Stroke lengths, TP sizes and SCR for various springers...

[brucegill]

One I'm very interested in is the 99s!

Also the LGV, TX etc...

[nat1]

Nice idea,
as well as standard figures listed for each model, do people on here have "optimized" figures for say 11.3ftlb running sweetly that could be added along side or is there no such thing as optimum!!!!!

Atb,Woody.

[brucegill]

Nice idea,
as well standard figures listed for each model, do people on here have "optimized" figures for say 11.3ftlb running sweetly that could be added along side or is there no such thing as optimum!!!!!

Atb,Woody.

Thanks bud. Not sure if there's an optimum for a set power..... Hopefullyone of the guys who understand this more will post

just about to add SCR values.

[brucegill]

Ok, added SCR's for the rifles listed so far......


Can someone check my figures? I'm getting confused! (Have made a spread sheet up so its all automated....)

Looking at the SCR for say the early 77 and the 80, the 80 should shoot nicer than the 77 Or at least it's closer to the preferred 300:1-500:1

I'm guessing Piston weight must be playing a major factor here!

[Snooper601]

Ok, added SCR's for the rifles listed so far......


Can someone check my figures? I'm getting confused! (Have made a spread sheet up so its all automated....)

Looking at the SCR for say the early 77 and the 80, the 80 should shoot nicer than the 77 Or at least it's closer to the preferred 300:1-500:1

I'm guessing Piston weight must be playing a major factor here!

Hi Bruce, its probably worth adding a swept volume column to save calculator punching

The SCR is difficult as the target value depends on port length as the gas flow through the port is restricted more by a longer port, it's an indicator of when it will slam or bounce.

Cheers

John

[bigtoe01]

95/98/new 85 are 85mm stoke, not 86, all depends what seal is fitted obviously

If I get a chance i will boot the old machine up and get my notes off it, however only the stock stuff, not what i set.

[T 20]

however only the stock stuff, not what i set.

I can't blame you for that Tony --- I've just been watching that bloke on you tube who's nicking your ideas.

I've just watched him put grooves in an 80 piston that was running offset in the chuck --- and his Student sounds like a lorry engine with a knock.






All the best Mick

[brucegill]

95/98/new 85 are 85mm stoke, not 86, all depends what seal is fitted obviously

If I get a chance i will boot the old machine up and get my notes off it, however only the stock stuff, not what i set.

Thanks Tony. Amended. I've found a few of the figures from your posts on various forums, but won't put anything up that's not stock.

Any nay figures and help appreciated. Just trying to get my head around it all!

[deejayuu]

Thanks T20. I'll just go and work out the ....

[ricardolamos]

Are you sure HW 35 transfer port lengths are correct as the quoted length is about an inch?

[brucegill]

Hi Bruce, its probably worth adding a swept volume column to save calculator punching

The SCR is difficult as the target value depends on port length as the gas flow through the port is restricted more by a longer port, it's an indicator of when it will slam or bounce.

Cheers

John

Hi John

Sorry, I missed your post.... Have added Swept Vol. Will add TP Vol. shortly. After that, I won't be adding any more columns as its a PITA in HTML.

Can I get some TX info off you?? Looks like we have MK3 details. Would be great to have MK1/2 and a check on the above figures mate!

ATVB
Bruce

[T 20]

This may help a bit Bruce

http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/v...ingerchart.gif





All the best Mick