Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: HW77 .177 transfer port size

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    connahs quay
    Posts
    902

    HW77 .177 transfer port size

    Hi chap's in 1993 I bought a 77k in .177 with a 25mm piston . Back then most people were fitting OX kits including me Anyway a year later I sold it to a mate and he has had it since then . The other week I managed to buy it back after 19 years and I stripped it . The ox was still in there so degreased etc and plan to fit a standard spring when I get 1 . But all them years ago I cant remember if i opened up the transfer port when I fitted the OX kit , just wondering if anyone knows the standard size so I can check it ATB Mike
    A few nice rifles

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hatfield Broad Oak, Essex/Herts CM22
    Posts
    3,967
    I think it's 2.8mm or something like that. If yours is bigger than 3mm you opened it up

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    connahs quay
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by brucegill View Post
    I think it's 2.8mm or something like that. If yours is bigger than 3mm you opened it up
    Cheer's Bruce I'll get the caliper out , fingers crossed E'h
    A few nice rifles

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wingham, 5 miles NW of Baz
    Posts
    5,660
    I run all my 77s and 97s with a 3.2mm TP

    I have a special "Gold" drill bit just for that job.

    3.6mm is still perfectly fine but if it's over 4.0mm then it's sleeve-down time.

    JB swore by 4mm so it seems the TP diameter is variable but different sizes will obviously affect the shot cycle considerably.

    I like 3.2mm myself

    Matty
    Opportunity is missed by most people, because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Could optimal tp size depend on the spring as well?
    The mention of the 'Maximiser' reminded me of my own, new in about 1984, HW77k.
    The Maximiser tuning kit was all the rage then and I bought one as all the adverts promised me it would transform the feel of the standard rifle. It was my first attempt at any form of tuning so I leapt at the chance. I sweated all morning to get it fitted. I remember the square section spring (Ox??) took a lot of preload and I did not have a compressor of any sort. But I did it ..... all fitted with the minimum of spilt blood.
    What a transformation. From a pretty docile but bit twangy rifle I now had a rifle that bucked and jerked around in my grasp. I had no chrono so did not know what it was doing; but assumed it was still within spec. But I hated the firing cycle. Late afternoon I took it apart again and refitted the original spring. All became nice again ... the piston liner and 'debur' carried out as per Maximiser instructions had helped. No more twang and a good sweet firing cycle.
    The rifle stayed like that for about 20 years when a chrono check showed power was declining so I put a new standard UK power spring in. A chrono check revealed power ott so spring reduction was needed. No problem.
    I have never touched the transfer port.

    Cheers, Phil

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,440

    The factory port size is 3mm

    or .118" if you want the decimal size.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    Could optimal tp size depend on the spring as well?
    The mention of the 'Maximiser' reminded me of my own, new in about 1984, HW77k.
    The Maximiser tuning kit was all the rage then and I bought one as all the adverts promised me it would transform the feel of the standard rifle. It was my first attempt at any form of tuning so I leapt at the chance. I sweated all morning to get it fitted. I remember the square section spring (Ox??) took a lot of preload and I did not have a compressor of any sort. But I did it ..... all fitted with the minimum of spilt blood.
    What a transformation. From a pretty docile but bit twangy rifle I now had a rifle that bucked and jerked around in my grasp. I had no chrono so did not know what it was doing; but assumed it was still within spec. But I hated the firing cycle. Late afternoon I took it apart again and refitted the original spring. All became nice again ... the piston liner and 'debur' carried out as per Maximiser instructions had helped. No more twang and a good sweet firing cycle.
    The rifle stayed like that for about 20 years when a chrono check showed power was declining so I put a new standard UK power spring in. A chrono check revealed power ott so spring reduction was needed. No problem.
    I have never touched the transfer port.

    Cheers, Phil
    Hi Phil,
    Nice little write up. I'm sure many fell for these kits/springs back then, resulting in harsh firing cycles, probably OTT power and maybe the square edges of the square section springs nibbling away at the precious internals. I just thank my lucky stars that I never fell for them....I stripped and serviced a few rifles belonging to friends, all containing Ox springs. At least two HW35s and a Mercury to two, and all became much nicer once fitted with nice, sensible, round springs.

    I know some have posted on here that some of the square section springs, such as the ones HW fitted to the 97 as standard for a while, were actually fine, as they didn't exhibit those nasty, sharp edges.

    And, yes, big time. Any tune, on any gun, will be down to balance. So a certain TP size will suit a certain set-up better than another. There will be cases, however, where the standard size is too small or large for any ideal set-up, I bet. And, as Matty Boy says, yes, by the sounds of it, with the 77 you can go right out to 4mm, depending on personal preference. A TP this wide would be a bad move on many guns with longer TPs, due to more lost volume, certainly at our power level.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hatfield Broad Oak, Essex/Herts CM22
    Posts
    3,967
    Quote Originally Posted by MattyBoy View Post
    I run all my 77s and 97s with a 3.2mm TP

    I have a special "Gold" drill bit just for that job.

    3.6mm is still perfectly fine but if it's over 4.0mm then it's sleeve-down time.

    JB swore by 4mm so it seems the TP diameter is variable but different sizes will obviously affect the shot cycle considerably.

    I like 3.2mm myself

    Matty
    Hi Matty

    Do you just drill yours out, or do you ream them as well?

    Cheers for the info
    Bruce

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saxmundham
    Posts
    1,504
    When asked JB said he used to use a 5/32" drill on FWBs, HW77s etc but advised against doing it unless the rest of the conversion that he did was carried out. He used a 5mm drill for HW80s

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    4mm is perfectly safe on a 77, work out the static compression ratio and you will see why. A Diana 52 has a 6mm long TP with seal length and in unrestricted mode has 4mm dia TP...no different.

    peak power comes under 4mm but not by much, i often see gains over over 1fpe going from 3 to the sweet spot with the same spring and preload, this then allows the spring to be backed off etc.

    If using an O ring head the TP needs to be a tad smaller than on a synthetic seal, this is to raise the compression, O ring heads are more efficient and make power easier, so a smaller TP can be used and you get the same results.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hatfield Broad Oak, Essex/Herts CM22
    Posts
    3,967
    If you open up the TP on a 77 from standard to 3.5 (for augments sake), would it require less preload or more to get the same power levels?

    Thanks
    B

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    Bruce, peak power is not produced with a TP of 3mm, that means a TP of 3mm is not efficient. As you increase the TP dia the power grows till eventually it peaks and for a small further increase in TP dia you can tune the distance from the breech face the piston stops before slamming into the breech face...so you can tune the bounce point.

    Peak power is around 3.9mm, 4mm gets the piston a little closer to the breech face (and lets not forget piston weight plays a part also)

    So if you increase efficiency you can use a weaker spring...however this may not be ideal but often does result in less felt recoil.

    On an O ring piston you need to go smaller with TP dia as the pistons fly faster and generally the O ring is more efficient with less lost volume, so peak efficiency may be 3.5mm...i fell in the trap of expecting an o ring head to work like a synthetic seal ...they don't.

    So quick answer is it should require less preload.

    I tested 3 to 4.2mm in .1mm steps and settled on 3.9, i know Wonky likes 3.9 also, JB likes 5/32 which is just a nats over 3.9, T20 uses 4mm, BTDT runs 4mm on his 77k....the list is long for rifles that all run very close to the same transfer port dia...now ask yourself why

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wingham, 5 miles NW of Baz
    Posts
    5,660
    In answer to Bruce, I just drill them then polish them with Autosol on a boot lace .

    In answer to Tony, in that case I'll be taking my ports out from 3.2mm to 3.8mm immediately

    Matty
    Opportunity is missed by most people, because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hatfield Broad Oak, Essex/Herts CM22
    Posts
    3,967
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtoe01 View Post
    Bruce, peak power is not produced with a TP of 3mm, that means a TP of 3mm is not efficient. As you increase the TP dia the power grows till eventually it peaks and for a small further increase in TP dia you can tune the distance from the breech face the piston stops before slamming into the breech face...so you can tune the bounce point.

    Peak power is around 3.9mm, 4mm gets the piston a little closer to the breech face (and lets not forget piston weight plays a part also)

    So if you increase efficiency you can use a weaker spring...however this may not be ideal but often does result in less felt recoil.

    On an O ring piston you need to go smaller with TP dia as the pistons fly faster and generally the O ring is more efficient with less lost volume, so peak efficiency may be 3.5mm...i fell in the trap of expecting an o ring head to work like a synthetic seal ...they don't.

    So quick answer is it should require less preload.

    I tested 3 to 4.2mm in .1mm steps and settled on 3.9, i know Wonky likes 3.9 also, JB likes 5/32 which is just a nats over 3.9, T20 uses 4mm, BTDT runs 4mm on his 77k....the list is long for rifles that all run very close to the same transfer port dia...now ask yourself why
    Many thanks Tony! Better find some nice drill bits

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyBoy View Post
    In answer to Bruce, I just drill them then polish them with Autosol on a boot lace .

    In answer to Tony, in that case I'll be taking my ports out from 3.2mm to 3.8mm immediately

    Matty
    Thanks Matty!

    Appreciate the info guys

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    remember however, if the gun you have is nice already, why alter it?

    If you must experiment drill the TP to 4.2mm and tap to m5, get some 6mm long m5 grubscrews and have them drilled from 3 to 4mm in .1mm steps, use a little blue loctite to hold them in and seal the threads, you can now play with TP dia and see what works for you

    A little heat and an allen key gets them out, run the tap back in to clean the threads and screw a new one in to resume testing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •