Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: My new/old Baikal MP654k...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Battle, East Sussex
    Posts
    2,599

    MAK

    http://www.co2airguns.net/Collection...arov/index.htm
    http://www.co2airguns.net/Collection...arov/index.htm

    It was because of these two reveiws on CO2 collection. I agree that construction wise the Baikal MAK is better. But for fun the Umarex pips it?
    Last edited by coburn; 13-07-2011 at 06:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    64
    The Co2 Replica site is a very good resource, pretty comprehensive reviews on all Co2 pistols (that guy just loves his guns).

    The Umarex pips the Baikal on FPS, and trigger pull, my Baikal is VERY heavy on the DA. Shoots well tho, lead bbs FTW

    The realism of the Baikal is better due it being an (almost) direct conversion of the firearm. Slide racks with the force of a real mainspring, it fieldstrips and magazine use is just like the genuine article. This increases the fun factor for me, as I secretly like to pretend that I'm James Bond

    I know that bond is famous for the PPK (a lower powered western equivalent of the Mak) and I also know (normally) that I am NOT James Bond.

    @Johnbaz
    Glad you got a pre 2009 version (mine is 1999) thought you said in an earlier post it was only 5 years old? Is the magazine very picky about BBS? I can get maybe one out of eight Gamo lead BBS to cooperate. I maybe need a new mag from RusMilitary, but at £78 a pop, its a bit steep.

    I am the Norfolk Bond. Ooo Arr 7

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Battle, East Sussex
    Posts
    2,599
    Gilgamesh

    Shame youre not from Essex then you could have been "Basildon Bond" sorry old joke.

    Good to see its not just me thats got that Bond thing everytime I've got my MAK out!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hemsworth
    Posts
    2,714
    Nice pistol Ive always wanted one of the original baikal maks but the prices just seem to keep creeping up and up and up. And thats if you can find one for sale.
    hoplophobe

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    sheffield
    Posts
    6,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh View Post
    The Co2 Replica site is a very good resource, pretty comprehensive reviews on all Co2 pistols (that guy just loves his guns).

    The Umarex pips the Baikal on FPS, and trigger pull, my Baikal is VERY heavy on the DA. Shoots well tho, lead bbs FTW

    The realism of the Baikal is better due it being an (almost) direct conversion of the firearm. Slide racks with the force of a real mainspring, it fieldstrips and magazine use is just like the genuine article. This increases the fun factor for me, as I secretly like to pretend that I'm James Bond

    I know that bond is famous for the PPK (a lower powered western equivalent of the Mak) and I also know (normally) that I am NOT James Bond.

    @Johnbaz
    Glad you got a pre 2009 version (mine is 1999) thought you said in an earlier post it was only 5 years old? Is the magazine very picky about BBS? I can get maybe one out of eight Gamo lead BBS to cooperate. I maybe need a new mag from RusMilitary, but at £78 a pop, its a bit steep.

    I am the Norfolk Bond. Ooo Arr 7
    Hi Gilgamesh (Am I chatting to a god??)

    The chap I got it from said it was five years old but I think he must have meant he had owned it for five years and had probably bought it s/h.
    According to the first part of the serial# (T00), it's a 2000 model..

    I still haven't tied the pistol yet, it looks like I only have one CO2 cart left

    Ooof!!- £78 is a bit rich for a magazine


    Cheers, John
    for my gunz guitarz and bonzai, see here
    www.flickr.com/photos/8163995@N07/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Banbury
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by johnbaz View Post
    Ooof!!- £78 is a bit rich for a magazine
    Yes, but bear in mind that 80% of the gun's firing mechanism is contained within the magazine and the price makes a bit more sense. It's not like how it is with regular firearms where the magazine is just a container and spring feed. With one of these it's that plus CO2 holding and piercing, valve and expansion chamber. Much more complicated than a regular magazine.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Whitehaven
    Posts
    287
    A similar magazine for an ASG CZ75 only costs about £25. Doesn't fit the Mak of course, but indicates that the Russian one is perhaps overpriced.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Banbury
    Posts
    29
    True enough. But I guess maybe the mark up is so high on the mak because of the manufacturing and importation processes that go into it. After all, the mak itself is not a cheap gun for what it is.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Whitehaven
    Posts
    287
    When I got my Mak recently, the valve was leaking and required a complete dismantle. While it was in pieces, I took the opportunity to rub the BB compartment down with some fine emery paper and this seems to have made loading gamo rounds much easier. It could probably do with a bit more, but I'm reluctant to dismantle it again just at the moment.


    Ian

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •