Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 84

Thread: I'm really starting to think that these 21/22mm bores with their longer strokes...

  1. #46
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Truro
    Posts
    4,398
    Probably a good thing that it is so detectable as it saves more messing around.

    From your list the 24mm looks to be interesting - would be intrigued to see how it performs in .177.
    People who have been there focus on the fundamentals. People who sit at keyboards all day focus on the trivial and inane.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,448
    Quote Originally Posted by rockdrill View Post
    Probably a good thing that it is so detectable as it saves more messing around.

    From your list the 24mm looks to be interesting - would be intrigued to see how it performs in .177.
    You coming to the bash ?

    In .20 with an 11" barrel it makes 12FP easy - a little too easy - with 85mm stroke. It's an HW80 so barrel swaps are easy Even as is (detuned to 11), with a straight swap for a 14" .177 barrel I'd expect it to also make 10.5 - 11 And if it needs more, an extra 2-3mm preload will bring it up over 11 easy.

    The 80's port is around 11mm long, so would be even more efficient in a TX / 97 / 77

    Rgds - JB
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Truro
    Posts
    4,398
    Unfortunately not - I would like to get along to one of these but they always seem to fall at awkward times for me.
    People who have been there focus on the fundamentals. People who sit at keyboards all day focus on the trivial and inane.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post

    Maybe I need to try 23.5 ?
    Do it!
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,211
    Quote Originally Posted by Snooper601 View Post
    Congratulations to Jim on another excellent article in the latest AGW, including this very subject.

    Also to Tony on his boinger article in the same issue.

    Boingers are the new cool airguns.

    Cheers

    John
    Thank you, John. Praise from someone with an engineering background is praise indeed.

    Good to see Tony singing the praises of the springer. Hopefully, his enthusiasm will prove as infectious as it is unbounded, and PCP users will be inspired to add a springer to their airgun collection.

  6. #51
    Snooper601 is offline I likes to polish my trophy
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dunstable, Beds
    Posts
    5,761
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    Thank you, John. Praise from someone with an engineering background is praise indeed.

    Good to see Tony singing the praises of the springer. Hopefully, his enthusiasm will prove as infectious as it is unbounded, and PCP users will be inspired to add a springer to their airgun collection.
    Your welcome Jim, your articles are just what we need to keep the general airguning population aware that things can and will be improved over the bog standard 'as purchased' airguns.

    What's your take on the o-ring seals being more prone to dieseling compared to parachute seals?

    Cheers

    John
    Snooper601 Suspect a simple fault, or a simple engineer He who dies with the most toys wins!
    QHAC Official lubricant development engineer.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,211
    Quote Originally Posted by Snooper601 View Post
    Your welcome Jim, your articles are just what we need to keep the general airguning population aware that things can and will be improved over the bog standard 'as purchased' airguns.

    What's your take on the o-ring seals being more prone to dieseling compared to parachute seals?

    Cheers

    John
    To be honest, John, without testing pistons fitted with o ring seals, I can't say for sure, and I'm loathe to speculate.

  8. #53
    Snooper601 is offline I likes to polish my trophy
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dunstable, Beds
    Posts
    5,761
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    To be honest, John, without testing pistons fitted with o ring seals, I can't say for sure, and I'm loathe to speculate.
    I can see an article coming where TX type seals are compared to HW style and o-ring types to see which might be best for various requirements, accuracy, power, efficiency, consistency, hold sensitivity, propensity to diesel and shot cycle.

    Cheers

    John
    Snooper601 Suspect a simple fault, or a simple engineer He who dies with the most toys wins!
    QHAC Official lubricant development engineer.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Nuneaton
    Posts
    340
    Dont know the wieght of these small bore pistons but what about making a deadblow piston/piston rod?

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Snooper601 View Post
    Congratulations to Jim on another excellent article in the latest AGW, including this very subject.


    Cheers

    John
    Got it today!

    And, I must say, this has got to be one of the most, if not THE MOST, bestest articles ever on springer tuning, even going by Jim's consistently high standards and supreme knowledge.

    An absolute classic, thanks, Jim.

    And for anyone vaguely interested in springer dynamics, an absolute must read.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    1,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Gecko View Post
    Dont know the wieght of these small bore pistons but what about making a deadblow piston/piston rod?
    My full bodied 22mm piston is 152grams with t hat..

  12. #57
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near Dumfries
    Posts
    1,457
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    I forgot how far "north" you are - I can recommend a decent B&B very closeby if you want top ensure a decent night's rest with all that travelling...
    Hi Jon

    Thanks for that but I would stay with friends in Kettering if I came down just to split up the journey. Problem is fully booked Saturday and the other guys I want to talk with would only be there on Saturday!

    Maybe next time I can get up to speed earlier!

    atvb
    David
    May today be the best day of your life and all your tomorrows even better!!

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,448
    Quote Originally Posted by prosport.177 View Post
    My full bodied 22mm piston is 152grams with t hat..
    My 22mm bodiless is about the same...
    the 23mm (body) is around 170
    the 24 is around 180
    25s are around 200
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    Agreed, although I'm slightly surprised that's it's so "detectable" within a fairly small variation of those parameters;
    - 26mm OK (slightly hold sensitive) and a little too much recoil / surge
    - 25mm good but can be a little "aggressive"
    - 24mm very good and quite soft
    - 23mm very good and soft
    - 22mm OK (slightly hold sensitive) and very soft
    Have you compared any of these to going down the more conventional route of short stroking an 80? Limiting hold sentitivity and consistancy would be the goal. My Mk3 TX seems much more stable on firing with a Tinbum short stroke head extension.
    Walther LGV Competition Ultra .177 Walther LGU .177
    HW97KT Synthetic Venom Lazaglide + SFS tweaks .177 HW77KT SFS Stage 2 .177
    TX200 MK3 V-Mach + Tinbum Shortstroke .177 HW97K V-Glide .177

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,090
    Quote Originally Posted by ART1969 View Post
    Have you compared any of these to going down the more conventional route of short stroking an 80? Limiting hold sentitivity and consistancy would be the goal. My Mk3 TX seems much more stable on firing with a Tinbum short stroke head extension.
    At the very first Boinger Bash, Wonky Donky brought along a short stroke '80. I seem to recall that the stroke was 55mm and I also seem to think it had a lightened piston; don't think it was running piston bearings.

    It shot beautifully!

    Barely distinguishable from a 25mm sleeved one.. ----- Obviously just going on perceived feel here, it would need a rig such as discussed above to measure for sure.

    So, assuming for a second that it yielded similar results, the short stroke and standard bore would entail far less work.

    But we love it when these shed tuner techies play around!
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •