Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Are 5.6 mm pellets necessary for a 1923 BSA Standard?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,529

    Are 5.6 mm pellets necessary for a 1923 BSA Standard?

    Reading that these barrels were larger in diameter and need larger pellets? Problem in US they are not available? Guest I could take off the loading tap and pass pellets through from the tip of the barrel to see if I am getting any resistance to various pellets? H&N seem very accurate, Crosman not so much.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Farnborough
    Posts
    4,400
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    Reading that these barrels were larger in diameter and need larger pellets? Problem in US they are not available? Guest I could take off the loading tap and pass pellets through from the tip of the barrel to see if I am getting any resistance to various pellets? H&N seem very accurate, Crosman not so much.
    If H&N are accurate in your rifle why worry about it?
    Rich
    WANTED: Next weeks winning lottery numbers :-)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,529
    Quote Originally Posted by averageplinker View Post
    If H&N are accurate in your rifle why worry about it?
    Rich
    That's just too simple an answer but true. Lol. But accuracy was tested at pretty short distances.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    clacton
    Posts
    695
    the bigger pellets work better in mine,not necessarily the ones most recommended.i have tried the old eley wasp now discontinued but fairly universally favoured and they are not as good in my barrel as cheapo milbro select.the milbros are stated as 5.5 but are bigger,they don't fit my german 5.5 barrel without a bloody good squeeze.i find the rifle shoot harsh with small pellets,not surprising really with them rattling down the barrel.hobby and superdomes seemed ok IIRC. others will have their own preferences.i might have to take the general advice and clean the barrel,looked ok when i stripped it but to my knowledge has not been done for many years. ATB

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,424
    yeah, it's all about harsh shooting - if the pellets are too small, and either don't seal well, or leave a load of lost volume behind them as they fall down into the tap, it's not shoot nicely.

    Superdomes are a great cheap "larger" pellet, even though they are not actually advertised as 5.6
    Vintage defiant are also excellent
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Farnborough
    Posts
    4,400
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    That's just too simple an answer but true. Lol. But accuracy was tested at pretty short distances.
    Time for a longer range test superdomes get a good write up here, if the USA is the same as the UK they are usually good value too.
    WANTED: Next weeks winning lottery numbers :-)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,593
    Usual recommendations: Superdomes, Superpoints, Milbro, Marksman, Defiant Vintage. I have had good results in some older British .22"s with Superfields, but I am not sure that is a common experience.

    I also think RWS Hobbys work at least adequately in most guns.

    But, basically, try a lot. Sometimes cheap ones (Milbro, Marksman) work as well or better than the pricier stuff.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,529
    Quote Originally Posted by averageplinker View Post
    Time for a longer range test superdomes get a good write up here, if the USA is the same as the UK they are usually good value too.
    Superdomes are an easy get here, I also have a tin of Milbro Sellect. The Milbros were perfect to feed into my old Crosman 102 cause they are pretty short. But they are gone now too.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Pulborough
    Posts
    997

    Standard Tests

    This is an interesting discussion, 45flint, as was your other post about the excellence of the pre-war BSA Standard.

    I hope the following is helpful. Earlier this year, I bought a 1922 BSA Standard. The gunsmith tested a number of pellets on his chrono and here are the velocities:

    Defiant Vintage: 589 fps 11.17 ft/lb (I gather these pellets are no longer in production)
    BSA Elite: 575fps 11.32ft/lb
    Milbro: 573fps 9.34ft/lbs (which either suggests this is a very light pellet - not sure which variety of Milbro but perhaps Caledonian - or I mistakenly recorded the velocity as 573fps instead of 473fps)
    Superdome: 592fps 11.31ft/lbs

    I have tested the above pellets (except Milbro) at different ranges out to approx. 30 yds in the field, on targets during a still day. The Elites were the least accurate but Defiants and Superdomes produced good groupings of approx. 1inch and less at 30yds.

    I also had velocity tests carried out on a Standard BSA 1939. I have not tested the accuracy of the pellets but can report on the chrono results:

    Defiant Vintage: 566fps 10.40 ft/lbs
    Superdomes: 568fps 10.43ft/lbs
    Eley Wasps: 538fps 9.38ft/lbs
    BSA Elites: 557fps 10.61ft/lbs
    Superfield Bisley 499fps -

    Note the poor velocity for the Eley Wasps (original Eley Wasps - not the new substandard variety). It would be interesting to see what Wasps record on the 1922 Standard but this would entail another visit to the gunsmith.

    In both instances, note the performance of the Superdomes. These are modern, 5.5mm pellets. There is little difference between them and the Defiant Vintage .22. I am not certain if the BSA Elites are .22 or 5.5mm. In any event, these tests appear to demonstrate that the .22 Standard is acceptable to 5.5mm pellets without any noticeable decrease in power or accuracy. This assumes that there is consistency between the rifles over the years and various models of production, which might not be the case.

    Kind regards
    Andrew.

  10. #10
    micky2 is offline The collector formerly known as micky
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    2,156
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Usual recommendations: Superdomes, Superpoints, Milbro, Marksman, Defiant Vintage. I have had good results in some older British .22"s with Superfields, but I am not sure that is a common experience.

    I also think RWS Hobbys work at least adequately in most guns.

    But, basically, try a lot. Sometimes cheap ones (Milbro, Marksman) work as well or better than the pricier stuff.
    l have to agree with the Milbro, Marksman. good for the old BSAs and cheap as well.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Farnborough
    Posts
    4,400
    I wonder if these pellets which work well have thinner skirts and/or softer lead making them deform to fit the barrels well?
    Rich
    WANTED: Next weeks winning lottery numbers :-)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead, Herts
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by andrewM View Post
    This is an interesting discussion, 45flint, as was your other post about the excellence of the pre-war BSA Standard.

    I hope the following is helpful. Earlier this year, I bought a 1922 BSA Standard. The gunsmith tested a number of pellets on his chrono and here are the velocities:

    Defiant Vintage: 589 fps 11.17 ft/lb (I gather these pellets are no longer in production)
    BSA Elite: 575fps 11.32ft/lb
    Milbro: 573fps 9.34ft/lbs (which either suggests this is a very light pellet - not sure which variety of Milbro but perhaps Caledonian - or I mistakenly recorded the velocity as 573fps instead of 473fps)
    Superdome: 592fps 11.31ft/lbs

    I have tested the above pellets (except Milbro) at different ranges out to approx. 30 yds in the field, on targets during a still day. The Elites were the least accurate but Defiants and Superdomes produced good groupings of approx. 1inch and less at 30yds.

    I also had velocity tests carried out on a Standard BSA 1939. I have not tested the accuracy of the pellets but can report on the chrono results:

    Defiant Vintage: 566fps 10.40 ft/lbs
    Superdomes: 568fps 10.43ft/lbs
    Eley Wasps: 538fps 9.38ft/lbs
    BSA Elites: 557fps 10.61ft/lbs
    Superfield Bisley 499fps -

    Note the poor velocity for the Eley Wasps (original Eley Wasps - not the new substandard variety). It would be interesting to see what Wasps record on the 1922 Standard but this would entail another visit to the gunsmith.

    In both instances, note the performance of the Superdomes. These are modern, 5.5mm pellets. There is little difference between them and the Defiant Vintage .22. I am not certain if the BSA Elites are .22 or 5.5mm. In any event, these tests appear to demonstrate that the .22 Standard is acceptable to 5.5mm pellets without any noticeable decrease in power or accuracy. This assumes that there is consistency between the rifles over the years and various models of production, which might not be the case.

    Kind regards
    Andrew.


    The DEFIANT VINTAGE 5.60mm still available on E**Y and will be for some time yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •