Airsporter VS Webley Mk III

[Hsing-ee]

It seems that there are more people on here that like BSA Airsporters than those that like the Webley Mk III... which is strange because I was lead to believe by AGW in the 70s and 80s that the Mk III had a very big following amongst the Senior members of the airgun fraternity.

I like the Airsporter more, a the Webley has a strange pistol grip and stock, is lower powered and is not as pretty. The build quality is high, but its not a rifle I have ever had any attraction or sympathy for.

[Rickenbacker]

I voted 'both good', but only because of the MK1 & MK2 'sporters. Later Airsporters - I wouldn't give them cupboard room.

I did love the Webley MK3 I had, and to me, it felt nicer than a BSA.

Also fancied my long slabby Original mod 50 in a similar way

[I. J.]

I voted 'both good', but only because of the MK1 & MK2 'sporters. Later Airsporters - I wouldn't give them cupboard room.

Agreed, but the later 'S' variants had a certain class and Ive seen some Mk 3s with some outstanding wood work so I voted for both.

[DEAN C.]

Agreed, but the later 'S' variants had a certain class and Ive seen some Mk 3s with some outstanding wood work so I voted for both.

The thing for me is that the Airsporter is probably the best looking gun ever, well until the Prosport came a long.
And the Airsporter balances better for me.

[red bob]

this comparison has surfaced many times over the years on forums and over cups of teas in gunshops and dubious brews in country pubs.
and not without good reason ;they both represent routes of airgun history equally valid in their own right and have a following to suit.
my personnel preference as an engineer is with the mk3 [early types] but harking back to when they were the current airguns of choice ,the airsporter was on the wish list of aspiring air-gunners in my neck of the woods never heard mention of the webley .i have an example of each and admire both for different reasons with the weight of preference falling in favour of the mk3. on one occasion i had both out on the bench for maintenance when my mrs passed by and asked what model it was pointing to the bsa, and commented that it was one of the best looking air-rifle i had;this is from someone with no interest what so ever in airguns !;if it were for looks alone the airsporter would be streets ahead.these threads are always interesting and lead to various comparisons that had not occurred to me and learn from; one notable alternative was the fwb v orig 45.there are many others to boot .

[johnbaz]

Some mk3s


Some Airsporters.. And a few other beesas..



John

[hwtyger]

Cant comment on the BSA, do have 2 mk3's, their quality/finish is better than any other brand I've seen.

[DEAN C.]

Well I voted for both good in their own way.

But I sold the only MK3 Webley that I owned and currently own seven Airsporters. The webley just doesnt do anything for me.

[Hsing-ee]

Well I voted for both good in their own way.

But I sold the only MK3 Webley that I owned and currently own seven Airsporters. The webley just doesnt do anything for me.

That is what I feel about it - even though the rifle has a less tank-like level of engineering and a better trigger. The Mk III cocking lever is much nicer than the Airsporter one for example... but the low comb and general feel is not nearly as appealing as the BSA.

[T 20]

The Webley MK3 was a copy of a German gun that was a copy of a pre war BSA.

The BSA Airsporter on the other hand was the natural evolution of the prewar BSA and was the dogs bollocks.



All the best Mick

[johnbaz]

I like them both and have a few of each (More Airsporters than mk3 by a long shot!!)

Seen the most gawjuss Mk3 today though that was chequered and refinished

I wanted it... nay.. I NEEDED it!!

John

[FattMann]

I cant choose have and love them both