If there was a low effort (comparable to a springer) single stroke pneumatic, full power rifle on the market, what would be the objections to buying one?
Why would you choose a springer if a viable ssp was available?
If there was a low effort (comparable to a springer) single stroke pneumatic, full power rifle on the market, what would be the objections to buying one?
Why would you choose a springer if a viable ssp was available?
I think you answered your own question there. SSP's at or near the limit are cumbersome beasts that require a knack to cock. Theyre great, but not really a break barrel replacement.
My ignore list: <Hidden information>
An SSP still takes longer to reload and cock than my Super 10, Rapid, Mk 3, Walther, Galatian...
I'll bring my PH Dragon to the bash (if Mick allows it - at least it's still self contained !)
Well worth trying if anyone hasn't seen one, very manageable cocking.
Its mechanically impossible !!!! ( Fairy dust was quoted )
A springer is approximately 30% efficient , ( This is due entirely to the compression (Exothermically ) Generating heat &
expressing itself as a higher pressure ) Albeit for a very short time ,
Hence the short barrel will syndrome !
The " Pump ups " on the other hand are approximately 5 % Efficient ( These are not my numbers )
When the compressed air is released, it cools rapidly ( Endothermic ) This expresses itself in a purported less volume, Hence less efficient .
I have had almost all the SSP,s & Still have some,
Does this Dragon look easy to cock ? For an Orangatang maybe !
Or this Tuned version of mine of the Gamo Supertarget , At 9 Fpe in .177 its hard work .
It has like all SSP,s a huge piston to enable it to create the swept volume for a single usable stroke to enable it to give it a decent output.
Not all of us are physically able to pump these, & If so for how many repetitions , This and the weight of them in my opinion was the demise of the SSP,
You cannot compare Pre-charged with these guns . ! They are the same, Recoilless , Super accurate , But SSP,s just have to weigh more ?
Had the same performance requirements been given to other designs , I am sure they could have been made more user friendly IE, Lighter weight, Less effort Etc.
First off a pump up, Pumped up in a reservoir needing a 1 pump top up per shot, Secondly a 2 pumped regulated output
( Ala the sharp innova )
And finally ( My favourite ) A Co2 gun, I can hear you muttering from here, Ha ha,
I meant a Reservoir precharged by a 12 Gram cylinder, This pressure was added to by a single pump , In a separate chamber, Again regulated by a simple Sharp type pressure regulater,
A given pressure regardless of temperature could be maintained .
Ged.
Last edited by gedfinn 2; 01-02-2015 at 12:19 PM.