I have a 280 in .22 and a 34 in each calibre. All full length rifles. The 34 is only very slightly larger than the 280 in overall size. Both handle very nicely and feel similar in that respect. Remember the 280 has fibre optic sights.
The firing cycle is different, due to the different stroke lengths. Not at all sure what I prefer. Like them both. I think the 34 suits .177 cal very well. All of mine are mild mannered but I've read the 280 carbine can be less so in .177.
All of mine seem well built, with good bluing and with none of the faults described above. You may well find it devoid or short of factory lubrication, though.
I think you would be happy with either model, although the 34 Premium undoubtedly looks to best.
I've got both in .177 and I like em , both were bone dry when purchased but relatively easy to fix that. The 34 is a bit hold sensitive but accurate once mastered the 280 less hold sensitive but just as accurate neither have had out more than lube and a check over .
LOL You must be joking especially the new HW's with the star breech and the screw on lock up bits.
The 34 has one of the best breech and barrel hinge set ups of all the break barrels, (the most robust also)
Metal to Metal cylinder to breech barrel stop and seal,
Twin spring ball catch,
Properly machined block to take bearing washers and a hardened steel sleeve for the barrel hinge bolt.
And even the new 34's once tuned like SFS does (Watch the video) will easy match or better a New HW
Meh! You'd stick up for them whatever, ain't exactly compelling evidence is it?
With the one's from the last few years I think it's simply a combination of the breech seal and ball detent preventing the angled breech from seating the same every time.
My ignore list: <Hidden information>
Plinkerer and Tinkerer