Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: best built c02 pistol?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Brighton.
    Posts
    365
    I think the Makarov is the best multi shot c02 that I have, mine is an an early one and I think the later versions have a cast top slide rather than the milled out ones. The first ones for this reason are probability more solid. I have heard there is a mag that takes pellets for this pistol but not sure if this is so, as it sounds like it will just jam up. Would be interested if anyone has tried one of these.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,393
    Quote Originally Posted by GRAZY View Post
    I think the Makarov is the best multi shot c02 that I have, mine is an an early one and I think the later versions have a cast top slide rather than the milled out ones. The first ones for this reason are probability more solid. I have heard there is a mag that takes pellets for this pistol but not sure if this is so, as it sounds like it will just jam up. Would be interested if anyone has tried one of these.
    That would be the Baikal one your referring to

    Never heard of a pellet version and I cant see how that could work

    The rifled barrel was intended for 4.45 round lead shot as I understand it


  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Brighton.
    Posts
    365
    Yep, me being silly, I must have read lead BB and thought pellet. Thanks for that.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    110

    co2 longevity

    Most of the modern CO2 pistols fail eventually due their complexity and number of parts made with inferior metallurgy.Not to say that they cannot be repaired.The old Crosman 600 is fairly complex but made of better stuff, so if you want a repeater go for this or the Drulov DU10 which is also easy to fix if need be. Single shot buy and old Crosman 150 or 157, 60 year old quality that just keeps going and going, simple and strong.

    Baz

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,393
    And dont forget the Benjamin EB 17/20/22 series. Mainly brass and no plastic that I can think of. 5ft/lb + and accurate if you can manage to fettle the rear sight. Built like brick outhouses. The crude trigger is made slightly more tolerable by fitting a good quality trigger shoe. Only available new in .22 these days - IRO £150. 'Ricks Grips' in the States does some lovely custom wood grips for them too. Well worth a look.

  6. #21
    magicniner is offline The Posh Knocking Shop Artist Formerly Known as Nocturnal Nick
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    5,314
    Smith & Wesson 78 and 79 are two more you'll have to make provision for in your will.
    The same applies to Crosman Model 88 Skanaker, FEG GPM 01 and Alpha Sport, there are a lot of excellent CO2 target pistols out there
    ATB,
    Nick
    Airgun Repairs, Bespoke Airgun Smithing and Precision Engineering Services
    http://www.magic9designltd.com

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Stasiland
    Posts
    26,337
    As already stated, the Makarov is the best made CO2 repeater.

    Built like a T34, solid steel throughout.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    59
    + 1 for the Makarov. Especially the older models, since its made in the same factory as the real gun all the parts used are very high quality and it actually uses many real parts.

    The witness has one of the worst build qualities imo. Cheap pistol but many of the internals are made out of plastic and after about 2000 shots you will notice things getting loose and the gun failing to perform as it once did. Also the metal used is a very cheap alloy that has not been mixed properly (visible if you strip the paint).

    I found the crossman c41 to have pretty good build quality. Also the magnum research desert eagle has a pretty good internal build although the external plastic body feels kinda flimsy.

  9. #24
    Aardys is offline Formerly Old gun/git/ formerly oldcliff/formerly (watch this bleddy space)...
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    sunny Hove actually
    Posts
    2,319
    Quote Originally Posted by junaid8 View Post

    The witness has one of the worst build qualities imo. Cheap pistol but many of the internals are made out of plastic and after about 2000 shots you will notice things getting loose and the gun failing to perform as it once did.
    .
    how many of the intenal parts are plastic ?
    and can you tell me what parts failed to perform ?
    Getting Old

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Sudbury, Suffolk
    Posts
    787
    The plastic arm that strips the bb's from the mag deformed on my first on after about 1000 shots......three days old.

    I don't think anyone is saying that the Witness is not a bag of fun to shoot but next to a Makarov or a Crosman 600 you can see difference in built quality.

    The Witness preforms well for the money and I will be intrested to see how long my second one lasts.
    Zastava Owners Club.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by Aardys View Post
    how many of the intenal parts are plastic ?
    and can you tell me what parts failed to perform ?

    I don't know the name of all the parts but quite a few of them are plastic due to cut costs. As above the bb feeding rod whatever its called is weak and they designed it like it were an airsoft gun. Considering how strong the spring on the magazine is and the heavier projectile you'd expect it to be a bit sturdier (it can easily snap off). Also the barrel gets very wobbly on the ones I've seen which significantly affects the accuracy over time. Seen some where the front sight falls off because of the blowback, gun starts to fire full auto even if the safety is on (in England that's actually illegal), magazine falling out (don't know the name of the part but the thing that keeps the mag locked in is plastic on the ones I've seen) and the one that bothers me the most is the gas sealing. Even with new mags I've seen some fire 40 bb's before the co2 depletes. I believe this is because the gun starts to wear down and release and waste too much gas.

    I'm not knocking the witness, I think its a great gun and alot of fun to shoot for the price. I just think people expect too much from it in terms of reliability. I wish they made a premium version or better version of it though. I'd happily pay twice the price for one.

  12. #27
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is offline Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,502
    The Crosman C-TT feels quite solid. All pretty good metal construction and decent internals. Then again, it's not a blowback model so it won't shake itself to pieces.
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  13. #28
    Aardys is offline Formerly Old gun/git/ formerly oldcliff/formerly (watch this bleddy space)...
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    sunny Hove actually
    Posts
    2,319
    Quote Originally Posted by junaid8 View Post
    I don't know the name of all the parts but quite a few of them are plastic due to cut costs. As above the bb feeding rod whatever its called is weak and they designed it like it were an airsoft gun. Considering how strong the spring on the magazine is and the heavier projectile you'd expect it to be a bit sturdier (it can easily snap off). Also the barrel gets very wobbly on the ones I've seen which significantly affects the accuracy over time. Seen some where the front sight falls off because of the blowback, gun starts to fire full auto even if the safety is on (in England that's actually illegal), magazine falling out (don't know the name of the part but the thing that keeps the mag locked in is plastic on the ones I've seen) and the one that bothers me the most is the gas sealing. Even with new mags I've seen some fire 40 bb's before the co2 depletes. I believe this is because the gun starts to wear down and release and waste too much gas.

    I'm not knocking the witness, I think its a great gun and alot of fun to shoot for the price. I just think people expect too much from it in terms of reliability. I wish they made a premium version or better version of it though. I'd happily pay twice the price for one.
    hmm before i answer , are you getting mixed up with the 6mm bb version of the tanfoglio witness
    or the cybergun tanfoglio witness .177 bb's
    Getting Old

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •