Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: New arrival a FWB 65 pistol

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    698
    That's an interesting barrel shroud - is it specific to a Beeman model?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by trick cyclist View Post
    That's an interesting barrel shroud - is it specific to a Beeman model?
    I don't think so, but I don't think Beeman had them put in many of their packages. This gun's serial number is just over 100,000 it would be a 1978? The postmark on the Beeman box is January of 1979. I don't think many were with the long tang guns. I love the look of it cause the long thin barrel gives it a pencil look without it. They did make a heavier barrel as well. I have been looking for a while and I have never seen a Beeman with a shroud weight for sale or even in a picture. Whether this gun needs more weight is another question. Only had it for a day will be fun experimenting. One downside already. The shroud would have to be removed to attach the clip to stop the recoil less action, but doubt I would want the recoil?
    Last edited by 45flint; 30-06-2016 at 12:18 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Notts.
    Posts
    4,217

    Fwb

    I think when they say no lube it refers to the internals. I would lightly lube the external linkages.
    Did you know that if the recoil less plate is fitted the recoil matches a .22 rimfire target pistol for cheaper practice.
    When I die don't let my wife sell my guns for what she thinks I gave for them!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Blackburn, Lancs. (under a bridge)
    Posts
    22,944
    I am a fan of the FWB spring pistols. http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Airs...l?sort=6&o=125

    From the classic 65 to the odd ball 90.
    Founder & ex secretary of Rivington Riflemen.
    www.rivington-riflemen.uk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bath, innit?
    Posts
    6,700
    good catch, I have never seen that shroud before.

    These are Rolls Royce pistols. Or I suppose that should be Maybach. You have to admire the engineering and quality

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pendlebury, Greater Manchester
    Posts
    2,640
    Does the shroud preclude the fitting of weights?

    Did the 65 accept weights? I don't actually know having owned only a Mod. 80.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Inspector 71 View Post
    Does the shroud preclude the fitting of weights?

    Did the 65 accept weights? I don't actually know having owned only a Mod. 80.
    The shroud was the weight for the 65. There was a after market weight system that screwed in the hole for the recoil shield. FWB came out with the better weight system on the 80.

    Here are closer pics.
    http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...smrknwlez.jpeg

    http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...sd8gs9geb.jpeg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •