Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: Over-Scoping Air Rifles

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    7,674

    Over-Scoping Air Rifles

    What is the best size scope for a sub12 ft.lbs Air Rifle?
    4X32, 6X42, 8X56, 10X42 or any one of the zooms available from 1.5X6X24 to 10X50X60?
    Surely for an Air rifle it is the reticule that is important rather than a large zoom range.
    Are we all guilty of overscoping our Air Rifles?


    A.G

  2. #2
    Jesim1's Avatar
    Jesim1 is offline Likes to wear driving gloves in the bedroom
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    4,939
    Possibly, but it depends on what your using it for, how your eyes are, and basically what you prefer. I mostly target shoot, so high mags for small targets at long ranges mostly from a bench all make sense, but I would not want a 50 mag that weights over a kilo being trolled round a permission? A 4-16x44 would be my choice for that.

    James
    Making a mockery of growing old gracefully since I retired

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Scunthorpe
    Posts
    284

    2-7 x 32

    decent 2-7 x 32 is perfect
    big field of view and quick acquisition of your target
    . . . Please INDICATE when overtaking cyclists !!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    3,333
    Quote Originally Posted by lensman57 View Post
    Are we all guilty of overscoping our Air Rifles?
    Not me - 1.5x20, 2.5x20 and 1.5-5x32 are all that I use. Makes me laugh when people insist on fitting a mega-scope to an air rifle that likely only ever be used for garden plinking - maybe it's because they're lacking in some other department. The scope manufacturers love it...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ashby-de-la-Zouch
    Posts
    939
    Quote Originally Posted by rabbitwrecker View Post
    Not me - 1.5x20, 2.5x20 and 1.5-5x32 are all that I use. Makes me laugh when people insist on fitting a mega-scope to an air rifle that likely only ever be used for garden plinking - maybe it's because they're lacking in some other department. The scope manufacturers love it...
    I don't think it's any different from driving a Porsche or Ferrari in this country, can't use that power or speed but if that's what floats your boat go for it
    I've seen people with massive scopes on backyard guns and they're having a great time

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Preston, Lancs
    Posts
    1,378
    I mainly hunt and find 6 x mag is sufficient. I shoot up to 40 yards.
    At the range, I shoot up to 70 yards at 9 x mag.
    Seems to work well enough for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Western Norway
    Posts
    321
    4x32 and AO for me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    4,956
    I have 2.5-10x42 Nighteater and a couple of 3-9x50 Panamax which double for NV use.
    You can spend thousands and still miss a barn door or spend just enough and enjoy yourself. If you haven't got the talent to start with a million pound won't fix it. Whippet, Russell, a few bang sticks and a flat cap. http://www.smart-tech1st.co.uk

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near Reigate, Surrey
    Posts
    19,495
    The answer to the OP's question in my experience is 'yes'. I am always discussing this with new club members along the lines of 'why on earth are you fitting a 6~24x50 crappy scope with side parallax adjustment wheels when all you are doing is shooting on 12x on a range that is 55 yards long at maximum. It just isn't necessary. I suggest to them that they would be better off buying a really nice-or at least 'better' scope with a maximum of 12x magnification. Also although a 30mm tube lets more light through than the humble 25mm this is more than enough for shooting at any air rifle range. Sadly few listen but that is up to them. The 'arms race' in gun and glass continues and will continue for as long as we shoot. Pride of ownership of high end (that is high price) kit will be with us for ever.
    'It may be that your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others'.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    4,956
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapidnick View Post
    The answer to the OP's question in my experience is 'yes'. I am always discussing this with new club members along the lines of 'why on earth are you fitting a 6~24x50 crappy scope with side parallax adjustment wheels when all you are doing is shooting on 12x on a range that is 55 yards long at maximum. It just isn't necessary. I suggest to them that they would be better off buying a really nice-or at least 'better' scope with a maximum of 12x magnification. Also although a 30mm tube lets more light through than the humble 25mm this is more than enough for shooting at any air rifle range. Sadly few listen but that is up to them. The 'arms race' in gun and glass continues and will continue for as long as we shoot. Pride of ownership of high end (that is high price) kit will be with us for ever.
    My 3-9x50 is used on my FAC in .25 out to 100 yards. AS Nick has said you just can't teach someone who has a closed mind.
    You can spend thousands and still miss a barn door or spend just enough and enjoy yourself. If you haven't got the talent to start with a million pound won't fix it. Whippet, Russell, a few bang sticks and a flat cap. http://www.smart-tech1st.co.uk

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ashford
    Posts
    1,222
    When I was still a member of a local airgun club there was a definite 'bigger is better' approach to scopes. Many of the folks used ridiculous scopes for the 30-50 yard range. Now i've moved on to mostly rimfire and the trend is the exact opposite with most people preferring the small scopes which top at about 6 mag with a 20 or 24mm objective. Also a surprising number of tactical style reflex sights which are still very under used on airguns, especially for things like barn ratting.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Ulrome Driffield
    Posts
    1,727
    I am in the less is more camp but I can underststand and I do appreciate and agree with the "pride of ownership" thing.

    I'm learning that, pound for pound, a scope with fewer bells and whistles where the expense has gone into better engineering and clearer glass usually results in respect for the item and better performance. So for me, I now flit between 32mm and 40mm, the exception being........

    On talking to my target shooting team mates, (25yd .22 lr benchrest), who think nothing of having scopes up to or beyond 20 magnification with 50mm lenses, (but set them on 12x), they tell me that you don't want to be on your limits of magnification so it's best to have plenty in reserve. I can sort of see the logic in that but ideally I need it explaining in more detail.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near Reigate, Surrey
    Posts
    19,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Portzy View Post
    I am in the less is more camp but I can underststand and I do appreciate and agree with the "pride of ownership" thing.

    I'm learning that, pound for pound, a scope with fewer bells and whistles where the expense has gone into better engineering and clearer glass usually results in respect for the item and better performance. So for me, I now flit between 32mm and 40mm, the exception being........

    On talking to my target shooting team mates, (25yd .22 lr benchrest), who think nothing of having scopes up to or beyond 20 magnification with 50mm lenses, (but set them on 12x), they tell me that you don't want to be on your limits of magnification so it's best to have plenty in reserve. I can sort of see the logic in that but ideally I need it explaining in more detail.
    Sadly not possible to explain because it is just plain wrong. To think in terms of 'operating below maximum capability' they are drawing a false analogy to a car engine where if it is capable of say 120 MPH driving it at 70 MPH is well within its limits. This is NOT the case with optics. As a reasonably serious photographer I know just how much money needs to be spent to achieve incremental performance. The same consideration applies to sports optics. If anyone needs a lesson in this I suggest they look through a modest pair of binoculars and then look through something like a Leica or Swarowski pair with similar spec. The difference is between night and day. If you buy a cheapo scope with 20x magnification it WILL be rubbish-it cannot be anything else as too many compromises have been made in its design and manufacture. Spending the same money on a 12x scope will give you more chance of getting a satisfactory image at 12x.
    'It may be that your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others'.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    7,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapidnick View Post
    Sadly not possible to explain because it is just plain wrong. To think in terms of 'operating below maximum capability' they are drawing a false analogy to a car engine where if it is capable of say 120 MPH driving it at 70 MPH is well within its limits. This is NOT the case with optics. As a reasonably serious photographer I know just how much money needs to be spent to achieve incremental performance. The same consideration applies to sports optics. If anyone needs a lesson in this I suggest they look through a modest pair of binoculars and then look through something like a Leica or Swarowski pair with similar spec. The difference is between night and day. If you buy a cheapo scope with 20x magnification it WILL be rubbish-it cannot be anything else as too many compromises have been made in its design and manufacture. Spending the same money on a 12x scope will give you more chance of getting a satisfactory image at 12x.
    A fellow photographer. Nice to share the same basic understanding of the performance of optics. Besdies some " fine art " and land scape photography I also do a bit of Deep Space Long Exposure madness and you are absolutely right in saying that from a certain point the price of incremental gain in optics performance is exponential in terms of money but the fact remains that a top class optic will wash the floor with the mediocre ones.
    I am also guilty as charged regarding having too much scope on my air rifles but I have taken the big 56 mm objective off and at the moment am quite happy using a 10X44 Viper on my HW 100 and is good enough to 100 yards for a golf ball.
    Recently I have been looking at 2.5X10X40s or even 2X8X32s but the price of good glass V run of the mill is not something that I could justify in my present circumstances.
    As far as hunting goes, although I don't hunt, I should imagine the best way is to stick tto a fixed power scope as in time the eye/brain combination will learn to range the targets without needing to use a rangefinder .

    A.G

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Hayle,Cornwall
    Posts
    21
    I have recently got into shooting and joined a local club.
    Most there shoot FT so mega scopes are the thing. 10-50x60 are normal.
    Due to cost alone I have bought a Zos 10-40x50 scope which is a good starter.
    However to progress serious money has to be spent. Not for me!
    Do we over scope? Depends what we shoot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •