Reply With QuoteI had a similar Crosman model 1, it was fantastic fun until the pump seal worn, it took about twenty pumps to get near full power
John
Registered User
Just aquired a Crosman 2200 Magnum.22
I don`t know nothing about them,but what i do know
that it`s a delight to shoot and quite different.
"What ye all think ye haaaaar"?
cheers
Hooker.
The Chrono Slayer
I had a similar Crosman model 1, it was fantastic fun until the pump seal worn, it took about twenty pumps to get near full power
John
for my gunz guitarz and bonzai, see here
www.flickr.com/photos/8163995@N07/
Registered User
I sold an absolute minter on here in Feb - power wise it was fine, but for prolonged plinking spells, you started to "feel the burn"
Supposed it kept me fit (well sort of) !
Registered User
Thanks for thatOriginally Posted by johnbaz
I had a similar Crosman model 1, it was fantastic fun until the pump seal worn, it took about twenty pumps to get near full power
John
Guest
Excellent-hope you anjoy it-I sold mine and regretted it ever since!
may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
Just read the 1980 test of the 2200! They were quiet impressed.
I am impressed that one of them is still going, quite cheaply made but nice to use.
I had the .177 version, the Crosman 766 and wore it out, it's good exercise but check that the rather thin barrel doesn't come loose, there is a grubscrew which holds it tight to the receiver. The barrel shroud will stay firm, but the inner rifled bit can get a little wobbly.
Posting Permissions
