Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Benjamin 422 Semi-Auto Co2 Pistol

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    3,326

    Benjamin 422 Semi-Auto Co2 Pistol

    Although primarily a spring air pistol enthusiast, I added a Crosman 600 semi-auto Co2 pistol to my collection about a year ago and haven’t been able to put it down since. If it’s sheer fun rather than anything more serious you want, this pistol certainly ticks all the boxes.

    A little research revealed that Benjamin also attempted to provide some competition for the 600 with their own semi-automatic .22, CO2 pistol designated the model 422 which was produced for a very short time (1969-1973). There was a very good reason for this short production period as the pistol has often been described as a “warranty nightmare” by those who are know a lot more about these things than me. The 422 was apparently prone to miss feeds and burst fire consequently making it a bit of a failure as a reliable semi-auto.

    I have always been a sucker for quirky pistols though and finally weakened sufficiently to buy a nice example (pictured below) at the last Bisley, Phoenix meeting. I entered into this with my eyes wide open and consequently went for a boxed pistol complete with original accessories as it was likely to end up more as a static collectable rather than a regular shooter.

    For those unfamiliar with this design, the 422 uses an 8 grm CO2 capsule which is inserted and pierced from the front using the cylinder cap just like the first model Crosman 600. Things get a little bit weird from here on though as once the cocking lever is pulled back, a spring assisted magazine follower situated on the right side of the frame is pulled back and rested on the end cap. Up to 10 pellets can now be inserted into the magazine which is directly behind and in-line with the barrel before carefully resting the follower behind the pellets. Looking through the unloaded magazine / barrel, you can just make out the 3 O rings which hold the pellets in place until each is released with subsequent operations of the trigger.The pistol is fitted with a trigger safety which should obviously be applied during the above procedure and also uses the cocking lever as a hammer safety when placed in the detent at the rear of its slot.

    To give the pistol the best chance of success, I initially used 15 of the original Benjamin HC pellets which were cleaned to remove the oxidisation and lubricated. I then acquired some Milbro Caledonian and Marksman No2 pellets which I was told might also stand a chance of feeding correctly.
    I decided to load just 5 pellets each time thus avoiding the temptation to empty the magazine too quickly. Much to my surprise, all of the Benjamin pellets exited the barrel individually and grouped to within 2 “ at 10 metres even when fired rapidly. More pleasingly, both alternative brands also cycled faultlessly and grouped in a similar position to the HCs. Finally, I put a number of shots through the Chrono which recorded an average muzzle velocity of 343 ft/sec and consequent muzzle energy of 3.6 ft’/lbs with a 14 grn pellet.

    I don’t expect this sort of reliability to continue once the O rings start to wear, but as the pistol won’t be used as often as the Crosman 600, this shouldn’t really present too much of a problem. I must admit that I personally find the 422 a cooler looking pistol than the 600, but as far as reliability is concerned, only time will tell.

    http://i1362.photobucket.com/albums/...psknsw0pyx.jpg

    http://i1362.photobucket.com/albums/...psbvggpyb5.jpg

    http://i1362.photobucket.com/albums/...psjloezzry.jpg

    http://i1362.photobucket.com/albums/...psjloezzry.jpg

    http://i1362.photobucket.com/albums/...psdsrm330b.jpg

    Regards

    Brian

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    324
    What a fantastic find, can see it's a Benjamin and it does look smoother and slicker than the 600. Is that original condition as looks immaculate

    Have 600 myself and they are great

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Tonbridge Kent
    Posts
    2,885
    Brian \ Baz

    Seriously ! - have you been out in the sun too long today!

    A 422 versus a 600 as a looker - its like comparing Ena Sharples to Kim Basinger

    Go take a lie down

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark D View Post
    Brian \ Baz

    Seriously ! - have you been out in the sun too long today!

    A 422 versus a 600 as a looker - its like comparing Ena Sharples to Kim Basinger

    Go take a lie down
    Hi Mark,

    Beauty as they say is in the eyes of the beholder. I doubt the 422 will ever replace the 600 in my affections, but it's lines certainly remind me more of the .22 LR semi-autos I used to shoot before the 1995 pistol ban.

    Regards

    Brian

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,593

    Thanks for that

    I'd never heard of the 422 until you mentioned it on here the other day. Which set me googling.

    I do like the way it looks like a normal CO2 piatol, rather than the "ray gun" style of the 600.

    And, as a PH Dragon owner (and former Saxby-Palmer Elite/Royale owner), I have always been oddly drawn to guns that in principle are brilliant but in practice aren't.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    725

    Caution: Wear eye protection when shooting a 422!!!!!!

    Yes, the 422 can spit out pellets in just the way intended. However, from personal experience, it can also spit out debris from the breach. Making the wearing of eye protection is, of course, always a good idea anyways, but, with the 422 it is essential.

    All of the later Benjamin designs came from the same person, Ray Katt, president/owner of Benjamin. From the very first, it was the tradition at Benjamin for ownership to be responsible for all engineering and design. Unlike at Crosman, there was never a professional engineer engaged. The result being designs like the 422 that just are not of the same design quality seen in the Crosman line.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •