Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Of interest to everyone in the uk

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Chester
    Posts
    3,793

    Of interest to everyone in the uk

    THESE ARE FROM OUR CLUB WEBSITE



    OF INTEREST TO EVERYONE IN THE UK
    (19/7/12) Home Office Figures

    THE CRIMINAL SHOOTER - ENGLAND AND WALES
    Deaths and injuries caused by the illegal use of guns (excluding airguns.)
    1969 - - - - 173
    1988 - - - - 410
    2008/9 - - - 1,764
    2010/11- - - 1,949

    THE LEGAL SHOOTER - ENGLAND AND WALES
    Certificates for the legal use of guns
    1988 - - - - 1,037,400
    2008/9 - - - - 713,674
    2010/12- - - - 705,516

    CRIMES INVOLVING THE USE OF HANDGUNS
    1988 - - - - 1,484
    1998/9 - - - 2,687
    2008/9 - - - 4,275
    2010/11- - - 3,105

    SO..... since 1988, there are now five times as many deaths and injuries from armed crime whilst legal firearm ownership has been reduced by 1/3rd.

    Pistols have been banned from legal use for most practical purposes, (reduced by around 98%) whilst the criminal use of pistols has increased considerably since the "ban."
    NOW tell the victims that banning or licensing saves lives.....

    Figures from Home Office publications from 1969 to 2012, the most recent being-
    "Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11:Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11." Sarah Osborne, Ivy Lau and Andrew Britton, Edited by Kevin Smith. ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0.

    and
    "Firearm Certificates in England and Wales 2010/11" Jabeen Paracha. 22/3/2012, ISBN 978 1 84987 687 2.
    Designer of BASC Logo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    the ghetto of Canterbury
    Posts
    1,739
    but in 1969 there wasn't as many Gangta's limping around was there
    In saying yes to this air rifle you are confirming that you are not a messer and are allowed to go out in public without your carer

  3. #3
    Jackel's Avatar
    Jackel is offline Welding guru and moderator to the stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sunny saltburn n/e coast
    Posts
    40,177
    The impossible I do immediately, miracles take 24 hours..



    NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE,IT JUST COSTS MORE

  4. #4
    geoffd69 is offline Pops head up, looks around, squeeks and runs back underground
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bognor Regis
    Posts
    1,049
    Colorado

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    goole
    Posts
    4

    Laws

    Laws and locks are for honest people. If there's a law then there is always someone somewhere thats going to break it. How many of us drive faster than 70mph on the roads?
    BUT there is a massive difference between driving well within the limits of the car and some, would be hard case packing a shoota. Anyone can win an argument by poking a barrel up someones nose.



    "Standing out in the rain doesnt make you hard it makes you wet!"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    High Wycombe
    Posts
    18,116
    Quote Originally Posted by wild75 View Post
    Laws and locks are for honest people. If there's a law then there is always someone somewhere thats going to break it. How many of us drive faster than 70mph on the roads?
    BUT there is a massive difference between driving well within the limits of the car and some, would be hard case packing a shoota. Anyone can win an argument by poking a barrel up someones nose.



    "Standing out in the rain doesnt make you hard it makes you wet!"
    Cars are capable of more than 70mph, many drivers, depite their assertion that they are "Formula 1" material, are not . With a speed limit, drivers are able to make good judgement calls on what to do vis-a-vis other people on the road. How many deaths a year from driving? Quite a few Certainly, a massive amount more than guns are responsible for. I reckon the Ambulance services and Police view speeding as fairly serious, as they are the ones who have to scrape victims of it up afterwards.
    Its just unfortunate that the law has not updated to make killing via a vehicle murder/manslaughter as appropriate.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Málaga
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by wild75 View Post
    BUT there is a massive difference between driving well within the limits of the car and some, would be hard case packing a shoota.
    Indeed; a car lulls users in a false sense of security, packs far more Joules, kills a lót more people.

    Speeding with a car is VASTLY more of a risc than owning a gun. Just do the maths on the extra Joules.

    A gun furthermore is diametrically different form a car in that a gun is perceived as dangerous wherras cars are not hence the useres are fundamentally treating them differently. Cras ´provoke´ risc behaviour, guns the contrary.

    Me, I have raced anything on wheels for 23 years and don´t speed on the open road; if anything I am a moving road block únder the max. The max is after all just thát; a maximum and it is ok to go a bit slower. I strongly objet to speeding motorist overtaking as those are fáctually endangering the occupants of the overtaken car.
    The weight of acar x speed = adn véry few drivers are capable of controlling their vehicle if shit happens. I am yet don´t speed but I would want a live fire arm to be able to defend the home/family as law enforcement doesn´t.

    Attempting to deminish crime by banning guns is like ditto drunk driving by making it more difficult for sober people to obtain a driver´s license.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Dartford
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackel View Post
    perfect
    Air arms S400F beech with MTC Viper 3-12x44, AA silencer and custom hamster

    Nescio quid loquor

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Southend, Essex
    Posts
    2,501
    I've only just taken the time to read this post, so my tuppenceworth is a bit late.

    The OP claims 1949 deaths in the years 2010/11 through the illegal use of firearms.

    This figure, around 37 unlawfull killings per week, is total . The UK has around 600 murders per year and the vast majority do not involve firearms.

    ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 is a good starting point, given the OP uses it as his reference. Here is a link directly to it;

    http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publica...12?view=Binary

    If that doesn't work then here is a quote from page 55

    In 2010/11, there were 58 fatal injuries caused by the use of a firearm, an increase from the 40 recorded the previous year. The 58 fatal injuries recorded in 2010/11 include the 12 people killed by Derrick Bird in June 2010. However, serious injuries decreased by 18 per cent from 404 in 2009/10 to 330 in 2010/11, continuing the long-term downward trend.

    though on page 18 it says:

    In 2010/11, there were 60 shooting homicides recorded. This is an increase of 19 on the previous year and includes the 12 victims of the Cumbria shootings on 2 June 2010.

    Can't both be right, obviosly. But both figures a little less than the 1949 initially quoted.

    Now, ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 is a long document, 118 pages to be exact, I only glossed over the first few pages, then used the index to go direct to a few relevent pages, and didn't bother reading the rest. I would suggest that whoever posted this on the OPs club website didn't even bother to read the index.

    I've not posted this to start an arguement, more to question why no-one seems to have checked the facts, and why when as all the numbers quoted are wrong, the thread is a sticky.
    Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're probably right.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Chester
    Posts
    3,793
    The information is on my club's website and was also passed onto me by someone very well informed in a major shooting sports organization.
    The figures are certainly high. Perhaps others who have more time will comment.
    Graham
    Designer of BASC Logo

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Austell.
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavin2593 View Post
    I've only just taken the time to read this post, so my tuppenceworth is a bit late.

    The OP claims 1949 deaths in the years 2010/11 through the illegal use of firearms.

    This figure, around 37 unlawfull killings per week, is total . The UK has around 600 murders per year and the vast majority do not involve firearms.

    ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 is a good starting point, given the OP uses it as his reference. Here is a link directly to it;

    http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publica...12?view=Binary

    If that doesn't work then here is a quote from page 55

    In 2010/11, there were 58 fatal injuries caused by the use of a firearm, an increase from the 40 recorded the previous year. The 58 fatal injuries recorded in 2010/11 include the 12 people killed by Derrick Bird in June 2010. However, serious injuries decreased by 18 per cent from 404 in 2009/10 to 330 in 2010/11, continuing the long-term downward trend.

    though on page 18 it says:

    In 2010/11, there were 60 shooting homicides recorded. This is an increase of 19 on the previous year and includes the 12 victims of the Cumbria shootings on 2 June 2010.

    Can't both be right, obviosly. But both figures a little less than the 1949 initially quoted.

    Now, ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 is a long document, 118 pages to be exact, I only glossed over the first few pages, then used the index to go direct to a few relevent pages, and didn't bother reading the rest. I would suggest that whoever posted this on the OPs club website didn't even bother to read the index.

    I've not posted this to start an arguement, more to question why no-one seems to have checked the facts, and why when as all the numbers quoted are wrong, the thread is a sticky.
    Pity you didn't read the thread, it said "deaths and injuries".
    I like Cornish Pasties.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Newark
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by frontend loader View Post
    but in 1969 there wasn't as many Gangta's limping around was there
    Lmao what is it with the fake limp

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    abergavenny, South Wales
    Posts
    803
    I'm not so sure if those prove anything either way. Gun crime was rising steadily before the ban, it's kept rising but possibly at a slower rate than it would of if handguns weren't banned? Who knows? Clearly it didn't make the impact they made out it was going to make but no one can be sure of what really would of taken place
    Seal sets for the SMK XS78 QB78 TH78 XS79 AirGuns ~ £5 each posted

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Well, I had a goodly selection of handguns before the ban, and none of them were ever involved in crime while they were in MY possession. On the other paw, there is plenty of evidence that handguns that had been surrendered to the officers of law and order have turned up occasionally in hands of criminals, although I can't for the life of me understand just how that could have happened

    The majority of armed crime is still carried out with shotguns, rather than the handguns that we no longer own. It's true that there remains a quantifiable amount of use of replicas of one kind or another, but I've yet to see ANY crime committed by a crook wielding a Colt Model of 1873, or Broomhandle Mauser.

    tac

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    1,323

    Unhappy balanced view

    Quote Originally Posted by jetski View Post
    I'm not so sure if those prove anything either way. Gun crime was rising steadily before the ban, it's kept rising but possibly at a slower rate than it would of if handguns weren't banned? Who knows? Clearly it didn't make the impact they made out it was going to make but no one can be sure of what really would of taken place
    I applaud you on your balanced view. However it is true that most chrime is by illegal shooters, and that any loss of freedoms for the upright and honest citizen should be mourned. We will never get our guns back and we have done nothing to deserve such treatment by the so called keepers of democracy, justice and rule of law. atb., Paul

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •