Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: More hornet bullets.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,881
    I got that 3300fps with 12gn lil-gun in a Hornady K case & small rifle primer.

    This one is 10%+ better than the book velocity.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    I got that 3300fps with 12gn lil-gun in a Hornady K case & small rifle primer.

    This one is 10%+ better than the book velocity.
    That's 10% higher than the same combination but with 12.9 gr of lilgun out of same model rifle based on what I'm getting.
    Last edited by 223AI; 23-03-2015 at 06:21 AM.
    Thanks for looking

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,881
    Now got two boxes of Sierra 40gn 1200's on the way to my RFD which I'm looking forward to testing, I think I'll abandon further testing the Hornady 45gn until I've had a play with them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    Now got two boxes of Sierra 40gn 1200's on the way to my RFD which I'm looking forward to testing, I think I'll abandon further testing the Hornady 45gn until I've had a play with them.
    Let us know how you get on. Mine was better with the 45's than the 40's

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Eligus View Post
    Let us know how you get on. Mine was better with the 45's than the 40's
    Well I can already say that mine's as good with 40gn in .223" (Sierra 1100's) as I've managed with 45gn Hornady 2230, so the .224" (1200) should do even better.

    But it did "one hole cloverleaf" my last 3 factory 45gn Remington rounds at 50yds.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,881

    C.O.A.L consistency

    OK so I've got my Sierra 40gn SP's and just made up a selection of loads but I notice that on the vernier the coal is inconsistent

    Closely comparing the finished rounds I can see the problem is with the bullets, the lead tips are inconsistent in shape & size, so that a more pointed tip is being seated a fraction deeper than the more rounded.

    My Tester to set the die was spot on at 1.720", but the batch I've just done go from 1.731" down to 1.704" although the vast majority are 1.719-1.721"

    I doubt that's going to help the grouping much

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    OK so I've got my Sierra 40gn SP's and just made up a selection of loads but I notice that on the vernier the coal is inconsistent

    Closely comparing the finished rounds I can see the problem is with the bullets, the lead tips are inconsistent in shape & size, so that a more pointed tip is being seated a fraction deeper than the more rounded.

    My Tester to set the die was spot on at 1.720", but the batch I've just done go from 1.731" down to 1.704" although the vast majority are 1.719-1.721"

    I doubt that's going to help the grouping much
    I guess it depends on if hey are all consistent to the ogive which they may well be, one thing I noted when loading soft points is if you squeeze the vernier too hard you squash the point and shorten the COL anyway!
    Thanks for looking

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Amlwch, Anglesey, N Wales
    Posts
    254
    Just thought you'd like to know, when I put your recipe into Quickload, it shows that your shooting way above the maximum safe load.

    Cartridge : .22 Hornet(.224 groove=custom)
    Bullet : .224, 45, Sierra SP SemiSp 1300
    Useable Case Capaci: 11.820 grain H2O = 0.767 cm³
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 1.720 inch = 43.69 mm
    Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
    Powder : Hodgdon Lil'Gun

    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

    Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
    % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

    -20.0 86 9.76 2463 606 29357 3172 97.1 1.135
    -18.0 88 10.00 2520 634 31577 3233 97.9 1.104
    -16.0 91 10.25 2576 663 33985 3288 98.5 1.074
    -14.0 93 10.49 2632 692 36600 3336 99.1 1.045
    -12.0 95 10.74 2687 722 39446 3377 99.5 1.015 ! Near Maximum !
    -10.0 97 10.98 2742 751 42546 3411 99.8 0.986 ! Near Maximum !
    -08.0 99 11.22 2796 781 45927 3437 99.9 0.957 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    -06.0 101 11.47 2850 811 49608 3455 100.0 0.930 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    -04.0 104 11.71 2902 842 53585 3468 100.0 0.904 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    -02.0 106 11.96 2954 872 57916 3479 100.0 0.879 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +00.0 108 12.20 3006 903 62642 3490 100.0 0.855 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +02.0 110 12.44 3057 934 67812 3499 100.0 0.832 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +04.0 112 12.69 3107 965 73478 3506 100.0 0.809 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +06.0 114 12.93 3158 996 79705 3511 100.0 0.788 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +08.0 116 13.18 3208 1028 86567 3515 100.0 0.767 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    +10.0 119 13.42 3258 1060 94155 3517 100.0 0.747 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

    Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
    Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    +Ba 108 12.20 3098 959 77800 3309 100.0 0.802 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    -Ba 108 12.20 2859 817 48582 3703 99.0 0.931 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    314
    Wow - even more comfusion! It's a bit of a job when the bullet and powder manufacturers can't agree about load limits.
    When working up loads by steps I always check for signs of over pressure and have never encountered any.

    dickthomas - I'd be interested in seeing what Quickload says about Hornady V-Max in 35gr and 40gr with Lilgun.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    I'd be interested what quick load would make of hornady brass, 45gr Speer soft point, fed 205 primer and 11.5gr IMR 4831
    Last edited by 223AI; 04-04-2015 at 08:12 PM.
    Thanks for looking

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    314
    Boydy it would probably tell you your insurance was invalid !

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    I know but I'm dying to try it, my sensible side screams nooooooo
    Thanks for looking

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kirk Michael, Isle of Man
    Posts
    103
    Quickload says:
    1) You'll barely fit it in.
    2) It's too slow for hornet, half will burn after it exits the barrel.
    Won't hurt you though (unless you stick a bullet) so no harm in trying.
    Would need proposed OAL to give you precise predictions, it affects available case capacity.
    AYA SLE 12b, Harrier FAC air, Sako Finnfire .22

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Amlwch, Anglesey, N Wales
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by Boydy47 View Post
    I'd be interested what quick load would make of hornady brass, 45gr Speer soft point, fed 205 primer and 11.5gr IMR 4831

    Cartridge : .22 Hornet(.224 groove=custom)
    Bullet : .224, 45, Speer SP 1023
    Useable Case Capaci: 11.969 grain H2O = 0.777 cm³
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 1.720 inch = 43.69 mm
    Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
    Powder : IMR 4831

    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

    Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
    % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

    -20.0 87 9.20 1226 150 8053 825 27.5 2.148
    -18.0 89 9.43 1249 156 8382 861 28.1 2.109
    -16.0 91 9.66 1273 162 8732 898 28.6 2.071
    -14.0 94 9.89 1297 168 9104 936 29.2 2.033
    -12.0 96 10.12 1321 174 9503 976 29.8 1.996
    -10.0 98 10.35 1347 181 9927 1017 30.4 1.959
    -08.0 100 10.58 1372 188 10380 1059 31.0 1.922
    -06.0 102 10.81 1399 196 10864 1103 31.7 1.886
    -04.0 104 11.04 1426 203 11382 1149 32.3 1.849
    -02.0 107 11.27 1454 211 11937 1196 33.1 1.814
    +00.0 109 11.50 1482 219 12532 1245 33.8 1.778
    +02.0 111 11.73 1511 228 13170 1296 34.6 1.742
    +04.0 113 11.96 1541 237 13856 1348 35.4 1.707
    +06.0 115 12.19 1571 247 14595 1402 36.2 1.672
    +08.0 118 12.42 1603 257 15392 1459 37.0 1.637
    +10.0 120 12.65 1635 267 16253 1517 37.9 1.602

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by dickthomas View Post
    Cartridge : .22 Hornet(.224 groove=custom)
    Bullet : .224, 45, Speer SP 1023
    Useable Case Capaci: 11.969 grain H2O = 0.777 cm³
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 1.720 inch = 43.69 mm
    Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
    Powder : IMR 4831

    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

    Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
    % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

    -20.0 87 9.20 1226 150 8053 825 27.5 2.148
    -18.0 89 9.43 1249 156 8382 861 28.1 2.109
    -16.0 91 9.66 1273 162 8732 898 28.6 2.071
    -14.0 94 9.89 1297 168 9104 936 29.2 2.033
    -12.0 96 10.12 1321 174 9503 976 29.8 1.996
    -10.0 98 10.35 1347 181 9927 1017 30.4 1.959
    -08.0 100 10.58 1372 188 10380 1059 31.0 1.922
    -06.0 102 10.81 1399 196 10864 1103 31.7 1.886
    -04.0 104 11.04 1426 203 11382 1149 32.3 1.849
    -02.0 107 11.27 1454 211 11937 1196 33.1 1.814
    +00.0 109 11.50 1482 219 12532 1245 33.8 1.778
    +02.0 111 11.73 1511 228 13170 1296 34.6 1.742
    +04.0 113 11.96 1541 237 13856 1348 35.4 1.707
    +06.0 115 12.19 1571 247 14595 1402 36.2 1.672
    +08.0 118 12.42 1603 257 15392 1459 37.0 1.637
    +10.0 120 12.65 1635 267 16253 1517 37.9 1.602
    Lovely job, thanks very much
    Thanks for looking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •