Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Today's Load Testing - Vhit 135

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Gone West Young Man
    Posts
    20,266
    I'm sure this is a daft question but you are cleaning the rifle thoroughly after each session (not group) and not just using a pull through or some such?

    Are you using the rifle for target or foxes? If foxes then all those shot today will kill it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by bullbarrel View Post
    I'm sure this is a daft question but you are cleaning the rifle thoroughly after each session (not group) and not just using a pull through or some such?

    Are you using the rifle for target or foxes? If foxes then all those shot today will kill it.
    Yeah, it always gets a proper clean with solvent and patches after every session. The rifle is used mainly for longer range vermin bashing and long range plinking

    .22LR CZ452; .22 Hornet CZ527
    Tikka T3 Varmint .223; .204 Ruger CZ527 Varmint;
    6.5 Creed Bergara B14 HMR

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    975
    might be a daft question but if you have used the n133 with success, why switch to another powder.....ive just done my 53`s with n133. >HERE<
    Without curiosity, evolution would have been greatly flawed.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by enigma View Post
    might be a daft question but if you have used the n133 with success, why switch to another powder.....ive just done my 53`s with n133. >HERE<
    http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....Quickload-Help

    First post.....
    Thanks for looking

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by enigma View Post
    might be a daft question but if you have used the n133 with success, why switch to another powder.....ive just done my 53`s with n133. >HERE<
    Nice group and you must be nearing max pressure with that load. Only switched because they didn't have any in stock and there was a 1kg tub on offer for £50. Thought it was worth a punt!

    .22LR CZ452; .22 Hornet CZ527
    Tikka T3 Varmint .223; .204 Ruger CZ527 Varmint;
    6.5 Creed Bergara B14 HMR

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    2,248
    Here's the video clip of the COAL test using 25.1gr of Vhit 135: https://youtu.be/vYOVOsrZikA

    .22LR CZ452; .22 Hornet CZ527
    Tikka T3 Varmint .223; .204 Ruger CZ527 Varmint;
    6.5 Creed Bergara B14 HMR

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by Elliott View Post
    Nice group and you must be nearing max pressure with that load. Only switched because they didn't have any in stock and there was a 1kg tub on offer for £50. Thought it was worth a punt!
    I had no pressure signs at the time but wondered later when it gets warmer it might push it to top. I could always try extending the COAL this would reduce pressure and might tighten it up..(grouping that is)
    Without curiosity, evolution would have been greatly flawed.....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by enigma View Post
    I had no pressure signs at the time but wondered later when it gets warmer it might push it to top. I could always try extending the COAL this would reduce pressure and might tighten it up..(grouping that is)
    Vhit 135 is apparently lower pressure at the same velocity. Might be worth considering

    .22LR CZ452; .22 Hornet CZ527
    Tikka T3 Varmint .223; .204 Ruger CZ527 Varmint;
    6.5 Creed Bergara B14 HMR

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by Elliott View Post
    Vhit 135 is apparently lower pressure at the same velocity. Might be worth considering
    Pity you wasn't closer I could have swapped you some and tested it..
    Without curiosity, evolution would have been greatly flawed.....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    161
    Have you tried vit 140, I use it in .223 and get very tight groups, it also meters very well

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by neutron_bomb View Post
    Have you tried vit 140, I use it in .223 and get very tight groups, it also meters very well
    No I haven't, to be honest I was reluctant to try Vhit 135 having found a good load with 133. Sometimes you can play about far too much! Nice to know that other powders work though and have a few recipes to hand

    .22LR CZ452; .22 Hornet CZ527
    Tikka T3 Varmint .223; .204 Ruger CZ527 Varmint;
    6.5 Creed Bergara B14 HMR

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    161
    For what its worth my best 5 shot group at 50 metres was 0.22 inches that was using 24.0 gn of vit140 behind a 69 gn sierra match king.
    I have had similar results with cfe 223 same load and head.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Daventry. Northants.
    Posts
    3,534
    Like Varget Vit 140 is an excellent powder in mid size cases with similar capacities to 308, it has its uses in smaller capacity cases where the bullet weight is approaching the upper limit for the cartridge but there are better suited burning rate powders for the 223, Vit 133 being one of the best.

    TB.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    For bullets under 55 gr n140 is a bit slow, though kenny gets good results with it and 55s. When you make it down for a shoot with the club I can give a bit of N140 to try for curiosity's Sake.

    Mind you I use 39 gr under a 100 gr a-max in a 6.5 x 55 case that will hold 50 gr of N160, (n140 is really too fast for this cartridge) terrible case fill but still shoots 1/2-3/4" at 100. Could probably tighten that up a bit by playing with COAL but as this is a short to mid range target load (<600 yards) that's good enough for me
    Thanks for looking

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    161
    I dont disagree with you and I did specify 69 gn head, it may be less consitent with a lighter head, however my rem 700 has 1 in 9 twist and seems to prefer the 69 gn. It does not group well with 55 gn heads.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •