Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 162

Thread: Jim's piston seal article in AGW...

  1. #106
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    coventry
    Posts
    1,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    interesting... how does it shoot ?
    Not had it in a gun , just wanted to see if I could machine it, its worth a go though.

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Glasgow Harbour
    Posts
    837
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    Should do, there's not that much - think of a tight old BSA airsporter o-ring piston head.

    But I agree on your priorities... this is just the testing phase
    This post and apost 86 are very close to what may in my mind solve some issues.

    The long head of the piston seal absorbs energy,,,,,,,as it compresses and tightens up in the comp tube in the reverse stroke also,,,,,,,,not going in to the Airsporter comp tube bleed hole underneath with what it can do to release pressure also.

    My Mk3 Airpsorter and all standard internals is very mild to shoot, compared to tuned modern guns it has no hold sensitivity or recoil issues.

    Sometimes overthinking and over engineering and theories complicate simple physics. But without this then we wouldn't love airguns.
    Nice things happen to nice people.

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    coventry
    Posts
    1,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Clanchief View Post
    This post and apost 86 are very close to what may in my mind solve some issues.

    The long head of the piston seal absorbs energy,,,,,,,as it compresses and tightens up in the comp tube in the reverse stroke also,,,,,,,,not going in to the Airsporter comp tube bleed hole underneath with what it can do to release pressure also.

    My Mk3 Airpsorter and all standard internals is very mild to shoot, compared to tuned modern guns it has no hold sensitivity or recoil issues.

    Sometimes overthinking and over engineering and theories complicate simple physics. But without this then we wouldn't love airguns.
    I bet your airsporter is a .22 ?

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Northampton.
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by Rooti McNote View Post
    I guess, keeping the volume low-ish through a valve (compared to a regular TP) would be a challenge?
    But maybe it's not as critical IF the valve works. Trapping that energy the pellet side of the valve has got to mean you need less input energy in the first place. Avoid piston crash, yes, but I'm not sure you need the same peak pressures and I'm not sold on minimum transfer port volumes, better to chase dead volumes in lip seals....

    BMP01
    Last edited by bmp01; 23-09-2016 at 10:57 PM.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    loughborough
    Posts
    840

    Piston bounce

    I think the piston will reverse faster than the seal due to the drag of the seal and greater mass of the piston.

    Another thought is if the piston skirt is pinned to the head in slots this will allow the skirt to act as a inertia weight.

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    loughborough
    Posts
    840

    Check valve

    I think that a valve will increase bounce as it will restrict the air flow and sap energy opening the valve.

    This is the problem in the first place in that the transfer port or valve constricts the air flow and the air
    has a finite speed.

  7. #112
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,451
    Quote Originally Posted by crowbar View Post
    I think the piston will reverse faster than the seal due to the drag of the seal and greater mass of the piston.

    Another thought is if the piston skirt is pinned to the head in slots this will allow the skirt to act as a inertia weight.
    the piston only reverses because it is being pushed back by air excerting a force on the seal, so I doubt it...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  8. #113
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,451
    Quote Originally Posted by crowbar View Post
    I think that a valve will increase bounce as it will restrict the air flow and sap energy opening the valve.

    This is the problem in the first place in that the transfer port or valve constricts the air flow and the air
    has a finite speed.
    agree, hence I am working a design of check valve that does not restrict airflow at all
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  9. #114
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Clanchief View Post
    This post and apost 86 are very close to what may in my mind solve some issues.

    The long head of the piston seal absorbs energy,,,,,,,

    Sometimes overthinking and over engineering and theories complicate simple physics. But without this then we wouldn't love airguns.
    I'd mentioned the possibility of a compressible head (maybe sprung - steel or air) a little while ago on a thread. So that, when the piston reaches the point where the air pressure ahead of it would normally cause it to bounce, only the sprung head moves backwards and not the main piston, reducing / negating surge. As is often the case, it's all been done before and Mick, T20, pointed out that Wonky had played / posted on such an arrangement.

    Sometimes (and not wanting to stifle or hold back any advances here) I think it's just nicer to accept some of the limitations and idiosyncrasies of the humble springer. Get the BALANCE right....transfer port dimensions, bore, stroke, piston weight, spring force and, of course, matching that pellet to the powerplant. On many rifles it'll be the transfer port that will be the most difficult to play with - especially the length on guns without sliding comp tubes. As mentioned higher up, we have the choking effect to consider and also, as Jim recently pointed out, the pulse factor, too.

    BOING!
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  10. #115
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    loughborough
    Posts
    840

    Valve

    For a valve to not restrict the air flow it would need to be fully open from the start of the pistons release and close when
    peak pressure is reached in front valve.

  11. #116
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    loughborough
    Posts
    840

    Piston seal

    The air pressure will act on the piston as a whole unit but the piston body and head have a certain amount of
    movement between themselves and the greater mass of the piston body will control this movement.

  12. #117
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    coventry
    Posts
    1,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    agree, hence I am working a design of check valve that does not restrict airflow at all
    Reed Valve ?

  13. #118
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,451
    Quote Originally Posted by crowbar View Post
    The air pressure will act on the piston as a whole unit but the piston body and head have a certain amount of
    movement between themselves and the greater mass of the piston body will control this movement.
    I disagree - the pressure acts on the piston through the seal.

    Quote Originally Posted by crowbar View Post
    For a valve to not restrict the air flow it would need to be fully open from the start of the pistons release and close when
    peak pressure is reached in front valve.
    It would need to open fairly early on, but not necesarily from the outset. You defo don't want it to be shut when peak pressure is reached, just when the pressure differential accross the valve become negative..

    Quote Originally Posted by NickG View Post
    Reed Valve ?
    Crossed my mind, but I don't think there's space without compromising length / lost volume ?

    I think it's time I built what I'm thinking
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  14. #119
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saxmundham
    Posts
    1,508
    Some time ago I saw a photo of one of Gerald Cardews W&S Hawks that he used for development work. It was one he had been using to test anti-bounce piston devices. It still worked fine. The Hawk is owned by John Bowkett. As many know I am involved in his facebook fanpage. I will see if I can get permission to put a pic of it either here or over there if anyone is interested?

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    wimborne
    Posts
    864
    I know there's no 'one size fits all' answer but where abouts in the stroke would you expect a 25 mm piston to bounce ? ....1-2 mm from the end ? more ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •