Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Chrono results question.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northwich, Cheshire.
    Posts
    145

    Question Chrono results question.

    I've got some results for my first test of home loads. My 7.62 results max 2806 fps min 2608 avg 2725 And .223 max 2377 min 2200 avg 2325. 10 rounds each trial. Is this spread reasonable? Regards jj

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    945
    JJ - unless your chronograph is suspect, I would say around a 200 fps spread on both calibres is not good. People using a chronograph are usually looking for a spread of no more than 40 fps. It could of course be that just one round was low and one high - if you were to deduct the lowest and the highest then divide by 8 how dramatically would that effect spread. Bear in mind the SD (standard deviation) is the all important figure.

    For normal live quarry out to say 200 yds your figures are not too concerning, however at extended ranges I would predict accuracy will fall off.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northwich, Cheshire.
    Posts
    145
    Hmm. I thought they looked a bit wide. The 7.62 session showed a sd of 82.5. It's the only one I recorded as I was going to research what it meant. Is it an indication of quality? Thank you for your comments. I'm New to reloading and find it totally absorbing. JJ

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    What are your loads, and what bullets are you using? Are all the cases the same in each calibre? Is there any particular reason why your .223 is so low to begin with? Most .223 hovers around 3000fps and up. Are these long-range target loads or for backyard plinking?

    Information is pretty thin on the ground here.

    tac

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,774
    First thing I'd say is put a dozen factory rounds through it & see how they compare, you might be surprised.

    Don't get hung up on the ES or SD purely as numbers, only as a % of the average,

    for your 7.62
    ave 2725fps - max fps is +2.9%, min fps -4.2%, SD is 3% looks a bit better in those terms doesn't it .

  6. #6
    Randy Bohannon's Avatar
    Randy Bohannon is offline “Junes1 is a whining bellend”
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    28,522
    The ES and SD numbers are certainly plausible, if that is the question.

    the last box of privi 243 ammo I chrono'd showed similar numbers.

    getting the ES down is primarily a function of powder choice and how consistently that powder is ignited.

    having said that for under 300 yards ES is not very important
    "An infinite number of monkeys banging away at type writers for an infinite period of time will eventually reproduce Hamlet" Thanks to discussion forums we now know this to be untrue.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    York
    Posts
    2,544
    Depends on useable. If your target shooting and want to take it seriously then they are wholely unacceptable.... If they are for 200 and in hunting your fine.
    My target loads have an es of 18 and an SD of 8 from memory

  8. #8
    Randy Bohannon's Avatar
    Randy Bohannon is offline “Junes1 is a whining bellend”
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    28,522
    Quote Originally Posted by dannywayoflife View Post
    Depends on useable. If your target shooting and want to take it seriously then they are wholely unacceptable.... If they are for 200 and in hunting your fine.
    My target loads have an es of 18 and an SD of 8 from memory
    Fair enough Danny, the lower the better but a velocity difference of 100 fps, assuming adjusted zeros, leads to a difference in drop of around an inch at 300 yards.

    Ok, not great for bench rest or F class but hunting and on a NRA target it doesn't seem to make too much difference.
    "An infinite number of monkeys banging away at type writers for an infinite period of time will eventually reproduce Hamlet" Thanks to discussion forums we now know this to be untrue.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    York
    Posts
    2,544
    If you were shooting seriously at targets would you accept that mate?? I know I wouldn't!

    However regarding the rather large es and SD from the OP, what kind of chrono did you use? As that's a very large difference.

  10. #10
    Randy Bohannon's Avatar
    Randy Bohannon is offline “Junes1 is a whining bellend”
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    28,522
    Quote Originally Posted by dannywayoflife View Post
    If you were shooting seriously at targets would you accept that mate?? I know I wouldn't!

    However regarding the rather large es and SD from the OP, what kind of chrono did you use? As that's a very large difference.

    Absolutely and to be fair I wouldn't accept that for hunting ammo Danny but for hunting I would be ok with it.
    "An infinite number of monkeys banging away at type writers for an infinite period of time will eventually reproduce Hamlet" Thanks to discussion forums we now know this to be untrue.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Hertford
    Posts
    1,522
    So how do they shoot on paper? Do they group nicely?

    If they do, does any of this matter?
    Good deals with: Muskett, Dreben, roger.kerry, TALL, Helidave1, Chelseablue, Leeroy7031, Mousemann, pnuk, Practical, NEWFI, HOOGS, Webb22, lazybones1416 and deanw5262 among others. Thanks Guys.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    York
    Posts
    2,544
    Quote Originally Posted by sarge4318 View Post
    So how do they shoot on paper? Do they group nicely?

    If they do, does any of this matter?
    At short range no it wouldn't matter but past a few hundred yards on small targets yes it will matter

  13. #13
    Elwood is offline Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean to say they aren't trying to get me.
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chichester
    Posts
    3,073
    My guess is that they were put over the chronograph from a clean barrel? if so this can increase your ES and SD by twice the amount.

    Fire two shots to foul the barrel before trying to get any useful data on group size or chronograph figures.
    God has a hard on for green rifles

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Hertford
    Posts
    1,522
    Quote Originally Posted by dannywayoflife View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sarge4318 View Post
    So how do they shoot on paper? Do they group nicely?

    If they do, does any of this matter?
    At short range no it wouldn't matter but past a few hundred yards on small targets yes it will matter
    What I was trying to get at was do they group at the distance(s) you want to shoot them at?
    If they do what you want, at the distances you want, does it matter what the ES, SD or MV is?

    I have seen it many time where a shooter will try to reduce the ES or SD to the smallest possible even though they were hitting the bull every time just because they believed that a good round had to have the smallest ES, SD etc. or their mate was getting a much higher MV than they were getting so they tried to fix something that wasn't broken.
    Last edited by sarge4318; 26-04-2016 at 04:31 PM.
    Good deals with: Muskett, Dreben, roger.kerry, TALL, Helidave1, Chelseablue, Leeroy7031, Mousemann, pnuk, Practical, NEWFI, HOOGS, Webb22, lazybones1416 and deanw5262 among others. Thanks Guys.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •