Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Burris Timberline 4.5-14x w/ Ballistic Plex reticle

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    portslade near brighton
    Posts
    10,274
    Quote Originally Posted by pieinthesky View Post
    Thanks Andy.

    Have just received an e mail back from dnrsports saying they will ship to UK.

    Didnt say how much though!
    I would like to know how much as well?
    If atall possible.
    mike.
    SIHFT Winners 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - AND 2014....2015..2016...oh look back at green...running out of colours! Ha!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    63
    I have e mailed orctechnologies for a price including shipping. Their scope price is a bit better. Will let you know when I receive a reply.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    63
    I am seriously considering one of these scopes, I have never had an AO scope before, can anyone tell me:

    Is it possible to range find with a 4 - 14 x 32 scope?

    Is the depth of field the same on an AO scope as on a non AO scope, assuming they are both set to the same range. So if I set this scope to 30m and just leave it there will it be the same as a non AO scope set at 30m?

    Does the longer eye relief increase, decrease or have no effect on the chance of parallax error. It will not always be possible to focus the scope correctly?

    Will it be as bright as a cheap Hawk 40mm scope and suitable for lamping?

    So many questions I know, thanks for any replies.

  4. #4
    Sam Vimes is offline Vanquished a Weihrauch evangelist with a gasram
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Richmond, North Yorkshire.
    Posts
    9,529
    Quote Originally Posted by pieinthesky View Post
    Is it possible to range find with a 4 - 14 x 32 scope?
    Depends on how you define rangefinding. If you mean rangefinding by PX then it will be possible but it'll be quite unreliable. This scope has nowhere near high enough mag or large enough objective to rangefind by PX reliably and at range. To do so would necessitate minimum magnification of around 30x and a front end of 40mm or more.

    Quote Originally Posted by pieinthesky View Post
    Is the depth of field the same on an AO scope as on a non AO scope, assuming they are both set to the same range. So if I set this scope to 30m and just leave it there will it be the same as a non AO scope set at 30m?.
    AO should have little impact on the DOF of a scope. That's a product of the magnification and objective size. In this case, for a given level of mag, the 32mm objective should ensure a greater DOF than a scope with a larger front end.

    Quote Originally Posted by pieinthesky View Post
    Does the longer eye relief increase, decrease or have no effect on the chance of parallax error. It will not always be possible to focus the scope correctly?.
    This depends entirely on who you talk to. However, picking a sensible PX distance and an appropriate mag setting should mean that it won't need the px reset for every shot. In fact this is precisely the scenario that HFT shooters find themselves in.

    Quote Originally Posted by pieinthesky View Post
    Will it be as bright as a cheap Hawk 40mm scope and suitable for lamping?.
    Decent optics and the coatings of those optics play a large part in the light transmission (brightness) of a scope. In the case of the small objective Burris the greater quality of lens may well cancel out the extra 8mm of objective that the Hawke has (for a given mag setting).
    Fabricatum diem, pvnc!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    63
    Wow that was quick. Thanks Sam, I was probably expecting a bit much to be able to use it for range finding.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Bolton,Lancs
    Posts
    11,147
    Just received one of these scopes.

    I currently use a little Leup 3 - 9 x 33 EFR and find it excellent for my failing eyesight . These are available at around £350.

    The Timberline is a very similar spec scope and well worth a try. Cost from the States is around $205 plus post. This worked out at around £165. There was a further £40 to pay in taxes so a total of £205 for what is an excellent scope.
    The ret is the "Ballistic Plex" which has a couple of useful aimpoints on it.

    The scope was purchased from http://www.dnrsports.com/ who were excellent. Mark Komoroski at Dnr was really helpful.

    Just one point. The scope was sent via USPS and you can track it all the way.
    The last note on the tracking was that an attempted delivery was made at 3.41 am . Tracking then stops as it's handed over to the U.K. Postal Service.
    Parcel Force then wrote for their money

    After staying in all day I went shooting, only to return and find £200 of scope on my doorstep

    If your thinking of a nice versatile and practical scope the Timberline is worth consideration. As is Dnr for the purchase.

    ATB
    Ray.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Sleaford, Lincs
    Posts
    10,716
    Quote Originally Posted by Raygun View Post
    Just received one of these scopes.

    I currently use a little Leup 3 - 9 x 33 EFR and find it excellent for my failing eyesight . These are available at around £350.

    The Timberline is a very similar spec scope and well worth a try. Cost from the States is around $205 plus post. This worked out at around £165. There was a further £40 to pay in taxes so a total of £205 for what is an excellent scope.
    The ret is the "Ballistic Plex" which has a couple of useful aimpoints on it.

    The scope was purchased from http://www.dnrsports.com/ who were excellent. Mark Komoroski at Dnr was really helpful.

    Just one point. The scope was sent via USPS and you can track it all the way.
    The last note on the tracking was that an attempted delivery was made at 3.41 am . Tracking then stops as it's handed over to the U.K. Postal Service.
    Parcel Force then wrote for their money

    After staying in all day I went shooting, only to return and find £200 of scope on my doorstep

    If your thinking of a nice versatile and practical scope the Timberline is worth consideration. As is Dnr for the purchase.

    ATB
    Ray.


    I had one of these last year. Great scopes. I might buy another.

    Andy

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    5,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Raygun View Post
    Just received one of these scopes.

    I currently use a little Leup 3 - 9 x 33 EFR and find it excellent for my failing eyesight . These are available at around £350.

    The Timberline is a very similar spec scope and well worth a try. Cost from the States is around $205 plus post. This worked out at around £165. There was a further £40 to pay in taxes so a total of £205 for what is an excellent scope.
    The ret is the "Ballistic Plex" which has a couple of useful aimpoints on it.

    The scope was purchased from http://www.dnrsports.com/ who were excellent. Mark Komoroski at Dnr was really helpful.

    Just one point. The scope was sent via USPS and you can track it all the way.
    The last note on the tracking was that an attempted delivery was made at 3.41 am . Tracking then stops as it's handed over to the U.K. Postal Service.
    Parcel Force then wrote for their money


    After staying in all day I went shooting, only to return and find £200 of scope on my doorstep

    If your thinking of a nice versatile and practical scope the Timberline is worth consideration. As is Dnr for the purchase.

    ATB
    Ray.
    I just received my Timberline today and exactly the same thing happened. I coughed up and ParcelFarce delivered.

    On first view, it is a lovely compact little scope, optics seem clear as the MTC it is replacing. I can't say yet if they are better. It seems very well made and the controls are firm and positive.

    It is now on my HW80 on Sportsmatch low. I did need a piece of 35mm film to shim at the back.

    The Ballistic Plex ret seems OK for .22 trajectory. I will test it further on Saturday, but tweaking the eyepiece focus, the PX and the zoom, I can at last see the close KZs at 10 yards and it is clear enough out to 45 yards. Fingers crossed when I do my range cards all will be OK


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •