+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Rifles without cheek-pieces are more elegant

  1. #1
    Hsing-ee is offline I don't have the slightest association with the lingerie industry
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,810

    Rifles without cheek-pieces are more elegant

    And now we have the ambidextrous cheek pieces with one on both sides like flippin' saddlebags! I think a nice BSA Meteor Standard stock from the early 70s, if it had a higher comb to deal with scopes and perhaps a slightly more exaggerated pistol grip, (more upright I mean) is a far more elegant design than most of the monstrous maladapted meretricious mountings the metalwork must marry with.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    st neots
    Posts
    1,084
    Ah, the subtle lines of a hw35 export stock
    The fine handilng of a Tracker.
    Hows about the modern hw99s? Low comb, very little cheek and the scope still lines up perfectly

    To diverge slightly....ever shot a bsa improved model d or light pattern. The pistol grip is the most comfortable of any rilfe I have ever come across, the trigger finger utterly unstressed and perfectly in place

    I think the modern stock designers could do with a look at some of the old girls for a few lesson

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts