Slight thread driftage here, but at what point does a new cheaper rifle become a better prospect than an equally priced second hand example?
I've noticed that the vast majority of threads started about cheap new rifles enevitibly end up extolling the virtues of buying second hand, but how do the two options balance up?
With a new rifle you get a warranty, you can just go to a shop that stocks it and pick it straight up, you don't have to spend time finding a decent example of the model you've chosen...
I'm not saying that buying second hand is wrong, just wondering when/if buying new is the better option?
Back on thread; Gamo whisper IGT, decent value and pretty good performance for under 200 quid.
HW98 .177, Falcon Menace 4.5-18x56, WW tune HW97 blue laminate .177, Hawke eclipse 4-16x50 ir BSA Scorpion se tactical .177 ,BSA deerhunter 6.5-32×46 SMK XS78, .22 3-9x40 Mountmaster- Remington Express xp tactical .22, standard - Gamo CF20 .177 - mk1 meteor .177