Originally Posted by
Hsing-ee
Tracker and Viscount are exactly the same inside.
The Osprey was an odd fish (or fish-eating bird, whatever).
It had to take over from the venerated Webley Mk III underlever which filled the roles of target gun and sporting rifle.
So perhaps they designed it with 10m and 6 yard comps first - hence the massive barrel which is not that out of place on the Osprey Supertarget, but then fitted a slim shotgun-style stock to the sporting version. The Supertarget got a lighter spring as well.
Webley ended up with a rifle that could not compete either against other recoilling rifles for match shooting like the Walther 55 and Weihrauch 55, other than on price OR against the sporting competition like the Airsporter or HW35.
But the standard one handled like no other rifle, with a heavy barrel keeping you on aim and the very slight pistol grip giving a feeling of grace like a nice shotgun. It is a rifle designed for shooting rats in barns, in .22 calibre of course. And quite a looker. The Tracker was never quite as cool, the thin barrel and Vulcan stock style were a bit dull.
A standard Osprey, with an improved trigger and a Tracker powerplant would be a lovely tool. The Swedes are great fans of the Tracker, or maybe Webley dumped alot of them up there cheap. They know how to get the best from them so they say.
Also, it was a BIG mistake to name it after a breakfast cereal bar. Would have been so much better to call it the Viscount (named after the nuclear bomber of the 60s?) from the beginning.
I've always fancied a Viscount Delux, the one with the walnut stock. Oh no, another thing to collect... and I thought I was done.