Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: The Original 45 is better than the Omega

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gareth W-B's Avatar
    Gareth W-B is offline Retired Mod & Airgun Anorak Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near(ish) Chelmsford
    Posts
    26,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackel View Post

    The falcon is my lamping kit
    ... are you allowed to stay up that late then ???
    _______________________________________________

    Done my bit for the BBS: http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....-being-a-mod-… now I’m a game-keeper turned poacher.

  2. #2
    Sam Vimes is offline Vanquished a Weihrauch evangelist with a gasram
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Richmond, North Yorkshire.
    Posts
    9,529
    As Gareth is worried that the PS doesn't fit and we seem to be going down the best break barrel rifle avenue, then I'll throw the Pro-Elite or even HW80 into the mix. I consider both to be too much gun at sub 12 ft.lb but both are better than any of the rifles mentioned so far, mainly due to a superior trigger. However, they probably aren't old enough for most in this section. To get out of the overgunned feeling of the PE and 80 then the HW98 needs to be considered.
    As far as the original question of 45 Vs Omega, who really cares? Neither are as good as the FWB or the HW35.
    Fabricatum diem, pvnc!

  3. #3
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Vimes View Post
    As far as the original question of 45 Vs Omega, who really cares? Neither are as good as the FWB or the HW35.
    Both designs 20 years older than the 45 and 30-plus years older than the Omega! DUH! What where they thinking of?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Blackburn, Lancs. (under a bridge)
    Posts
    22,944
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Vimes View Post
    As far as the original question of 45 Vs Omega, who really cares? Neither are as good as the FWB or the HW35.
    Says it all really.

    ATB
    Ian
    Founder & ex secretary of Rivington Riflemen.
    www.rivington-riflemen.uk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    mansfield
    Posts
    224

    my little bit

    Just by saying the hw or sport are better then a 45 does not work first thing the workmanship of 45 is far superior, that plank of wood was designed to take the recoil and put it into the stock you don’t see many with broken stocks big and chunky it fits in to the shoulder nicely. The forearm of the stock is nice and deep, a big solid pistol grip not designed for women or children that’s why its doesn’t split. All the metal parts run easily no nasty noises or scraping or wear, first-class blueing because of the quality of the metal. The barrel even by today’s standards its top notch, crisp riffling and a first-class choke, whatever you do don’t shorten the barrel it will be a sin.

    As for the Omega it was made to look German but fell well short, looks pretty in a rack but not a work horse.

    White Ferret

  6. #6
    Sam Vimes is offline Vanquished a Weihrauch evangelist with a gasram
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Richmond, North Yorkshire.
    Posts
    9,529
    I've always preferred accuracy over out and out workmanship. The HW35 may look like a railway sleeper but they certainly shoot well. The 45 might well be made better but its biggest let down is a relatively poor trigger. It doesn't even come close to the Rekord. If workmanship really was the be all and end all then I suspect that Webley would never have gone bust and would be still producing MKIIIs.
    Fabricatum diem, pvnc!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •