Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ruger Old Army Front Sight

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240

    Ruger Old Army Front Sight

    Anyone know where I can get a Ruger Old Army front sight blade?
    I've searched the internet.. but only one I can find is MidwayUSA and that is discontinued.

    Mark

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by bfhb View Post
    Anyone know where I can get a Ruger Old Army front sight blade?
    I've searched the internet.. but only one I can find is MidwayUSA and that is discontinued.

    Mark
    I'm over there in a few weeks time - so I'll see will I find one, or two, or more. Is YOUR ROA fitted with a pinned or otherwise fixed sight? My older model [1886 vintage] has a roll pin. Also is your ROA stainless or blued?

    tac

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Oldham
    Posts
    84
    Tac - could you 'stock up' on some front sight blades - and most especially the taller ones for correct POI with heaver conicals ? I use 220 and 285 grain heeled-base WFN 'conicals' (really good hunting boolits where allowed) and they shoot way high at 25 yards.

    I'd buy 2 taller sights and a regular one from you, and a pint for yer troubles...
    The Black-Powder Revival gathers steam..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    I'm over there in a few weeks time - so I'll see will I find one, or two, or more. Is YOUR ROA fitted with a pinned or otherwise fixed sight? My older model [1886 vintage] has a roll pin. Also is your ROA stainless or blued?

    tac
    It is a stainless with roll pin. The sight blade is blued.
    From picture in the link below, you can see that someone has modified it with a file to just a post at one end. I managed to hit it with a hammer and block of wood whilst slugging the barrel!

    I may be trying conicals soon too. Do you really need a taller blade or will the rear sight adjust enough?

    Mark

    http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a21...psbknixbml.jpg

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Tac,

    Would these be from the same company that does the "correctly" priced ROA nipples?

    Mark

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    There is only one taller front sight element, and it's made by Ruger, sadly. I'll see what I can find but don't be holding your breath.

    I'm intrigued as to why anybody would need to slug the barrel of a ROA. I've only been shooting mine since 1986, and I know a lot of other folks who shot them for fun and food but I've never heard of anybody using anything except a .457" diameter bullet or ball, 'cos that's what they shoot.

    As for adjusting the backsight, I figure that if the front one isn't tall enough, then the backsight has long run out of adjustment, hence the request for a taller one.

    And yes, heavier bullets will shoot higher - it's all to do with the physics of the recoil sequence, and where the muzzle is pointing when the bullet leave it.

    tac

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Oldham
    Posts
    84
    Ruger themselves say 457 for Round Ball, 454 for any other types of projectile. Can't recall where I read it, but I did...
    The Black-Powder Revival gathers steam..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnBall View Post
    Ruger themselves say 457 for Round Ball, 454 for any other types of projectile. Can't recall where I read it, but I did...
    It says it in the ROA manual.

    Mark

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    You got a manual?

    Oy.

    I got a black and yellow cardboard box with a revolver in it.

    tac

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    You got a manual?
    tac
    I downloaded the manual from the Ruger website.

    Mark

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Anglesey
    Posts
    329
    I was alwYs told 454 for relieving pressure loads, but that's usually different ignition and powder etc. none the less been that it to 😜

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •