may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
That front sight is hideous.
The rear sight is positioned too far forwards to give a good sight-base. It's a scope-only gun really.
I would get rid of them both, and if open sights are something you want, then get a lighter break-barrel and have that as your dedicated open sights gun. Swapping scope with opens on one rifle is a pain in the arse anyway.
Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
I agree, but I am not sure what to replace the front sight with as it's light and a nice balance and I don't want to spoil the feel, It's actually lighter than break barrels like the 80 and ofcourse the LGV.Originally Posted by Hsing-ee
Also look how close the lever is to the barrel, I like the look but not easy to fit a ball catch so close to the barrel.
The plastic unit is robust and light and as you can see in the OP easily modified to scope only and I don't have to go filling and drilling the barrel, the only thing is I don't like plastic bits
Last edited by Barryg; 22-09-2017 at 12:05 PM.
Registered User
Would a 97 one fit?
Plinkerer and Tinkerer
Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
No because the lever is closer to the barrel on the 460 and the length of the lever is different
This is what it looks like under the sight unit
https://imgur.com/TOAz7sS
Last edited by Barryg; 22-09-2017 at 12:47 PM.
Registered User
Ally sleeve with std TX ball detent assembly fastened to it?
Plinkerer and Tinkerer
Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
Do you mean something like this but Ally instead of steel
https://imgur.com/aZ1fUtR
Registered User
Yes! Shouldn't be too difficult or expensive?
Plinkerer and Tinkerer
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
