+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: prosport hold sensitivity .177 vs .22

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    364

    prosport hold sensitivity .177 vs .22

    Hi i have the opportunity of a nice walnut prosport in .177, in my spring guns i normally shoot .22. Having a bit of a read online i keep coming across comments saying 'its a bit hold sensitive in .177' ect regarding the prosport.

    I know once mastered this isnt an issue but im looking for the best overall shooting experience. Im not bothered about the trajectory of the pellets at all so i dont want that to become part of the argument. I already shoot .177 .22 and .25. I am most interested in the shooting characteristics of the gun and which will give me the more smooth and pleasurable shooting experience. Any body had or shot both to compare? is there enough in it to sway it one way of the other? the gun isnt overly cheap and i would be happy to pay the extra few quid for a new .22 if it was worth doing

    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Watton, Norfolk
    Posts
    3,440
    Sorry this isn't an answer but I'm watching this with interest as I've decided on a new Prosport for my next rifle too; just the decision on calibre to be made now...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Liskeard, Cornwall
    Posts
    12,815
    Is this an urban myth? I've never owned a P/S, as I don't like the cocking action, but I've shot a fair few at the club.The only thing I can think of is that the balance point is a bit further back than, say, a TX or '97, so there may be a bit more muzzle flip, but is it noticable? Lighter rifles are usually more sensitive in .177, but the P/S is fairly heavy, there can't be much in it.

    Gus
    The ox is slow, but the earth is patient.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    1,446
    I have shot and owned both calibres of the prosport and the .22 is smoother but not by a massive margin.The .177's recoil is quick and short and slightly more noticeable than the .22,but still very pleasant to shoot.

    Not sure if that has helped you at all
    Life without happiness is no life at all.
    Melbourne Marksmen - Bell Target forever

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Bishops Stortford
    Posts
    1,324
    Had one in .22 and eventually converted it to .177 as I started shooting HFT and wanted to be competing against the larger number of .177 shooters.

    Definitly nicer in .22 to be honest. Though once mastered then perfectly accurate and shoot able in .177.

    It was hold sensitive. I had to have my fore hand in EXACTLY the same spot EVERY time. I now shoot a HW80 in .177 fully v-glided with 25mm cylinder and a CS500 stock. I have to be honest and say I'm struggling with the quick lock time on this. I could shoot my prosport much better, but then I had had it for a while. I also found my trigger hand would hurt in the wrist. I think it was the set back pistol grip? It became a problem for me, plus I hated the cocking leaver so sold it on. Wish I hadn't sometimes though. Would have another!

    FYI, I wound never convert one again as it was a bitch of a job!

  6. #6
    Hsing-ee is offline I don't have the slightest association with the lingerie industry
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,810
    It's not that hold sensitive, unless you have only shot PCPs all your life. Bit of practice and you'll be shooting tiny groups. Try shooting a BSF B55! That requires real skill to get accuracy.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    364
    thanks for the feedback people. I have have only once had a .177 springer and it was a hw97k. I think it was the quick lock time and the fast sharp poky sort of feeling i couldnt get on with, i tired a full fettle and vmach kit but sold it on....my .22 Tuned HW95 blew it out the water.

    I think i have confirmed my suspicions and will hold out for a nice .22 walnut

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire
    Posts
    998

    Nice review here

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYXuO...e_gdata_player

    49 metres and accurate

    Worth a quick watch ?

    Vince

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    364
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QaCvOgRIjY

    bit of guess work but still......

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near Reigate, Surrey
    Posts
    16,073
    The PS is a lovely rifle in both calibres. Obviously the .22 is smoother but then .22 always is smoother than .177 when legal limit rifles are involved.
    'It may be that your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others'.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    middlesbrough
    Posts
    1,143
    my next rifle will be a TX and i was in the same boat, i normally get my springers in .22 but was thinking i might get the TX in .177 as its a heavy lump but after reading this thread i think i will stick to my rule of .22 in a springer and .177 in a pcp...........sorted

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    st neots
    Posts
    1,084
    I never really found my .177 prosport to be too bad on hold sensitivity. I guess its what you are used to, if you come from a well tuned hw97 then yes it is, if you come from a webley longbow or other light weight full power bb then no it isnt.
    So, better than some, worse than others

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    649
    Initially struggled a bit with my .177 PS but persevered with fine tuning. I have a UKNeil silencer which gives a little more weight at the muzzle end and a Vortek Oseal on the piston. Now I would say that it is better than my Lazaglided .22 97K was. It feels as good as a pcp inside my springer ranges (35yd max) I am very pleased with it and there is absolutely no hold sensitivity/muzzle flip to worry about.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Watton, Norfolk
    Posts
    3,440
    I'm pretty sure both will be good to shoot, however I'm leaning towards one in .177 calibre after reading this despite knowing that .22 will likely be smoother to shoot out of the box. My HW80 (.22) is on ticket and at 20fpe is pretty lively anyway, so I think a Prosport in .177 shouldn't pose too many problems... (he thinks, hopefully)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    3,388
    Drop the stroke 14mm or so and it will be a lot LESS hold sensitive.

    Found the same when i sleeved the hw80, with 80mm stroke the .22 was horrid, very very hard to shoot, dropped 10mm off the stroke and it transformed it.

    The sooner someone starts making +14mm piston rods for the TX/PS piston Mk3 the better IMO, or a snap on piston cap that will do the same.
    The longer rod is the better option, it allows for a longer spring.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts