I would rather this didn't turn into an Airsporter v Mk3 thread. Airgunners have been having that debate since 1948. Could we all agree that they are both rather lovely and special, and equally important parts of the history of British airguns?

I still can't believe (see John M's piece in a recent AGW) how much skilled handwork must have been involved in making the Mk3. I wonder if Webley actually recouped their production costs at sale.