Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: Colt 1911 vs Colt SAA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Stoke
    Posts
    10,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur John Smithsplease View Post
    Which of the two is likely to be prove more robust over time?

    My guess would be the revolver because it has no moving slide to wear things out.

    However, I wonder how the crane and cylinder, and the more complex trigger mechanism might stand up to repeated use.

    The SAA certainly looks pretty sturdy. But it's still constructed from pot metal.

    How well do you think it will last?
    It has a crane? I thought only swing-out cylinders used those.

    In any case, it's probably the ratchet/pawl and cylinder bolt that'll wear - what're they made of?
    ...history... is, indeed, little more than the register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind. (Edward Gibbon: Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire)

  2. #2
    eyebull's Avatar
    eyebull is offline Even a stopped clock is right twice a day
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Borehamwood
    Posts
    6,769
    Quote Originally Posted by MikB View Post
    In any case, it's probably the ratchet/pawl and cylinder bolt that'll wear - what're they made of?

    Almost certainly cheap cast alloy.
    Good deals with these members

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    16,435
    Quote Originally Posted by MikB View Post
    It has a crane? I thought only swing-out cylinders used those.

    In any case, it's probably the ratchet/pawl and cylinder bolt that'll wear - what're they made of?
    You're right Mik. My mistake.

    I was thinking of modern revolvers.

    Thanks to everybody for your replies.
    Arthur

    I wish I was in the land of cotton.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •