals with Good Folks

  2. #2
    Charlts is offline I'm not the Messiah, I'm King of the Creedbros!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Leicester, Wigston, 171.27 miles North of Calais!
    Posts
    13,182

    Pistol Comp

    Any chance of allowing scopes Pad? I don't mean rifle scopes with short eye relief, so you can shoot a pistol like a rifle, but handgun scopes where you have to hold it at arms length to see through the scope?

    I really fancy entering but don't want to have to whip my scope off to re-zero every month and my eyes aren't good enough to focus open sights and a target until I get them lasered.

    Ryan
    The toxicity of lead varies, depending upon the weight of its doseage and its velocity!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,543
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlts View Post
    Any chance of allowing scopes Pad? I don't mean rifle scopes with short eye relief, so you can shoot a pistol like a rifle, but handgun scopes where you have to hold it at arms length to see through the scope?

    I really fancy entering but don't want to have to whip my scope off to re-zero every month and my eyes aren't good enough to focus open sights and a target until I get them lasered.

    Ryan

    Hi Ryan.

    With the current comp it's only open sights, at first it was only one category until someone mentioned about different accuracies with different guns. So to keep the peace I split the categories up . I think allowing scopes would again open up a can of worms

    However, if & if the consensus is to keep the comp as it is. I could do what Peter agrees's & do a side shoot. Now the side shoot could be an open category with whatever sights?

    I think I should be a Diplomat

    Regards
    Paddy.
    BE-HAPPY-OK

  4. #4
    Charlts is offline I'm not the Messiah, I'm King of the Creedbros!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Leicester, Wigston, 171.27 miles North of Calais!
    Posts
    13,182

    Diplomat

    Quote Originally Posted by Pad. E View Post
    Hi Ryan.

    With the current comp it's only open sights, at first it was only one category until someone mentioned about different accuracies with different guns. So to keep the peace I split the categories up . I think allowing scopes would again open up a can of worms

    However, if & if the consensus is to keep the comp as it is. I could do what Peter agrees's & do a side shoot. Now the side shoot could be an open category with whatever sights?

    I think I should be a Diplomat

    Regards
    Paddy.
    Good enough for me mate, I'll await the side shoot results.

    Ryan
    The toxicity of lead varies, depending upon the weight of its doseage and its velocity!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Diss, S. Norfolk
    Posts
    2,867
    Hi Paddy...like John my pistols are sighted "below the black" (still shoot rubbish though ) that's why I prefer the original comp.
    I do like the idea of the sideshoot though with various targets and it could be open to all pistols with any sighting arrangement providing it's arms length of course...I can then use my Falcon FN6 & red dot combo
    More work for you though m8 so can understand you might not want another comp.
    Regards....Eric.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brough E.Yorks
    Posts
    1,611

    Dip-lomaniac ;-)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pad. E View Post
    Hi Ryan.

    With the current comp it's only open sights, at first it was only one category until someone mentioned about different accuracies with different guns. So to keep the peace I split the categories up . I think allowing scopes would again open up a can of worms

    However, if & if the consensus is to keep the comp as it is. I could do what Peter agrees's & do a side shoot. Now the side shoot could be an open category with whatever sights?

    I think I should be a Diplomat

    Regards
    Paddy.
    I like the idea of that, 2 comps and the second with choice of sights

    Tony.
    UBC Secretary & Web-Manager
    THL Marksman of the Year 2010
    (Airgun Section)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    554

    Cookies for Christmas

    Pad.E
    New target with ten cherries installed at link you've given. Never thought of it as a competition target.

    Cookie
    The original is now yours to keep. Make certain that you have the .PDF as I will shortly delete it from my files and go on to the new one.
    Got this from Dragonsinger if you want a Christmas target. http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...massTarget.jpg You could also use this http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k.../OffCentre.jpg
    or I could ask him to do a load of balls. These are tough targets since he only puts a 6.5mm bull on them

    Let me know the result
    Jim
    Globus magnus volvere
    trepidex mea non est!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,543
    Quote Originally Posted by Target Bunny View Post
    Pad.E
    New target with ten cherries installed at link you've given. Never thought of it as a competition target.

    Let me know the result
    Jim
    Excellent. Thanks Jim.

    That will make the comp scoring much easier.

    I like these targets as they put abit of 'fun' into the equation

    Not decided whether it will be running in the main comp, or do a side shoot (entails slightly more admin, but what the hell ).

    Regards
    Paddy.
    BE-HAPPY-OK

  9. #9
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,335
    Look at them crazy psychedelic ball things! - I am not shooting at anything that resembles a bad acid trip

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sunny Manchester
    Posts
    1,380

    Lightbulb

    I'm up for leaving it as is but having another category for pistols with sights: that would give me the opportunity to use the recently neglected Nighthawk. Shame about the dreadful trigger, but I'm used to it now.

    Not bothered whether it's a side shoot or a fifth category for sighted pistols only. Also not bothered about what targets we use, although the Target Bunny additions would certainly be a novelty and should keep the comp from going stale.

    Here's another idea prompted by Snooper601's excellent advice on page 1 - how about a sticky for "Pistol Shooting Tips" that we could all add to and hopefully learn and improve from?

    Edit: Whoops forgot to say please enter me with Walther Nighthawk / Walther Top Point red dot cheers.
    Last edited by MikeB; 10-07-2008 at 10:01 AM.

  11. #11
    Charlts is offline I'm not the Messiah, I'm King of the Creedbros!
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Leicester, Wigston, 171.27 miles North of Calais!
    Posts
    13,182

    Sideshoot

    Add me please Pad.E Steyr LP50 with a Thompson Centre Arms scope.

    Cheers

    Ryan
    The toxicity of lead varies, depending upon the weight of its doseage and its velocity!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,543
    The 'Fairest one of all' cheers Jim & 'Snow White' indeed

    Looks like the side shoot is good to go then.

    I'll start doing the list soon enough.

    Regards
    Snow White I mean Paddy
    BE-HAPPY-OK

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Newquay, Cornwall
    Posts
    134
    ;
    Quote Originally Posted by Pad. E View Post
    Hi Ryan.

    With the current comp it's only open sights, at first it was only one category until someone mentioned about different accuracies with different guns. So to keep the peace I split the categories up . I think allowing scopes would again open up a can of worms

    However, if & if the consensus is to keep the comp as it is. I could do what Peter agrees's & do a side shoot. Now the side shoot could be an open category with whatever sights?

    I think I should be a Diplomat

    Regards
    Paddy.
    Hehe

    Here's a suggestion Mister Diplomat sir,
    a side shoot with two simple categories, Standard Category for any pistol using Iron (open) Sights and Open Category allowing any sighting system, i.e Mag Scope, Red Dot, Laser. So long as the pistol is shot from the hand unsupported at arms length and the pellet is not fitted with any homing or laser or wire guidance system .

    You just know that John will enter both categories. Oh BTW so will I.

    It might even be worth running a small pilot next month to see how it goes. If you can fit it in, of course.

    Pete
    Last edited by Pete R; 07-07-2008 at 03:53 PM.
    Plot ?... What Plot ?... I thought you had it !!
    Good Deals with Good Folks

  14. #14
    Jim McArthur is offline Frock coat wearing, riverboat dwelling, southern gent
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Posts
    5,887
    I think we should stick with open sights for the 4 existing categories, but also have a side shoot / 5th category: any type of pistol with any type of optical sight.

    Jim

    Quote Originally Posted by Pad. E View Post
    Hi Ryan.

    With the current comp it's only open sights, at first it was only one category until someone mentioned about different accuracies with different guns. So to keep the peace I split the categories up . I think allowing scopes would again open up a can of worms

    However, if & if the consensus is to keep the comp as it is. I could do what Peter agrees's & do a side shoot. Now the side shoot could be an open category with whatever sights?

    I think I should be a Diplomat

    Regards
    Paddy.
    UBC's Police Pistol Manager
    "Nasty, noisy things, revolvers, Count. Better stick to air-guns." Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of the Mazarin Stone

  15. #15
    Jim McArthur is offline Frock coat wearing, riverboat dwelling, southern gent
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Posts
    5,887
    I think we should use different targets, at least some of the time.

    Let's face it, ours is not a traditional bullseye comp anyway - why do we use two-hand hold, some of the time? We should mix it up with different types of targets: bullseye, hunting, silhouette, oddball stuff: become real all-around pistoleers.

    Ji m
    UBC's Police Pistol Manager
    "Nasty, noisy things, revolvers, Count. Better stick to air-guns." Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of the Mazarin Stone

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •