Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Ruger Old Army shooting low?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tenterden
    Posts
    596
    My Old Army with adjustable sights shot high irrsepective of load or bullet type. I made a new taller foresight element for it to bring it down to POA.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bournemouth
    Posts
    65

    Smile Update

    Hi

    Thanks for all comments and info.

    Today I tried 30gr of 777 and it shot way low!

    I then tried 20g of 777 and I hit target board so I guess I need to work on that load and start practising

    Tim

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    shepshed
    Posts
    1,125
    bend the barrel in a hydraulic press

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    EXMOUTH
    Posts
    152
    I second all that's been said before. Find your ideal load first.
    One of the bizarre things about BP revolvers is that they need a certain amount of power to acheive accuracy. Too little is as bad as too much. This was proved to me when I started shooting my Roger OA at 50 metres. My normal load was 23 grains of black powder and I thought I would up it to 30 to cope with the extra range. Absolutely hopeless. Of course what I should have done is to stay with the normal load and wind up the sights 3 clicks which is what I did do eventually. Obvious when you think about it. My friend had a Pietta revolver that just wouldn't group. I found he was only using 15 grains. When he upped it to 20 things started to improve dramatically. This seems different from the old Police Pistol days when we used to use 3.5 grains of Bullseye at 25 metres and 1.9 at 10. (In a .38 special of course)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    EXMOUTH
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Auto culto View Post
    bend the barrel in a hydraulic press
    Have you ever done this?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Shepperton
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by Napoleon IV View Post
    Have you ever done this?
    Think it was a JOKE

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    EXMOUTH
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Wobbly 2 View Post
    Think it was a JOKE
    It might not be!! I was just looking through the GUN DIGEST for 2000 and there was an author who suggested bending the barrel of a Colt SAA to correct the aim. Until then I'd never heard of this procedure. Very hit and miss I should have thought unless it was bent to start with.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by steve medlock View Post
    My Old Army with adjustable sights shot high irrsepective of load or bullet type. I made a new taller foresight element for it to bring it down to POA.
    Mine, too. I`ve had it since 1986, and have only ever shot Pyrodex in it with the one charge that suits it well - 24gr of Pyrodex P and a cast RB. I don`t use a wad, a. because I`m a tight-fisted old fart, and refuse to pay the prices they cost over here, and I often shoot around a hundred shots at a session, and b. I have used E45 as a chamber sealer, an emulsion hand preparation sold in large tubs [Boots, the chemist], since I began BP shooting back in the mid-1970`s in Germany.

    Last sunday, my first five shots at 20 yds went into just over an inch and half.

    Shooting the same charge with the conical results in the bullet heading up about 12 inches higher, but still very accurately. I`ve never bothered to replace the foresight, in fact, after writing a few times to Viking Arms to get ahold of one, I gave up after two years.

    One of our club members has been experimenting with paper cartridges made using Rizla `reds` and a former. Having tried them out, I can say that they work VERY well, but were made using BP, a propellant I am not allowed to keep in my house for insurance reasons.

    tac

    PS - Please note that all weights and measures in this post are Imperial. If any or all of you are offended by this improper use of dimensional data in a metricised country, please write to your MP. Meanwhile, please convert to metric by using 1 inch = 25.4 millimeters. To save looking it up, there are thirty-six of these `inches` in one `yard`. Grains to grammes is something I`ll let you figure out yourselves.
    Last edited by tacfoley; 30-11-2008 at 11:33 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •