Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 91

Thread: Theoben gasram collection

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Blackburn, Lancs. (under a bridge)
    Posts
    22,944
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcurmudgeon View Post
    I have to correct I.J. here, the two Webleys are not the only power variable models made. I have an adjustable power model and also know of others who own various models with variable output.
    Back in the day a few slant face receivers were produced with an extended valve which could be accessed without removing the stock. I believe that while a few stayed in the country, most were exported. I have seen a thumhole stocked Eliminator in .177 with this modification.
    Every day is a school day.

    The example of Omega (W & W lot 1168) and Vulcan (W & W lot 1167) I have with adjustable, not to be confused with the gas strut, were from the Wallis & Wallis auction and appear in the catalogue as '...converted by Theoben to gas ram system...'. .
    I contacted Theoben to make further inquiries and they had no knowledge of these guns. I have never seen or heard until today of another example of a gas ram Vulcan or Omega. Was Webley being naughty?

    http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Airs...ml?sort=6&o=90

    ATB
    Ian
    Last edited by I. J.; 25-09-2017 at 04:13 PM. Reason: spelling
    Founder & ex secretary of Rivington Riflemen.
    www.rivington-riflemen.uk

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by transporter View Post
    My 1985/1986/ sirocco classics and country man are still on their original seals and still shoot sweet

    I don't doubt there's plenty around older than my Fenman that haven't been touched, kind of makes you wonder about people having owned more than one Theoben that lost pressure from day one, o'rings, backup rings and seals aren't rocket science to make super reliable even in far harsher environments than an airgun, I would've thought older guns that maybe haven't been used for long periods would have been more likely to suffer from o'ring embrittlement or damage through sticking.

    As an aside, I was looking at this http://www.dursley.org.uk/air/gasramsstrip.pdf and was surpised to see in step 9 what looks like a Fenman action with a stepped back up to 31mm piston head, did they stop sleeving them down to 27mm on those later ones?

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dursley
    Posts
    2,745
    Quote Originally Posted by crosswind View Post
    As an aside, I was looking at this http://www.dursley.org.uk/air/gasramsstrip.pdf and was surpised to see in step 9 what looks like a Fenman action with a stepped back up to 31mm piston head, did they stop sleeving them down to 27mm on those later ones?
    Well spotted. I'm not sure whether to call it a Fenman or an Evo. It's certainly in a Fenman stock, but has dovetails rather than fixed mounts, and was sold to me as a Fenman. The s/n makes it seem to be rather late to be a "real" Fenman, so what differences are there between what you see in the photos and an older Fenman (or newer Evo) action?

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    aberdeenshire
    Posts
    25,209
    my supposed 2003 evo is 81 rifles from that serial number in the dursley link.

    might be the barrel it left the factory with that or swapped at some point . given that some may prefer a .177 but bought a .22 and did a barrel swap .
    Last edited by bighit; 25-09-2017 at 04:20 PM.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near Reigate, Surrey
    Posts
    19,495
    I am prompted to enter the following on this thread:

    'In my view the BEST 'general purpose, legal limit self contained' air rifle ever made is the Theoben Fenman in .20'

    Why I sold mine I'll never know but I do have a very nice one in .177 with the short barrel which shoots spot on.
    'It may be that your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others'.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dursley
    Posts
    2,745
    Quote Originally Posted by bighit View Post
    my supposed 2003 evo is 81 rifles from that serial number in the dursley link.

    might be the barrel it left the factory with that or swapped at some point . given that some may prefer a .177 but bought a .22 and did a barrel swap .
    But this is a .20 and very nice too.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dursley
    Posts
    2,745
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapidnick View Post

    'In my view the BEST 'general purpose, legal limit self contained' air rifle ever made is the Theoben Fenman in .20'
    ........and I would dare anybody to argue with the above!

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    399
    Ive got a Fenman in 20 cal, ive done nothing scientific shooting wise, but I much prefer the walnut stock on my Evolution 20 cal and it couldn't be any more accurate than it is.

    I've picked up a number of classic Theobens this year and have been massively impressed with the quality. There is just something about them quality wise. The early ones pre-vortex silencer are particularly well made.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    south elmsall,pontefract
    Posts
    998
    I have a early fenman that started life as a .22 with profile stock but now it,s a .20 in a cs500 stock and i wont part with it.
    rgds stubbs4612

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    spalding
    Posts
    3,319
    Quote Originally Posted by severnsider View Post
    Well spotted. I'm not sure whether to call it a Fenman or an Evo. It's certainly in a Fenman stock, but has dovetails rather than fixed mounts, and was sold to me as a Fenman. The s/n makes it seem to be rather late to be a "real" Fenman, so what differences are there between what you see in the photos and an older Fenman (or newer Evo) action?
    The ones with the dovetails are real fenmen but are the transition to the evo, very very late crossover guns before they diluted the brand somewhat with the evo (yes I do have an evo in my collection so beforenthenflaming starts!)

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by severnsider View Post
    Well spotted. I'm not sure whether to call it a Fenman or an Evo. It's certainly in a Fenman stock, but has dovetails rather than fixed mounts, and was sold to me as a Fenman. The s/n makes it seem to be rather late to be a "real" Fenman, so what differences are there between what you see in the photos and an older Fenman (or newer Evo) action?
    So the one in the PDF is yours?
    Going by memory and the old eye-ometer, mines TB10557 and late 96 according to a record of serial numbers I saw online somewhere and the piston on mine has quite a bit more material wasted away further towards the back of the piston, and no welded on end where the crown is, plus it isn't stepped up in diameter like that one in the pictures which definitely doesn't look like it has a cylinder sleeve in it when looking at the picture of the cylinder slot with the piston head pulled back to where the cocking groove is, the stroke may be different as the pictured one looks to have the sear engagement further towards the piston crown whereas mine engages right at the very end of the piston.

    The dummy piston or inner sliding spear assembly on mine isn't retained by circlip and doesn't have a central shrader valve or big o'ring around the back of it, instead being retained by a crosspin and a central grub screw to retain that, plus schrader port on the top edge of the spear assembly and the older soldered on scope mounts the rings screw to.Also the forward articulated cocking link on mine is two halves with spacers inbetween not solid like that one.

    I've only ever taken the piston out of mine once not long after I got it as curiosity got the better of me, and I didn't separate the spear from the piston but I'm sure I don't remember a brass seal carrier being in mine, I've read from others that Theoben experimented quite a bit with different material seal carriers along with o'ring and seal arrangements, inertia weights with holes and without holes, what interests me most about the one in that PDF is the bigger diameter piston head, considering the sleeved down cylinder and wasted away piston was big enough deal to put in the advertising, I'm wondering maybe this one was an FAC version with a slightly longer stroke, no sleeved cylinder and a slightly heavier piston, I'm surprised if it is considering it looks like it has the 7.5" barrel and as far as I was aware the FAC version was only available with 10.5" barrel, I guess it could have been shortened after by someone if it was an FAC version, or alternatively maybe they were getting back some swept volume in the 12 ft lb models to improve the cycle in .177 caliber which I don't think was even available when I got mine.

    Would love to know for sure, but that's my thoughts

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by stubbs4612 View Post
    I have a early fenman that started life as a .22 with profile stock but now it,s a .20 in a cs500 stock and i wont part with it.
    rgds stubbs4612
    I can't say my profile stock excites me greatly either, it's one of the uglier ones I've seen being mostly very dark all over compared to some of the very light coloured ones with dark sapwood? lines running through it.
    Would like to try a CS stock as I'm not really a huge fan of the balance with the profile, kind of an expensive experiment if it doesn't change much though

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dursley
    Posts
    2,745
    Quote Originally Posted by crosswind View Post
    So the one in the PDF is yours?
    Going by memory and the old eye-ometer, mines TB10557 and late 96 according to a record of serial numbers I saw online somewhere and the piston on mine has quite a bit more material wasted away further towards the back of the piston, and no welded on end where the crown is, plus it isn't stepped up in diameter like that one in the pictures which definitely doesn't look like it has a cylinder sleeve in it when looking at the picture of the cylinder slot with the piston head pulled back to where the cocking groove is, the stroke may be different as the pictured one looks to have the sear engagement further towards the piston crown whereas mine engages right at the very end of the piston.

    The dummy piston or inner sliding spear assembly on mine isn't retained by circlip and doesn't have a central shrader valve or big o'ring around the back of it, instead being retained by a crosspin and a central grub screw to retain that, plus schrader port on the top edge of the spear assembly and the older soldered on scope mounts the rings screw to.Also the forward articulated cocking link on mine is two halves with spacers inbetween not solid like that one.

    I've only ever taken the piston out of mine once not long after I got it as curiosity got the better of me, and I didn't separate the spear from the piston but I'm sure I don't remember a brass seal carrier being in mine, I've read from others that Theoben experimented quite a bit with different material seal carriers along with o'ring and seal arrangements, inertia weights with holes and without holes, what interests me most about the one in that PDF is the bigger diameter piston head, considering the sleeved down cylinder and wasted away piston was big enough deal to put in the advertising, I'm wondering maybe this one was an FAC version with a slightly longer stroke, no sleeved cylinder and a slightly heavier piston, I'm surprised if it is considering it looks like it has the 7.5" barrel and as far as I was aware the FAC version was only available with 10.5" barrel, I guess it could have been shortened after by someone if it was an FAC version, or alternatively maybe they were getting back some swept volume in the 12 ft lb models to improve the cycle in .177 caliber which I don't think was even available when I got mine.

    Would love to know for sure, but that's my thoughts
    Yes, it's mine in the PDF. I bunged a few "gasram-related" items on the site just in case they might be of some interest to others. The rifle in question is dated around September 2003. There is no cylinder sleeve. It does have a 7.5" barrel and I doubt it would have been FAC to start with. I have some older models where the dummy piston is retained by a crosspin and grubscrew, and with offset Schrader valves too. As you state, the cocking links differ on older rifles.
    It's all good fun. a kind of "Guess the model of Theoben" game. It's beginning to look as though the only thing which determined the name of the rifle at this time (as there do seem to be several different constructions of action) was the style of stock to which the action was fitted

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Derbyshire
    Posts
    908
    If any if you blokes want to know about theoben gasrams , join the theoben gasram owners on FB

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    105
    Anybody know how many SLR88 ultra carbines were made compared to the .177 FT version?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •