Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 78

Thread: I'm looking for an alternative to needle roller bearings (springers)

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    999
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    also item #161101602948 looks like it might be small enough to fit in a piston @ 21mm ? however 8mm bore too tight for a TX / HW IIRC...
    From my measurements on a 25mm piston, it would need to be 10mm ID and 22mm OD to fit perfectly. I can't find one though..

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Neots
    Posts
    582
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtoe01 View Post
    I just caved in and ordered some also...however, been thinking today, I think the ultimate setup would be rotating piston and rotating comp tube on an under lever rifle...not sure if it could be done however. I have an idea how it could be done BUT it would take some surgery unless the gun was designed that way...food for thought.
    Rotating comp tube! Love it, keep it up

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hatfield Broad Oak, Essex/Herts CM22
    Posts
    3,967
    Hhaha. I caved in too lol. Always assumed it was a bit of a gimmick or if it would survive for long. But winter is here, need a few projects.

    I was just thinking about a rotating comp tube, and if it would help, or even work. Spooky.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Neots
    Posts
    582
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki_79 View Post
    From my measurements on a 25mm piston, it would need to be 10mm ID and 22mm OD to fit perfectly. I can't find one though..
    No, I cant either. I have one, which I found in an adjustable TFT stand.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Burntwood Nr Walsall
    Posts
    867

    Thumbs up Answers Please Guys

    Quote Originally Posted by vobster View Post
    I have only one needle roller bearing that will fit the piston of a hw97, they seem to be as rare as a very rare thing as no one seems to sell them in the correct size.

    Alternatives? Needle rollers really kill the twist on firing, standard greased washers arent even close.

    Has anyone found something else that works? PTFE washers etc?

    Thanks!
    I'm most interested to learn about this please, so:

    Does this twist come from the spring unwinding as it is released from compression?

    Does this turning effort cause muzzle movement and/or anything else deteremental?

    If these needle rollers are so economical as we see here and effective too, why don't the o/e engineers specify them, given the economy of scale firms like AA & Weirauch have?

    Should every springer Have them?

    Many thanks for your expertise...
    Seize the Day! Quigley Hollow is a great place to start.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Neots
    Posts
    582
    Does this twist come from the spring unwinding as it is released from compression?..... Yes.

    Does this turning effort cause muzzle movement and/or anything else deteremental?......I find rifles can pull right, but with a bearing they are straight, forward-back.

    If these needle rollers are so economical as we see here and effective too, why don't the o/e engineers specify them, given the economy of scale firms like AA & Weirauch have?.......They are not really designed for high compression load, just light load and twisting.

    Should every springer Have them?...ask me in ten or twenty years if one has come apart. It could be bad, small hardened bits of metal floating around inside your springer.

    Buyer beware!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    Quote Originally Posted by vobster View Post
    Does this twist come from the spring unwinding as it is released from compression?..... Yes.

    Does this turning effort cause muzzle movement and/or anything else deteremental?......I find rifles can pull right, but with a bearing they are straight, forward-back.

    If these needle rollers are so economical as we see here and effective too, why don't the o/e engineers specify them, given the economy of scale firms like AA & Weirauch have?.......They are not really designed for high compression load, just light load and twisting.

    Should every springer Have them?...ask me in ten or twenty years if one has come apart. It could be bad, small hardened bits of metal floating around inside your springer.

    Buyer beware!
    The idea is its not being smashed as such at the trigger end, just having differing loads applied to it, plus the spring only needs a bearing really at one end and either would do with the rear being the easy option.

    For the front a tophat and slip washer is all thats needed really, i usually run the same on the rear (slip washer and bearing washer) but decided to give one of these a go on the TX....so we shall see.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Plant City FL, 22 miles east of Tampa
    Posts
    1,453
    I have several I removed from a couple of guns. A tuner over here used to use them, but I really didn't notice an accuracy difference. The bearing is sandwiched between 2 thin hardened washers so the pieces would be captured if it failed. I have 1 for the piston as well and will try to find it. There really isn't much load on a TX because it takes years and years to wear the paint on the end plug with just a washer in place. I may drop some of the bearings back in 1 of my guns, but don't hold your breath. On a FAC TX there isn't room due to coil bind unless you use a shorter spring. One TX I own had an Ox spring with the bearings on both ends and it had survived for many 1,000's of shots with no wear. It was an ex U.S. and World champ FT gun and is still very accurate, even without the bearings.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Heerenveen
    Posts
    272
    I used to own a Pro Sport with a thrust bearing between rear guide and trigger block. The guide was custom made to accept one half of the bearing, the other half was set in the trigger block. This was a roller bearing consisting of three parts if I remember correctly.
    I too did not notice any difference in accuracy. It was still running the full 98mm stroke and was very hold sensitive.
    Challenge HFT .177 16J | Optisan 10x44 | HW50S .22 16J | Fomei 4x32 | HW95K .177 LB 16J | Valiant 4x32 | HW80K .22 LB 26J | Valiant 4x32 | HW97K .177 16J | Schmidt & Bender 10x42

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    wadebridge cornwall
    Posts
    1,989
    just skimmed through the thread [late for work] lol .. so appologies if its already been mentioned, but does anyone have a link for a thrust baering that would fit my tx ?
    TINKERING WITH PASTY POWER

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,036
    Quote Originally Posted by slinger69 View Post
    I'm most interested to learn about this please, so:

    Does this twist come from the spring unwinding as it is released from compression?

    Does this turning effort cause muzzle movement and/or anything else deteremental?

    If these needle rollers are so economical as we see here and effective too, why don't the o/e engineers specify them, given the economy of scale firms like AA & Weirauch have?

    Should every springer Have them?

    Many thanks for your expertise...
    Hi Gwyn,

    Yes, the idea would be to negate the effect of twist from the spring unwinding.

    I've mentioned this example on a couple of other threads.....

    A few months ago I had the pleasure of shooting Kieran Turner's LGV Comp Ultra. As most will be aware, this rifle has a rotating piston. Kieran had not done anything other than strip, degrease and relube. And it shot beautifully.

    Indoor range, high mag scope. Very, very accurate and easy to use. However, probably due to the fact that it was SO refined to shoot and, possibly, the high mag scope, a small twisting movement was evident. This is what keeps making me think that a bearing arrangement (however conceived - flat surfaces / thrust washers etc) would be preferable to a rotating piston, isolating any rotation WITHIN the piston body and not bring transferred to the cylinder walls via the rotating piston. Nothing new and many before have thought along these lines. Many also having put it into practice....Unlike me, where it's just in my head. Must play with this.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Neots
    Posts
    582
    Well, its nice to hear from a few people that the trust bearings have not flown apart

    To give an example of the benefits of fitting one, my old brum longbow is a good example. 10ftlb, plently of recoil and a twist/pull, which with the wrong hold, send a pellet right. Most days I dont see it if I'm on the ball, but it will pop up if my mind wanders.
    With the bearing fitted the recoil is straight, yes I still need to be very mindful how I hold it as its a lively little bugger, but I find the rifle easier to shoot with the bearing in, than out.
    I know this rifle well, and shot it almost exclusively for 2 years most weekends in hft comps, so any changes I make to it are pretty obvious.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    999
    Quote Originally Posted by vobster View Post
    No, I cant either. I have one, which I found in an adjustable TFT stand.
    Found one: http://www.nadella.js.cn/bearings/AX1022.html

    A few places appear stock them, try phoning Brammer.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Neots
    Posts
    582
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki_79 View Post
    Found one: http://www.nadella.js.cn/bearings/AX1022.html

    A few places appear stock them, try phoning Brammer.
    Sweet!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Pontypridd
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by vobster View Post
    Well, its nice to hear from a few people that the trust bearings have not flown apart

    To give an example of the benefits of fitting one, my old brum longbow is a good example. 10ftlb, plently of recoil and a twist/pull, which with the wrong hold, send a pellet right. Most days I dont see it if I'm on the ball, but it will pop up if my mind wanders.
    With the bearing fitted the recoil is straight, yes I still need to be very mindful how I hold it as its a lively little bugger, but I find the rifle easier to shoot with the bearing in, than out.
    I know this rifle well, and shot it almost exclusively for 2 years most weekends in hft comps, so any changes I make to it are pretty obvious.
    I have been running a test with a bearing on the spring guide on my HW77 and BSA Mercury, a couple of thousand shots later, not even a mark on the slip washers, which is logical as delrin survives this task so why wouldn't a hardened and ground lubricated bearing?

    And there is a definite difference with and without the bearing, you don't need the piston to rotate if you cancel out the motion that rotates it in the first place, but if your already running a rotating piston (TX,Pro Sport etc) your not going to benefit , it only works on non rotating pistons because they don't rotate, that's the whole point really!
    Last edited by Artfull-Bodger; 03-12-2014 at 03:51 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •