Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: .17 Rem - Remington 700LVSF

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Higham
    Posts
    8,323
    I have a Sako 17 FB and load the Bergers to 1.800 OAL and the Vmax to 1.830 OAL and they shoot to the same POI and are both very very accurate.

  2. #2
    Ruger_shooter's Avatar
    Ruger_shooter is offline Meadowlark Lemon's Personal Tailor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Derry, N.Ireland
    Posts
    11,646
    Nice write up and three nice shots. Any pictures to share?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Maidstone
    Posts
    334
    Thanks for the input guys. The stock is standard I think and I always thought they were all HS Precision ones, but I could easily be wrong. Its got the soft rubber recoil pad which tends to go a bit sticky with age.

    I would put some pictures up but cannot seem to be able to add them to the original post or to this for some reason - if anyone is able to help me I'd be happy to put a couple up!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Leominster
    Posts
    16

    Unhappy 17 rem

    Excellent info provided but got me undecided now whether a CZ is the best option for .22 purchase or am I leaning toward a .17 the number of reviews lately in the shooting mags all seem to be praising this caliber much along the same lines as your comments. A recently read article /thread (cant quite remember which seem to be overloaded at the mo with fresh info) suggested that there could be considerable deviation in trajectory during shooting in strong winds with the .17 ?confused

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    WORCESTER
    Posts
    14,541
    Quote Originally Posted by andyhitman View Post
    Excellent info provided but got me undecided now whether a CZ is the best option for .22 purchase or am I leaning toward a .17 the number of reviews lately in the shooting mags all seem to be praising this caliber much along the same lines as your comments. A recently read article /thread (cant quite remember which seem to be overloaded at the mo with fresh info) suggested that there could be considerable deviation in trajectory during shooting in strong winds with the .17 ?confused

    Dont confuse the 17 rem and 17 hmr there completely different beasts

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Frith on the hills
    Posts
    2,150
    The 17 rem is truly a superb calibre which punches massively above its weight.

    Over the years, I have owned at least five 17 rem rifles and have fired many thousands of rounds in this cal - And I am probably this cals biggest fan and completely biased toward it.

    Once you get the powder / bullet combo right - Its hard not to love it. - Low noise and virtually recoiless - trajectory of a 220 swift for half the powder.

    In the past I have pushed the little 20 grn Vmax at 4460 fps - Considering it only uses 22 + grns of powder and has all the attributes listed above and is undoubtedly one of the best point and squirt rifles IMO

    My latest 17 rem has a Pacnor 9 twist fitted, and zaps the excellent and deadly 25grn Vmax at 3940 fps - using a mere 21.5 grn / Vit 133 to do so.

    With a little practice, vermin at 400 - 500 yrds is achiveble in the right conditions. The 17 rem is also an excellent fox calibre - Albiet it doesnt have the hitting power of the bigger 22's ands 6mm pills

    Safety wise, With the 17 FB - It has to be the safest centre fire calibre I know of. I can honestly say - I have never had a single bullet richocet in thousands of rounds

    With the exception of the 30 grn Berger bullet - The 17 cal bullet rarely exits TBH therefore delivers its full payload of energy into the target.

    Not much more to say - Except , anybody thinking of this calibre - dont listen to the guys who say they are barrel burners - they foul up every 15 shots

    Its and more often than not, comes from people with no direct experience or bought a knackered shot out rifle.

    Driven at sensible speeds you will get alot of shots out of a barrel - Probably more in fact than a 204 which uses between 4 - 8 grains of propellent more per shot.

    A friend of mine has over 2500 round out of his Shillen barrel and it is still bug holing.


    One last point - I have had a Remmy LVSF and I too struggled for accuracy , untill I removed the two "Pips" in the H&S stock that touch the barrel - as Rich said - try pushing the 25 grn Vmax toward 4K


    ATB
    Alan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northallerton
    Posts
    1,396
    Sako A1, 17 Rem, perfect.
    If we weren't supposed to eat animals they wouldn't be made out of meat.....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Leominster
    Posts
    16

    17 rem

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie g View Post
    Dont confuse the 17 rem and 17 hmr there completely different beasts
    Aaah there in lies my confusion, thanks for clearing that up for me cheers , Andy

  9. #9
    leadpig is offline sheet lead welder extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    isle of man
    Posts
    5,404
    Quote Originally Posted by Spanner. View Post
    I have a Sako 17 FB and load the Bergers to 1.800 OAL and the Vmax to 1.830 OAL and they shoot to the same POI and are both very very accurate.
    i have a rem 700vssf in fb,good ain’t they

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Carlisle, Lakes UK
    Posts
    2,659

    Thumbs up

    Excellent It moderates well too, doesn't it
    I'd try shoving the vmaxes a little faster mate. Get them up nearer 4k
    Marksmanship = Accuracy, Consistency, Observation and a little of The Force
    SharpshootingUK www.sharpshootinguk.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •