Diana 45

[Geezer]

Yes I can't argue with much of what you have pointed out geezer. I think official and customer proven evidence pints to the 34 having higher power potential. Not quite sure which one wins on making that power smoother though. As we all know, more isn't necessarily best.
Ironically- and tjis is a purely personal perspective- I think that the RWS 45 was an.improvement over the rather bland 45, and in my book maybe it should have been the first format of the gun rather than.the last? Though its possible that the thinking there was to try and distinguish the 45 as an all new gun rather than a beefed up 35s which the RWS 45 shares a very similar stock to? And yes the stampede to.get the HW80 undoubtedly caused some sales damage to.the 45. But for those that didn't follow the herd I'm sure they continued to enjoy a very well engineered quality product.
It would be interesting to speculate as to what the price point would be of a 45 equivalent these days. And yes it may well be that Blighty could be overlooked if a 45 got re introduced in.the same way we are presently with the new FWB.

The RWS does indeed handle well and is more comfortable to shoot. John Walter said the opposite but I'm not with him on this now I have got my hands on the RWS, finally. There's a hint of match rifle about the RWS but obviously in a lighter package.
I find the safety is very handily placed on the 45's and its satisfying to click it off with the thumb. Yes, addictive rifles. And they can trade punches with just about any other standard springer.

For me I prefer the HW80 if I had to choose between the pair & its not just for the Rekord trigger unit as the 45 unit is very nice when working correctly & the 45 stock is more usable than it looks.

Its the large plastic safety & the habit of the 45 to shear a portion of the pellet skirt (.22) that makes it second best for me.

BTDT in SAR definitely rated the RWS45 in 1984 or so.

[Drew451]

BTDT in SAR definitely rated the RWS45 in 1984 or so.

Someone kindly pointed me towards that test recently and they did give it a huge thumbs up. I would also say that the quality of the review was a cut above most others I have read.
I was not a reader of the magazine as it was a bit before my time. Pity.

[landymick]

Someone kindly pointed me towards that test recently and they did give it a huge thumbs up. I would also say that the quality of the review was a cut above most others I have read.
I was not a reader of the magazine as it was a bit before my time. Pity.

It was Jims review that led me to buy the RWS 45 version even though I already had a .177 Original 45.

SAR the best Air Rifle mag ever, shame it finished.

[jonnyone]

BTDT in SAR definitely rated the RWS45 in 1984 or so.

I picked mine up around the same time though more by default than design as some numpty had taken the leather head out of it and neglected to replace it- with anything as I later found out. They then passed it onto a second hand shop in town. The seething anger of the shop seller when I passed the gun back to him after it failed to push the pellet out of the barrel was disturbing! I think he would have bent the gun over the head of the guy who flogged it to him.
I simply helped the shop owner out by buying it at a suitable discount.
It still shoots well to this day
Yes I think I recall it was quite a potent weapon against the local squirrels if I remember right- much like my own-in both calibres